False. The statement that "under the international law are the equal dignity rule, statutes and treaties with inconsistent provisions are resolved under the rule that the last in time prevails" is incorrect.
The equal dignity rule is a principle of constitutional law that requires treaties and federal statutes to be treated equally. It means that treaties and statutes should be interpreted and applied in a manner that gives them equal weight and respect. However, when there is a conflict between a treaty and a statute, provision. The equal dignity rule is not specifically a principle of constitutional law that requires treaties and federal statutes to be treated equally. Instead, it is a principle that applies to the interpretation of treaties in international law.
learn more about international law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30349401
#SPJ11
Assess how employment laws contribute to termination of
contracts.
Question:
List the Laws relating to employment, in particular
with regard to Employment Relations Act 2004 and what these
legislatio
Employment contracts outline both employers' and employees' rights and responsibilities. They outline the conditions of employment, including the start and end dates as well as the hours worked, pay, and perks.
Termination by Mutual Agreement: In some circumstances, the employer and employee may decide to end a contract mutually. Negotiations, severance payments, or settlement agreements may be necessary.
At-Will Employment: There is a concept of "at-will" employment in nations like the United States, where either the employer or employee may terminate the work relationship at any time, with or without cause, provided that it does not contravene any other laws (for example, anti-discrimination laws).
Notice Requirements: A number of employment laws stipulate that both parties must provide notice before ending an employment agreement. Observation period.
Learn more about Employment Contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/24191862
#SPJ11
Please provide three scenarios of contractual interpretation, each of which would result in a three potentially different contractual interpretations, depending on if the court used the four corners rule, the modern parole evidence rule, or the California parole evidence rule.
The four corners rule would only apply to the written provisions of a contract for the sale of real estate.
The court would construe a clause stating that the property includes all fixtures and appliances to indicate that all fixtures and appliances are included. However, the court may take into account additional evidence, such as emails or verbal commitments made before to signing the contract, under the modern parole evidence rule. The court may read the contract to exclude particular appliances if there was an earlier email communication concerning their exclusion. Contrarily, the California parole evidence rule prohibits the use of any evidence that is not part of a written contract, which results in a rigorous interpretation of the contract's terms.
Learn more about written provisions here:
https://brainly.com/question/31987975
#SPJ11
What is the impact of social media on the constitutional right to Freedom of expression
Social media has both positive and negative impacts on the constitutional right to freedom of expression.
Social Media provides a platform for individuals to share diverse perspectives and challenge traditional power structures. It enables the rapid dissemination of information, facilitating social and political mobilization.
However, social media also poses challenges such as the spread of misinformation, online harassment, and filter bubbles. Finding a balance between freedom of expression and addressing these issues is crucial.
It requires responsible moderation by social media platforms, the establishment of legal frameworks that protect individuals while preserving free speech and promoting media literacy to navigate the vast online landscape.
Thus, social media's impact on the constitutional right to freedom of expression has its pros and cons.
Learn more about Social media here:
https://brainly.com/question/30194441
#SPJ1
C. A shortage of thyroxine
A shortage of thyroxine means that the body does not produce enough of this hormone.
Thyroxine is an important hormone produced by the thyroid gland that plays a role in regulating the body's metabolism. It is responsible for controlling how quickly the body uses energy and how it produces proteins. A shortage of thyroxine can lead to a condition known as hypothyroidism, which can cause symptoms such as fatigue, weight gain, and sensitivity to cold temperatures. Hypothyroidism occurs when the thyroid gland produces too little thyroxine. This can happen due to a variety of factors, including autoimmune diseases, surgical removal of the thyroid gland, or radiation treatments.
Learn more about thyroxine here:
https://brainly.com/question/13081186
#SPJ11
3. how do the two differ in assessing the dangers to american freedom?
The difference in assessing the dangers to American freedom can be demonstrated by the fact that the two groups may have different criteria for what they consider to be a threat to American freedom.
One group may believe that a lack of economic opportunity is the greatest danger to American freedom, while another may see government intervention in the market as the greatest threat.The two differ in assessing the dangers to American freedom by their perspectives on what constitutes a threat to American freedom. They may disagree on what qualifies as a threat, how severe it is, and what should be done about it. Different individuals and groups may have different criteria for assessing the dangers to American freedom, and may prioritize different factors or issues. Therefore, different groups may come to different conclusions about what the most significant dangers to American freedom are, and how best to address them.
