Answer:
the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers
Explanation: After the United States joined World War II, the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers. This strategy involved a combination of military, economic, and political tactics.
Militarily, the Allies used a combination of ground, naval, and air forces to launch attacks on Axis territories from multiple directions. This involved coordinated offensives in different theaters of the war, including Europe, Africa, and Asia. The Allies used their superior resources and firepower to gradually push back Axis forces, liberating occupied territories and advancing towards the heartlands of Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Economically, the Allies implemented a range of measures to weaken the Axis powers. The United States, as the leading economic power, provided significant economic aid to the Allies, including supplies, weapons, and money. This helped sustain the war effort and allowed the Allies to out-produce the Axis in terms of arms and resources. The Allies also implemented economic blockades and trade restrictions to disrupt Axis supply lines and limit their access to critical resources.
Politically, the Allies worked to build and maintain a coalition of nations united against the Axis powers. This involved diplomacy, propaganda, and intelligence efforts to gain the support of neutral nations and undermine Axis influence. The Allies also worked to coordinate their military efforts and minimize conflicts between their own forces, which was not always easy given their different strategic priorities and national interests.
Overall, the Allies' strategy after the US joined WWII was to use their combined military, economic, and political resources to wear down the Axis powers and ultimately defeat them. While this strategy took time and required significant sacrifices, it ultimately succeeded in achieving the Allies' objectives and bringing an end to the war.
Explain why the people of the Middle Ages would not have used that term?
Assuming that the term in question is related to a modern concept or technology, the people of the Middle Ages would not have used that term because they did not have the knowledge, technology, or cultural context necessary to conceive of or use that term. The Middle Ages, also known as the Medieval period, lasted from the 5th to the 15th century, and was characterized by feudalism, the rise of Christianity, and the absence of many modern technologies and concepts. Many modern scientific, political, and cultural ideas and inventions did not exist during this time, so it is unlikely that the people of the Middle Ages would have used or understood them in the same way that we do today. Additionally, the languages and vocabularies of the Middle Ages were different from those of modern times, which further limits the likelihood that they would have used or understood the same terms we use today.
Urgent
1. What was accomplished economically during the Porfiriato? How were those gains made? Who did they benefit? Who did they not benefit, or even harm?
2. Compare and contrast the lives of the upper and lower classes. Include both rural and urban life. Was the divide between classes improved through the Porfiriato? Why or why not?
Daz and his advisors completely overhauled Mexico's infrastructure while he was president by constructing railroads, schools, and other facilities.
El Porfiriato saw fast modernisation and economic expansion in Mexico while also restricting freedom of the press and civil liberties. General Diaz thought that his administration needed to pursue a paternalistic strategy since the Mexican people weren't ready to practice democracy.
In order to create space for commercial interests, Diaz forcibly removed literally millions of Mexicans from their farms and homes. He also violated the civil liberties protected by the Constitution of 1857.
Thus, Daz and his advisors completely overhauled Mexico's infrastructure.
For more information about Mexico, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8977987
#SPJ1
Which of the following organizations came into being as a result of the American involvement in conflicts in the Middle
East?
A.Al Qaeda
B.the KGB
C.the United Nations
D.the League of Nations
Al Qaeda of the following organizations came into being as a result of the American involvement in conflicts in the Middle East. The correct option is A.
As a result of American engagement in Middle Eastern conflicts, particularly the Soviet-Afghan War in the 1980s, an organization known as Al Qaeda was born. The KGB is the former Soviet Union's intelligence service, and it has nothing to do with the Middle Eastern conflicts. The League of Nations and the United Nations are multinational organizations designed to uphold world peace and cooperation; they have nothing to do especially with American engagement in Middle Eastern crises.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about Al Qaeda here:
https://brainly.com/question/10449607
#SPJ1
Laissez-faire economics and antitrust acts were:
© A. unlikely to be supported by the same person.
B. hallmarks of the Populist Party platform.
O c. vocally supported by the robber barons.
• D. designed to rein in businesses that grew too large.
Option (d), Antitrust laws and laissez-faire economics were created to control out-of-control corporate growth.
