anyone ans this fast its urgent​

Answer:

we understand the truth that all men are equal, an are assured certain rights by god.

Explanation:

Im pretty sure thats

the right one

Answer:

Explanation:

The answer is D

Answer:

Easy, B. Rival

Explanation:

Correct me if i'm wrong!

Answer:

we got rebellious friends

Explanation:

*_*

Answer:

Explanation:

They weren't at risk for being fired from their jobs or evicted from their farms. What obstacles kept most black citizens from being able to vote? ... They wanted to show they were the ones being denied the right to vote.

Answer:

Character vs. society.

Explanation:

Character vs. self: Mr. White knows the dangers of using the monkey's paw, but continues to take the risks. He struggles with conflicting thoughts about whether or not the risks outweigh the pros.

Character vs. nature: Mr. White is punished by interfering with fate.

Character vs. character: Sergeant-Major Morris warns Mr. White about the misfortune that the paw causes by wishing from it. Mr. White ignores his advice and uses the paw anyway.

Corinne was shaken after learning that a fatality occurred during the auto accident

Explanation:

Fatality means an occurence of death. This could explain why Corinne was shook.

Answer:

In Amy Tan's story “Two Kinds,” Jing-mei's mother wants her daughter to live the American Dream. She believes America is the land of endless opportunities.

Explanation:

Alice Munro's short-story “Boys and Girls” is a girl who grows up in the mid- 20th century in Canada. She lives with her family, which consists of her mother, father, and little brother Laird, on their farm, and her life is characterized by different gender roles.

Answer:

Explanation:

The main themes in "The Fall of the House of Usher" are madness, the supernatural, and artistic purpose. Madness: The Usher family has a long history of incest and, as a result, many contemporary Ushers, including Roderick, suffer from insanity

Answer:

1. was your dad

2. began

3. just moved

4. didn't have

5. bought

6. found

Explanation:

The correct options of the blanks are 1. was your dad, 2.began ,3. just moved, 4.didn't have, 5. brought, 6.found.

The past perfect tense is the event happened in the past before another event in the past. For example Daniel left home before Erica got to his house.

The correct answer are :

1.How long was your dad collecting musical instruments, Kate?

2. He began collecting them in the 1980s.

3&4. Yes. But we just moved to a bigger house because we didn't have enough space for this collection in our old place.

5.He brought many amazing instruments, but I think his favorite is a Navajo drum.

6. My dad found it in Arizona about five years ago.

Learn more about tenses here:

https://brainly.com/question/11222622

#SPJ2

Answer: Earhart receiving an award for her accomplishment

Explanation: Then she would have proof that she flew across the Atlantic.

Answer:

by beating their meat with the door being unlocked.

Explanation:

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

The others are opinions.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

to suggest and support an interpretation of literature

Explanation:

to suggest and support an interpretation of literature – this is the correct answer. The literal analysis is careful reading and interpretation of the written piece. The analysis should examine carefully characters, settings, atmosphere, imagery, and plot. The full and scientific analysis should explore the meaning and the ideas behind the written piece, and use the literary theory that fits the work.

to summarize a work of literature in great detail – this is not the correct answer. Literary analysis is not just a summary of the piece.

to evaluate how well a work of literature is written – this is not the right answer. The analysis doesn’t grade up the quality of the piece.

to suggest how a work of literature should be revised – this is not the correct answer. Review or edit are the ones that suggest the revisions.

Answer:

choice D

Explanation:

thats my pick again

(and sorry if I might not be accurate)

Answer:

So if the verb in the sentence is action like something you can do that the verb

And when we talk about subject is is the is the person who is doing the action in the sentence like the person who doing the thing in the sentence

Answer:

It demonstrates the wheather could be dangerous

Explanation:

I know this because i took the test and reviewed it! i hope this helps! :>

Answer:

C

Explanation:

the weather may be dangerouse

uh, ok.

new candy.. children

name, "lil' rascal"

very easy concept :)

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

Oh baby, don't hurt me, don't hurt me

No more

What is love?

Yeah

No, I don't know why you're not fair

I give you my love, but you don't care

So what is right and what is wrong?

Gimme a sign

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, oh, oh

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, oh, oh

Oh, I don't know, what can I do?

What else can I say? It's up to you

I know we're one, just me and you

I can't go on

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, oh, oh

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, oh, oh

What is love?

What is love?

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

Don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

I want no other, no other lover

This is our life, our time

If we are together, I need you forever

Is it love?

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

Yeah, yeah

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, oh, oh

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, oh, oh

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

What is love?

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more (whoa, whoa)

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more (whoa, whoa)

Oh baby, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

No more

What is love?