To know more about intervention , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/31580264
#SPJ11
Which of the following includes a provision that requires public companies to set policies to allow executive compensation to be taken back if it was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards?
a. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
b. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
c. The Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 123 R
d. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
The following option that includes a provision that requires public companies to set policies to allow executive political party compensation to be taken back if it was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards is d.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a federal law that was implemented by Congress in 2010 in response to the global financial crisis of 2008. The law consists of 16 sections, each of which seeks to enhance the transparency and accountability of financial markets, minimize systemic risk, and enhance consumer protection. It is one of the most significant financial regulatory reforms in the United States since the Great Depression.The Dodd-Frank Act contains many provisions, including executive compensation clawback rules, which require publicly traded firms to recover executive compensation that was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards. The Act also contains provisions that seek to strengthen the U.S. financial system's transparency and accountability.
Learn more about political party here:
https://brainly.com/question/30901480
#SPJ11
What is considered a prohibited act under new jersey mortgage laws?
Several actions are deemed illegal under New Jersey mortgage regulations. Several instances include:
Equity skimming: Obtaining a mortgage loan or changing the ownership of a property with the goal of earning rent or sales proceeds without paying the mortgage.2. Making false statements: Doing so in connection with a mortgage loan application or related documents by supplying false information or making false statements.Equity skimming and making false statements are two examples of fraudulent activities related to mortgage loans. Here's a brief explanation of each:Making false statements: This fraudulent activity involves providing false information or making false statements during the mortgage loan application process or related documentation. Individuals attempting to obtain a mortgage loan may provide inaccurate details about their income, assets, employment history, or other financial information in order to qualify for a loan they would otherwise be ineligible for. This misrepresentation of information can lead to loan approval based on false premises, potentially causing financial harm to the lender and distorting the mortgage market.
learn more about Several actions here :
https://brainly.com/question/1920992
#SPJ11
Which one of the following control procedures would best prevent fraud? Using budgets. Audits Reconciliations. Proper authorization 1 pts Question 41 1 pts What is the concept behind segregation of duties in establishing internal control? The company's financial accountant should not share information with the company's tax accountant. Duties of middle-level managers of the company should be clearly separated from those of top executives. The external auditors of the company should have no contact with managers while the audit is taking place.
The control procedure that would best prevent fraud is proper authorization. The concept behind segregation of duties in establishing internal control is that duties of middle-level managers of the company should be clearly separated from those of top executives.
Internal control is defined as the organizational policies and procedures put in place to ensure the achievement of management objectives. Segregation of duties (SOD) is an essential internal control principle that aids in preventing fraud, ensuring accuracy, and the ethical application of assets and information. A successful internal control system will have a strong foundation built on this principle. This answer will examine the control procedures that are useful for preventing fraud and explain the concept behind segregation of duties.
The control procedures that are useful for preventing fraud includes; Proper Authorization: This control procedure involves the approval of all transactions, payments, and other financial activities by individuals who have the necessary authority. Any transaction that is not appropriately authorized should not be processed. Using Budgets: Budgets are an effective tool for preventing fraud. The budgeting process serves as an internal control by ensuring that all transactions are subject to review and approval.
Audits: Audits are also useful for preventing fraud. Audits involve an independent examination of an organization's financial records. The primary goal of audits is to identify financial errors, irregularities, and fraudulent activities. Reconciliations: Reconciliations are used to match account balances to ensure that all transactions are accounted for and that there are no errors or discrepancies. The control procedure that would best prevent fraud is proper authorization.The concept behind segregation of duties in establishing internal control is that duties of middle-level managers of the company should be clearly separated from those of top executives. SOD divides key tasks and responsibilities amongst different individuals to prevent fraud, abuse, and errors. Middle-level managers and top executives must be separated from one another to minimize the risk of fraudulent activity.