What effects on the economy did laissez-faire have?Businesses operate with more flexibility under a free-market economy because there are fewer government prohibitions that would complicate doing business. In this environment, businesses are more inclined to take risks and make economic investments.
Antitrust laws are intended to control what.Antitrust laws are the regulations that regulate the market and how it operates. The objectives of these laws are to prevent monopolies and to reduce unfair commercial practices. Although the antitrust laws have been around for more than a century, their primary objective has remained the same: to protect the market's competitive environment for the benefit of consumers by making sure that businesses have strong incentives to operate profitably, keep costs down, and uphold high standards of quality.
Learn more about Antitrust laws: https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ1
Why were the Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful?
a. They harmed local businesses' revenue.
b. They appealed to the business owners' morality.
c. They won the support of the President.
d. They appealed to religious feelings.
Answer: A. They harmed local businesses' revenue.
The economy of the US in the 80s
Question 1 of 10
Which statement best describes the circumstances surrounding the Voting
Rights Act of 1965 extension?
OA. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act and refused to
sign the extension, causing the law to lapse.
OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed
the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.
C. President Reagan was a strong supporter of the Voting Rights Act
and worked with the NAACP to sign the extension into law.
D. President Reagan repealed the Voting Rights Act and cut off
funding to agencies that were supposed to enforce it.
Answer:
The correct answer is OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.
President Reagan initially opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 extension, but he signed it into law after public pressure from the NAACP. The NAACP argued that the law was still necessary to protect the voting rights of African Americans. Reagan signed the extension, but he also called for reforms to the law.
IF CORRECT BRAINEST!!
Put the following in the order they occurred. This is an all or nothing question. A few have been provided for you in the Road to the Civil War Timeline.
Answer:
#1 Missouri Compromise
#2 Compromise of 1850
#3 Fugitive Slave Act
#4 Uncle Tom's Cabinn
#5 Kansas-Nebraska Act
#6 Bleeding Kansas
#7 Dred Scott vs. Sanford
#8 Lincoln-Douglas Debates
#9 John Brown's Raid
#10 Lincoln Elected President
#11 Southern Secession
Late, but, hope it helped! :)
So, brainliest? Please.
what is the difference between the city of Babylon and the story?
The city of Babylon was a real historical city located in Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq), founded in the 3rd millennium BCE. It was an important cultural and political center in ancient times, and it was famously known for its impressive walls and the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, which were considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
The story of Babylon, on the other hand, refers to the biblical story of the Tower of Babel. According to the story, the people of Babylon attempted to build a tower that would reach the heavens, but God caused them to speak different languages, causing confusion and leading to the abandonment of the tower. The story is often interpreted as a warning against human arrogance and the dangers of trying to reach too high.
In summary, the city of Babylon is a historical place, while the story of Babylon is a religious or mythological tale that is often used to convey a moral lesson.
~~~Harsha~~~
This passage, written by economist David A.
Wells in 1889, describes changes to work during the Industrial Age. The modern manufacturing system has been brought into a condition [similar] to that of a military organization, in which the individual no longer works as independently as formerly, but as a private in the ranks, obeying orders, keeping step, as it were, to the tap of the drum, and having nothing to say as to the plan of his work, of its final completion, or of its ultimate use and distribution. In short, the people who work in the modern factory are, as a rule, taught to do one thing -to perform one and generally a simple operation; and when there is no more of that kind of work to do, they are in a measure helpless. The result has been... [the destruction of] the pride which the workman formerly took in his work... What is one result of the changes described in this passage?
Workers were paid more as their values to companies increased.
Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.
Workers became more loyal to companies who rewarded their creativity.
Workers were celebrated for their individual skills, and the need for labor unions declined.
Based on the passage, the result of the changes described is that workers became more interchangeable and were taught to perform only one simple operation. This led to the destruction of the pride that the workman formerly took in his work. Therefore, the correct answer is: Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.
according to this map, which two groups of people were settled on lands to the WEST of the thirteen british coloniee
Answer:
French
Indians
Explanation:
Correct me if I'm wrong!!