Answer:

this should help

Explanation:

The author of "The Lady or the Tiger?" never reveals what is behind the door. The princess indicates that her lover should choose the door on the right, however, we know that the princess—like her father—has a “barbaric” streak. Furthermore, we know that she hates the lady behind the door and is sick at the thought of her lover being married to her. Ultimately, it is left up to the reader to decide what they think emerged from the door—a lady or a tiger?Stockton, the author of the work, deliberately did not give us the "right" answer to this question.  Given that, we can guess and surmise and speculate; however, the answer is still, ultimately, a matter of opinion.Think about this people. The story explains about her barbaric nature like her father’s. We are also told that her lover “knows” her true nature. If these things are true, the princess would have directed him to the door with the tiger, but her lover would have known that. Consequently, he would have chosen the door she did not indicate, and he and the beautiful girl would live happily ever after.With all due respect, I think #3 needs to look at the quoted section of text more closely. " How in her grievous reveries had she gnashed her teeth, and torn her hair, when she saw his start of rapturous delight as he opened the door of the lady!" The princess did not want him to find happiness with anyone else. She had a barbaric nature, and she knew that the beautiful young woman had cast glances upon her lover, and she had perceived those glances to be returned. This would not been taken lightly, and it is safe to say it would probably not be forgiven. In addition, let us not forget the "savage blood" that coursed through her and the "barbaric" ancestry she came from, and the fact that she hated the woman behind the door. It would seem that due to her barbaric nature she would have not wanted her lover to find happiness with another woman, and so we could assume she guided him to the door with the tiger.

Now with all that being said, we are told also that her lover ". . . understood her nature. . .", so if that is true then perhaps he would know she might not want any other woman to have him, and he would choose the door opposite the one she directed him to. So if the lady came out, perhaps it was because he outwitted his barabic lover.

According to the given details from the The Lady or the Tiger by Frank Stockton, we can see that there is a relationship between the princess with a mean streak, her lover and the lady behind the door.

As a result of this, we see the events which occured between the savagely jealous princess and her lover when he was confused on the door to enter.

One of the doors contained a lovely lady which the princess did not like and was jealous of, the other contained a tiger, and the princess knew the content of both doors.

Therefore, we can come to the conclusion that the princess would most likely direct her lover to the door that contained the tiger because she was jealous and had a mean streak where she did not want to share.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/14630821

Answer:

the answer is D Tessie Hutchinson

Explanation:

got it right edge 2021

In this excerpt, Tessie Hutchinson represents a new idea that is in conflict with society’s expectations.

People buy numbered tickets for a gambling game called a lottery.

The story, which was first published in the New Yorker in 1948 and then collected in The Lottery and Other Stories, is about a community where a lottery is conducted every year. The destiny of the individual who draws the "winning" slip, however, is not made clear until the story's shocking conclusion.

The power of ritual and tradition is the fundamental theme of "The Lottery." Even though the lottery's original purpose has long since been forgotten, the custom is nevertheless carried out each year. The lottery has been held for so long that only rumours exist regarding its intended use.

Therefore, Option (D) is correct.

Learn more about Lottery, here;

https://brainly.com/question/24016265

#SPJ6

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

Please mark me brainliest:)    Unless the other answer is better! Haha!

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is Britain, during the time of King Arthur

Answer:

I have not gotten the question but from what I understand it's B.

Hope that helps :p

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Shakespeare uses a huge vocabulary, far larger than anyone else including the audiences who saw his plays for the first time in the 16th and 17th centuries. There are inevitably going to be lots of words the reader does not know.

2. Some of the words and phrases he uses are slang or otherwise outdated. Sometimes the words have secondary slang meanings that might go over the reader's head.

3. Shakespeare's sentences are sometimes long, very long, and require a lot of concentration to follow through to the end.

4. Shakespeare wrote a lot of his dialogue in poetry. To many people the idea of people talking in poetry is just weird, but it has the advantage of making what people say much more beautiful, powerful and compelling. Some of the side effects are that the lines are in verse, which gives them a characteristic rhythm (easier to memorize), sometimes results in verbs at the end of a sentence being placed, and involves a lot of similes, metaphors, personifications and all that other poetry stuff. You might find "What light through yonder window breaks? It is the east, and Juliet is the sun" harder to understand than "Hey, isn't that Juliet in that window?" but it is much more beautiful.

5. Shakespeare wrote plays. He meant them to be watched, not read. Unless you are practised in reading scripts, it is very very hard to imagine how the play will look when it is being acted just by reading it. This is, I think, the fact which, more than anything else, makes Shakespeare's plays difficult for people. Often they are the first plays students have read, and they have no clue how to understand what is happening.

Explanation:

Some readers find Shakespeare’s writing difficult to understand because he uses a large vocabulary.

It should be noted that Shakespeare usually users large vocabularies. This made it difficult for some readers to understand his literary works.

Also, some of the words and phrases that he uses are outdated and his sentences are usually long and require a lot of concentration. This made it difficult for some people to understand him.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/18575780

Answer:

italian renaissance artist

Explanation:

its just a simple qustion

Answer: verb phrase

Explanation: are blooming

Answer:

Your answer is- First person

Explanation:

Hope this helps u

Crown me as brainliest

Answer:

Explanation:

2 ( the one with the comma)

Answer:

I know this question was asked a while ago, but that one answer is wrong and I want to put the right one.

The correct answer is C. 3

Answer:

A. The repetition of exclamation marks is part of the poem's lyric structure and conveys that each comparison is highly emotional for the speaker.

Explanation:

In this poem, the use of exclamation marks repeatedly is part of the poem's lyric structure. It actually helps to convey how each comparison is emotional for the speaker.

The speaker compares his separation from his beloved to the desolation of winter. He's been forced to endure the separation. So, such comparison is highly emotional.

he called him baby tuckoo

Answer: A- Baby Tuckoo

Explanation:

Baby Tuckoo

Answer:

Explanation:

I think it is "Thomas Jefferson: The life of a founding Father" because it has

lots of detail and it sounds like it would be a good book.

Hope this helps! <3