To know more about Segregation of duties visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31782416
#SPJ11
Occasionally a person will be unjustly enriched at the expense
of another. No express contract exists. A contract can not be
implied from the conduct of the parties, yet it would be unjust for
one individual to be enriched at the expense of the other. A remedy created by law to correct such a situation is called:A. a unilateral contract
B. an executory contract.
C. a quasi-contract
D. an unenforceable contract.
A quasi-contract is a legal remedy designed to address situations when one person unfairly benefits at the expense of another notwithstanding the lack of an express or inferred contrac.
In order to prevent unfair enrichment, courts have developed legal structures known as quasi-contracts that are not actually contracts. They are founded on the fairness principle and offer a remedy when one party would unfairly benefit from another party's benefits if they were permitted to keep them without paying them back.Quasi-contracts are also known as "implied-in-law contracts" or "constructive contracts." They are not based on the mutual intent of the parties to create a contractual relationship but are imposed by the court to prevent unjust enrichment or to provide restitution.
learn more about situations here:
https://brainly.com/question/30349401
#SPJ11
a separate legal system for juveniles was established during the _________ period. a. juvenile court b. crime control c. refuge d. juvenile rights
During the "juvenile court" era, a distinct judicial system for children was created.
Concerns regarding how to treat juvenile offenders' needs differently from adult criminals led to the creation of the juvenile court system in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Instead than focusing on punishment, The establishment of the juvenile court system in the late 19th and early 20th centuries emerged from concerns about addressing the distinct needs of juvenile offenders compared to adult criminals. Rather than emphasizing punishment, the primary goal of the juvenile court system was to focus on rehabilitation, treatment, and support for young offenders. This period marked a notable shift in perception, recognizing the unique circumstances and potential for positive transformation among juvenile offenders.
lean more about judicial system here :
https://brainly.com/question/11690442
#SPJ11
Once a plaintiff determines that she has standing to sue and has chosen the proper court in terms of jurisdiction, she must serve the defendant with a __________ and _________ to put the defendant on notice of the suit. The defendant must then submit his ___________ to the court and indicate any _________ that justify his actions
Once a plaintiff determines that she has standing to sue and has chosen the proper court in terms of jurisdiction, she must serve the defendant with a summons and complaint to put the defendant on notice of the suit. The defendant must then submit his answer to the court and indicate any defenses that justify his actions.
After establishing standing to sue and selecting the appropriate court, the plaintiff is responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and complaint. The summons formally notifies the defendant of the lawsuit and the need to respond. The complaint outlines the specific claims and allegations against the defendant.
Upon receiving the summons and complaint, the defendant must respond by submitting his answer to the court within the specified timeframe. In the answer, the defendant addresses the plaintiff's claims and can raise various defenses to justify his actions. Common defenses may include asserting that the plaintiff lacks sufficient evidence, arguing the statute of limitations has expired, or claiming a legitimate legal justification for the defendant's conduct.
To know more about plaintiff
brainly.com/question/32362772
#SPJ11
After graduating with a degree in Sport and Recreation, Mary set up her own business as a personal trainer. Initially she enjoyed working on her own but due to the downturn in the economy and the impact that this had had on her customer base, she is now looking to change the nature of her business organisation. List and explain the key advantages and disadvantages of Mary’s business and explain the legal authority Mary has in taking decisions.
Mary's business as a personal trainer has both advantages and disadvantages. She has full legal authority in the decision-making.
Some of the advantages are:
Autonomy: Mary has the freedom to make all decisions regarding her business, such as setting her own schedule, determining pricing, and selecting clients.Direct customer interaction: Mary can establish personal connections with her clients, offering personalized attention and tailored training programs.Some of the disadvantages are:
Economic uncertainty: Mary's business may be vulnerable to economic downturns and fluctuations, which can impact her customer base and financial stability.Legal liability: Mary is personally responsible for any legal claims or debts incurred by the business, which puts her personal assets at risk.As the sole proprietor of her business, Mary has full legal authority and autonomy to make all decisions regarding her business operations, including strategic planning, financial management, and customer relationships, without requiring approval from others.
Thus, Mary's way of business has its own pros and cons, while she is having full legal control overall.
Learn more about legal authority here:
https://brainly.com/question/32411416
#SPJ1
Which of the following refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws?