Race
1. What does this letter say about the link between science and colonialism ?
2. What does this letter say about race relations in colonial South Africa in the early 19th century
1.)The letter in question highlights the strong link between science and colonialism in the early 19th century. 2.) In his letter, he notes that he is able to carry out his work thanks to the assistance of local inhabitants who are essentially treated as his assistants.
1.)This relationship between the British scientist and the local inhabitants of South Africa reflects the wider colonial context of the time. Colonial powers like Britain relied heavily on the knowledge and labor of indigenous peoples to support their scientific and economic endeavors.
This dynamic often resulted in the exploitation of these populations and the perpetuation of racial inequalities.
2.) Moreover, the letter sheds light on the fraught race relations that characterized colonial South Africa. The author notes that the local inhabitants he worked with were "natives" who spoke a different language and were considered inferior to Europeans.
This attitude reflects the deep-seated racism that permeated colonial society and helped to justify the subjugation and exploitation of non-white populations.
Overall, the letter underscores the ways in which science and colonialism were inextricably linked in the early 19th century. It also highlights the deeply troubling race relations that characterized colonial South Africa and the broader colonial project.
For more question on colonialism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9388993
#SPJ11
Answer the questions from the station materials.
1. A politician running for re-election who is already in office is known as an incumbent.
2. Over 80% of the time, incumbents win re-election to the House and Senate, with a relatively high percentage of incumbents doing so.
3. The high percentage of re-election for incumbents is due to several factors. He has a track record, name recognition and fundraising advantage. Additionally, incumbents have the power to use their position to aid residents, which has the potential to boost their popularity and make it more difficult for competitors to win voters.
4.The graph shows that incumbents invest more money in their election campaigns than challengers. Incumbents typically spend $3,000, while challengers typically spend $2,800.
5. Candidates had several options for raising money for their election campaigns, including contributions from private citizens, PACs, and party organizations. Although it is less frequent, candidates can also finance their campaigns with their own money.
Learn more about incumbents, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31478528
#SPJ1
A combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force was used to erode Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas. What are some examples of these different tactics?
Answer & Explanation:
Various tactics were employed by the United States to undermine Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas during the 19th century. These tactics included a combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force. Some examples of these tactics are:
Manifest Destiny: The belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States was destined to expand across the North American continent, played a significant role in justifying the erosion of Mexican rights and social structures. This attitude led to widespread support for American expansion into Mexican territories, often at the expense of the Mexican people.
Economic pressure: American settlers and entrepreneurs moved into Mexican territories, such as California and Texas, and established businesses and farms. This influx of American economic activity undermined the local Mexican economy and displaced Mexican landowners. Additionally, the increasing economic dependence on the United States made it more difficult for Mexico to maintain control over these regions.
Land policies and dispossession: American land policies in newly acquired territories, like the implementation of the Homestead Act, often favored American settlers over Mexican landholders. These policies led to the dispossession of Mexican landowners and further eroded their rights and social structures.
Brute force and military action: The United States engaged in military actions, such as the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), to forcefully annex Mexican territories, including California and Texas. The war and subsequent Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo resulted in the loss of a substantial portion of Mexico's territory and further weakened its influence in the region.
Racism and discrimination: American settlers often held racist attitudes towards Mexicans and other non-white groups. This led to discrimination and violence against Mexican communities, further eroding their rights and social structures. For example, the lynching of Mexicans in Texas by Anglo-American vigilantes was not uncommon during this period.
Assimilation and Americanization: American authorities and settlers promoted the assimilation of Mexican populations into American society, often at the expense of their cultural identity and social structures. This process, sometimes referred to as "Americanization," involved the imposition of American customs, language, and values on Mexican communities.
These tactics, which combined attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force, significantly impacted Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas, leading to the long-lasting marginalization of Mexican-American communities in these regions.
Use this passage to answer the following question:
The Cotton Gin
Andrea Brecheen
The cotton gin was one of the most amazing and tragic inventions of early America. The cotton gin is credited to the brilliant and creative American inventor Eli Whitney. Because Whitney's invention made cotton harvesting easier, it allowed farmers in the South to increase production. The cotton gin simplified the process of removing the cotton from the seeds, a process formerly done by hand.
As a result, Southern plantations increased their production of cotton from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales just 20 years later. Because of the increase in production, the farmers in South became even more dependent on cotton for revenue. This new reliance on cotton increased the need for slavery. More slaves were needed to farm the ever expanding cotton plantations. If Whitney had known the effects his invention would have on slavery, he never would have created it.
Which of the following would best support the author's claim that more slaves were needed after the invention of the cotton gin?
Examples of other inventions that affected slaves' lives
Information related to the life and times of Eli Whitney
Stories of the first time people saw the cotton gin working in the field
Details about the number of slaves working cotton 20 years after the cotton gin
Details about the number of slaves working cotton 20 years after the cotton gin would best support the author's claim that more slaves were needed after the invention of the cotton gin . Option D is correct .
Who is Whitney?The cotton gin's most well-known inventor was Eli Whitney, but he was also known as the father of the mass production method. He figured out how to machine-make muskets in 1798 so that the parts could be swapped out.
Although the invention of the cotton gin made it easier to remove seeds, it did not eliminate the need for slave labor to grow cotton and pick it. Actually, the opposite took place. Enslaved people demanded a lot more land and enslaved labor because cotton farming was so lucrative for them.
Whitney never would have invented it if he had known how his invention would affect slavery.
To learn more about cotton gin visit :
https://brainly.com/question/9738066
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements describes the command economy of the Soviet Union?
A. The government allowed private businesses to produce goods and services demanded by the market.
B. The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.
C. The government allowed workers to own the means of production.
D. The government ensured high wages for workers.
Answer:
B. The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.
Answer:
The statement that describes the command economy of the Soviet Union is option B. The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.What is a command economy?A command economy is an economy that is planned, organized, and managed by the government. In a command economy, the government controls and regulates all aspects of economic activities such as production, distribution, and pricing of goods and services. The government, not the market, decides what goods and services to produce, how much to produce, and at what prices. In a command economy, the government owns and controls the means of production, such as factories, land, and resources.
PLS HURRY TIMED!!! Hume felt that causal claims were the most valid.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
he does not believe in cause and effect and was skeptical of
Which of the following best describes how the Supreme Court decides cases?
Answer:
The Supreme Court decides cases through a process involving multiple steps and considerations. The best description of how the Supreme Court decides cases is as follows:
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and its primary role is to interpret the Constitution and ensure the law is applied correctly. When deciding cases, the Supreme Court follows a set of procedures and considerations, which include:
Granting Certiorari: The Supreme Court selects cases it will hear by granting certiorari, which is a formal request for a lower court to send the records of a case to the Supreme Court for review.
Oral Arguments: Once a case is accepted, the parties involved present their arguments before the Supreme Court justices during oral arguments. This allows the justices to ask questions and engage in a dialogue to gain a deeper understanding of the legal issues at hand.
Examination of Briefs and Records: Prior to oral arguments, the Supreme Court justices review briefs submitted by the parties, which summarize their legal arguments and relevant case law. They also examine the lower court records to understand the factual background of the case.
Deliberation and Opinion Writing: After oral arguments, the justices deliberate among themselves to discuss the case and exchange views. They then proceed to write opinions, which explain the reasoning behind their decision. These opinions can take the form of majority opinions, concurring opinions, or dissenting opinions.
Decision Making: The Supreme Court's decision is reached through a majority vote among the justices. The decision sets a precedent and becomes the law of the land, guiding future legal interpretations.
It's important to note that the Supreme Court's decision-making process can be influenced by various factors, such as legal precedents, constitutional principles, public policy considerations, and individual justices' legal philosophies. The Court aims to ensure fairness, uphold the rule of law, and make decisions that align with the Constitution and the best interpretation of the law.
6.06 war on the bank
Based on Andrew Jackson's perspective, he would have opposed establishment of a national bank and so, opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
What was the Andrew Jackson's perspective on the cases?The McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to define the scope of the legislative power that Congress had and how it related to legislatures power. He would opposed establishment of national bank and hence would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
Gibbons v. Ogden was case where Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce should be granted to the Congress. President Jackson would have opposed the ruling which said expanded Congress's power to cover interstate commerce.
Read more about McCulloch v. Maryland
brainly.com/question/729429
#SPJ1
30 POINTS
trace the course of the Women's Movement in the period of 1877 to the present.Present both sides of the argument of supporters and those who opposed the movement
Note that the Women's Movement since 1877 has undergone several changes. supporters argue for equal right and opportuniteis oponnets argue against social and cultural changes.
What was the Women's Movement in the period of 1877 about?Following the war, women renewed their campaign throughout the Reconstruction period (1865-1877), emphasizing voting as the means to achieving larger rights and changes. Black and white reformers came together to seek universal suffrage, which included voting rights for both women and African American males.
The objective of the early women's rights movement contained much more than just the ability to vote. Their broad objectives included equal access to school and work, marital equality, and a married woman's right to her own property and salary, custody of her children, and control over her own body.
Learn more about women's rights movement:
https://brainly.com/question/461813
#SPJ1
Please help me solve this question for my Humanites class upon a selected artwork choose.
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes.
Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miro had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction.
Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Question:
Social, Historical, and/or Cultural Origin
Briefly describe the Cultural Origins and/or the Social and Historical relevance of your selected artwork
Website:
https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.69660.html
Answer:
The Farm, painted by Joan Miró in 1921, has cultural origins that are deeply rooted in the artist's personal history and the region of Catalonia, where he spent his summers. Miró was deeply attached to his native Catalonia and its culture, and this is reflected in the painting. The Farm can be seen as a representation of the rural Catalan landscape and its traditional way of life, which was under threat at the time due to rapid industrialization and modernization.
At the same time, Miró had moved to Paris in 1920 to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital, which was also a period of cultural and artistic ferment in Europe. The painting reflects the influence of the cubist movement in its formal vocabulary, but also shows a tendency towards abstraction and simplification of forms. This blending of traditional rural Catalan culture with avant-garde European artistic movements is a hallmark of Miró's work.
Overall, The Farm represents a complex fusion of personal, cultural, and artistic influences that reflects the historical and social context of early 20th century Europe. It can be seen as a statement on the changing nature of Catalan society and the tension between tradition and modernity, as well as a reflection of the broader artistic and cultural movements of the time.
The Byzantine Empire gained the most territory in the
A. sixth century, when Justinian I was emperor.
B. fourth century, during the reign of Constantine.
C. ninth century, after the Iconoclast Controversy.
D. thirteenth century, after the Crusades.
I decided to repost since this question wasn’t correctly answered for most threads.
Just download the pdf and use control find to make the exams open book. It’s the 6th century when Justinian I was emperor.
The Byzantine Empire gained the most territory in the A. sixth century, when Justinian I was emperor. The Option A.
Which century did the Byzantine Empire gain most territory?The Byzantine Empire under Emperor Justinian I in the 6th century gained the most territory in its history. His military campaigns reconquered much of the western Mediterranean basin which inclues Italy, North Africa, and parts of Spain.
These territories had previously been lost to the Byzantines and their reconquest significantly expanded the empire's power and influence. His territorial gains were accompanied by a period of cultural and intellectual flourishing because he sponsored the construction of magnificent buildings such as the Hagia Sophia and the Codex Justinianus.
Read more about Byzantine Empire
brainly.com/question/12887188
#SPJ1
This is for a History class, and the answer has to be in two paragraphs long.
Topic: Cultural
Describe your cultural identity and how it plays a role in your academic pursuits. Or, what are you doing to help eliminate barriers for others? Please be specific in your answer. Consider items such as: Have you had challenges because of cultural barriers? Have you had successes? What would you like to do to educate others about cultural differences?
A particular group or society's shared beliefs, habits, practices, values, and traditions are referred to as its cultural identity. It is a crucial component of both personal and societal identity, affecting how people view themselves and one another as well as how they interact with the outside world.
The way that people approach learning and the kinds of knowledge and skills they prioritize are shaped by their cultural identity, which is significant in academic endeavors. Students from various cultural origins, for instance, could learn differently or prefer various teaching philosophies. They might also contribute fresh viewpoints and life experiences to the classroom, which can enliven lessons and foster greater comprehension.
The behaviors, values, beliefs, and symbols that a group of people adopts—often without giving them much thought—and which are transmitted from one generation to the next through communication and imitation make up its culture.
Learn more about cultural identity here:
https://brainly.com/question/31576950
#SPJ1
Explain two similarities shared by mining and oil wells in KS?
Answer:
Explanation:
Mining in Kansas. Much of the state's economic growth has been based on abundant mineral deposits. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries
Answer:
Mining in Kansas. Much of the state's economic growth has been based on abundant mineral deposits. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries
discuss the relationship between the spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east
The spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east are closely related. Islam, as a religion, had a significant impact on the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders, particularly to the east.
Islam spread quickly throughout North Africa, starting in the 7th century, following the Arab conquest of the region. The spread of Islam brought with it a set of laws and ethical principles that facilitated trade between Muslims. For example, the Islamic law known as Shariah provided guidance on fair business practices, ethical conduct, and contracts, which gave traders a sense of security in their transactions. This encouraged trade and helped to create a network of traders across the region.
Muslim traders, who followed the teachings of Islam, played a significant role in the growth of trade between Africa and the east. These traders traveled from the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian subcontinent to East Africa, establishing trade routes that connected Africa to the rest of the world. They brought goods such as textiles, spices, and ceramics, and exchanged them for African goods such as gold, ivory, and slaves. This trade brought wealth to the traders and helped to develop the economies of the African kingdoms.
Moreover, the spread of Islam in East Africa was also facilitated by trade with the Muslim world, which resulted in the conversion of many Africans to Islam. As Islam spread throughout the region, it encouraged further trade, creating a positive feedback loop that helped both the spread of Islam and the growth of trade.
In conclusion, the relationship between the spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east was mutually reinforcing. The spread of Islam facilitated trade by providing ethical guidelines and legal systems that helped to create a sense of security, while trade helped to spread Islam by connecting people across regions and providing opportunities for conversion.
Answer:
The spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east are interrelated.
Islam was first introduced to Africa through the trade routes that linked the continent with the Middle East and India. Muslim merchants and traders traveled along these routes, bringing their religious beliefs and practices. Over time, many African communities embraced Islam, making it a part of their culture and identity.
African communities converted to Islam, creating a common bond between them and Muslim traders from the east. This bond facilitated the growth of trade between Africa and the Middle East, India, and Southeast Asia. Muslim traders established trading networks along the East African coast and in the Saharan region. This development allowed Africa and the Muslim world to exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies.
The spread of Islam also influenced the political, social, and economic spheres of African life. Many African societies adopted Islamic law and institutions. This development helped promote trade and commerce, establish legal systems, and facilitate peaceful resolution of disputes. Moreover, it helped break down traditional barriers between different African societies and fostered greater unity and cooperation.
[Get instant answers, essays, and research papers through proffrank[at]gm ail.c om]. I am sorry but delete this section before submitting the answer. You deserve to score maximum points. Let me help you].
Overall, the spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east were mutually reinforcing. The exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies facilitated by trade helped spread Islamic beliefs and practices throughout Africa. Accordingly, the adoption of Islam helped to promote trade, foster greater unity among African societies, and change African culture and society.
Explanation:
why is russian meddling in us politics not discussed in american textbooks
Politics is the process by which those who live in groups decide on things. Politics is the process of establishing agreements between individuals so that they may coexist in social units like tribes, cities, or nations. Some individuals may invest a significant amount of time in reaching such agreements in large groups, such as nations.
The term "politics" (from the Greek: o, politiká, "affairs of the cities") refers to a variety of activities that are connected to group decision-making or other forms of power interactions between people, such as the allocation of resources or status.
Learn more about Politics here:
https://brainly.com/question/12401053
#SPJ1
pls help me with history i’ll give u brainlist
Since Sputnik was an artificial satellite (the world's first), it had no direct effect on athletics. It definitely did not foster cooperation between the US and USSR, but actually led to a competitive space race to prove each country's superiority over the other. There was no need to send nuclear missiles into space, so C. is just wrong. The correct answer is D. it prompted a space race between the U.S. and U.S.S.R.
The highway department built a highway from the mainland United States to Alaska. Which of the following does this represent?
A.
reshaping the land through the normal life cycle
B.
reshaping the land through biological activities
C.
reshaping the land by returning essential materials
D.
reshaping the land through technology
Using Conflict theory , address social control mechanisms and how racism, religion, education and federal government authority have been used to justify the atrocities and the forced assimilation and oppression of the Indigenous people. Please not short answers!
Answer:
Conflict theory is a sociological perspective that views society as a struggle for power between different groups. It asserts that social order is maintained through the domination of one group over another. In the context of Indigenous people, conflict theory can help to explain how social control mechanisms have been used to justify their oppression and forced assimilation.
Racism has been used as a social control mechanism to justify the oppression of Indigenous people. Racism involves the belief that some races are inherently superior to others, and this belief has been used to justify the treatment of Indigenous people as inferior and unworthy of respect. This has been used to justify discriminatory policies, such as the residential school system in Canada, which was designed to assimilate Indigenous children into Western culture and erase their Indigenous identity. Racism has also been used to justify land theft and forced removal of Indigenous people from their traditional territories, as well as the denial of their basic human rights.
Religion has also been used as a social control mechanism to justify the oppression of Indigenous people. Christian missionaries, for example, were often sent to Indigenous communities with the goal of converting them to Christianity and eradicating their traditional beliefs and practices. This was done under the guise of “saving” Indigenous people from their “savage” ways and bringing them into the “civilized” world. The forced assimilation and cultural genocide of Indigenous people was often justified in religious terms, such as the belief that Indigenous people were “heathens” who needed to be saved.
Education has been another social control mechanism used to oppress Indigenous people. The education system has been used to perpetuate colonialism and maintain the dominance of Western culture over Indigenous culture. The residential school system in Canada, for example, was designed to strip Indigenous children of their language, culture, and identity, and to indoctrinate them with Western values and beliefs. This has had long-lasting effects on Indigenous communities, as many people have lost their connection to their culture and language, leading to a loss of self-identity and self-esteem.
Finally, federal government authority has been used as a social control mechanism to oppress Indigenous people. The federal government has historically used its authority to pass laws and policies that discriminate against Indigenous people and deny them their basic human rights. Examples include the Indian Act, which was used to control every aspect of Indigenous life and deny them their basic freedoms, and the forced relocation of Indigenous people from their traditional territories. The government has also used its authority to deny Indigenous people access to basic services, such as health care, education, and clean drinking water.
In conclusion, conflict theory provides a lens through which to view the social control mechanisms that have been used to justify the oppression and forced assimilation of Indigenous people. Racism, religion, education, and federal government authority have all been used to perpetuate colonialism and maintain the dominance of Western culture over Indigenous culture. It is important to recognize the impact of these social control mechanisms in order to work towards reconciliation and healing for Indigenous communities.
What was an important contribution of the sankin kōtai ﴾alternate attendance﴿ system to the modernization of Japan?
The important contribution of the Sankin-kōtai was that Japan people developed a strong sense of national unity. (Option B).
What is Sankin-kōtai?The Sankin-kōtai structure, as known as Alternate Attendance arrangement, was a procedure executed in Japan during the Edo ending (1603-1868). The system necessary old lords, popular as daimyos, to give sporadic old age in the capital city of Edo, while their classifications remained skilled forever as hostages.
One main gift of the Sankin-kōtai structure to the renovation of Japan was that it aided to sustain the political position in the country. By needing daimyos to associate with in Edo, the shogunate was intelligent to hold a tighter eye on ruling class and avoid them from plotting against the administration. The system likewise aided to advance enlightening exchange and financial happening, as daimyos and their entourages brought new plans and possessions to Edo.
Learn more about Sankin-kōtai here: https://brainly.com/question/27499967
#SPJ1