A. Case law
B. Procedural law
C. Substantive law
D. Commercial law
E. Tort law
The answer is option A. Case law refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws.
Case law refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws. As a result, this type of law develops over time, as judges interpret the facts and applicable laws in individual cases, and it becomes an important aspect of the legal system for future cases.Case law is also known as common law, and it may be either binding or persuasive. A binding case is one in which a higher court has decided the issue in question, making it mandatory for lower courts to follow that decision. A persuasive case, on the other hand, is one in which a court decision is not legally binding, but it is seen as relevant and useful in deciding a case.In conclusion, of the given options, case law refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws.
Learn more about judicial here:
https://brainly.com/question/30135176
#SPJ11
criminal law and civil law are both part of the legal system in the united states. how do they differ? responses criminal law has many different levels of punishment and civil law has only one level of punishment. criminal law has many different levels of punishment and civil law has only one level of punishment. only criminal law has been set up to collect compensation since the norman invasion. only criminal law has been set up to collect compensation since the norman invasion. civil law can sentence lawbreakers to prison; criminal law sets the statutes for resolving compensation issues. civil law can sentence lawbreakers to prison; criminal law sets the statutes for resolving compensation issues. criminal law prevents and punishes people breaking the law; civil law deals with disputes and focuses on compensation. criminal law prevents and punishes people breaking the law; civil law deals with disputes and focuses on compensation.
Criminal law and civil law are both part of the legal system in the United States. Criminal law and civil law differ in the following ways: Criminal law deals with cases where people have committed crimes or violated public laws, while civil law deals with cases where one party believes that the other party has caused harm or injury.
In criminal law, the state takes legal action against the offender, while in civil law, the aggrieved party takes legal action against the wrongdoer. Criminal law is designed to prevent and punish people who break the law, while civil law deals with disputes and focuses on compensation. Criminal law has many different levels of punishment, including probation, imprisonment, fines, and even death, depending on the severity of the crime. On the other hand, civil law has only one level of punishment, which is compensation. Criminal law has been set up to collect compensation since the Norman invasion, while only civil law can sentence lawbreakers to prison.
Civil law deals with private rights and remedies, while criminal law deals with offenses that threaten the safety and security of society as a whole.
To know more about Criminal law visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28484602
#SPJ11
In 1982, the UN developed the Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The Convention specifically addresses the environment, by adopting the language of Stockholm Declaration 21 to mandate that:
Group of answer choices
States ban the dumping of refuse in the oceans.
States create a sustainable response to the maritime environment.
States be obligated to protect and preserve the marine environment.
States agree to not harvest endangered marine mammals.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was developed in 1982, which deals with ocean-related issues. The Convention specifically addresses the environment, by adopting the language of Stockholm Declaration 21 to mandate that: States be obligated to protect and preserve the marine environment. The correct answer is: States be obligated to protect and preserve the marine environment.
What is the Convention on the Law of the Sea?
UNCLOS, also known as the Law of the Sea Convention, is a treaty that was developed by the United Nations in 1982. It governs all ocean-related activities, from the natural resources that are present in the waters to the movement of ships and vessels on the high seas.It is the most extensive treaty on marine law, and it regulates all matters related to the oceans. UNCLOS provides a universal framework for ocean governance, encouraging all nations to act cooperatively in the oceans.
To know more about Convention visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28464011
#SPJ11
So why do you think that NPM government will provide the covid
vaccine in a short amount of time while the others
not?
There are a few reasons why the NPM government may be able to provide the COVID-19 vaccine in a short amount of time, while others may not like a strong track record and better incentive.
The NPM government has a strong track record of vaccine development and production. The country has a well-established pharmaceutical industry and a strong research base in vaccine development.
This means that the NPM government has the expertise and resources needed to develop and produce a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine in a relatively short amount of time.
The NPM government has a large population, it means that there is a large potential market for a COVID-19 vaccine. This gives the NPM government a strong incentive to develop and produce a vaccine as quickly as possible.
Thus, the NPM government has a higher chance of providing the covid vaccine in a short amount of time, while the others don't.
Learn more about Covid vaccine here:
https://brainly.com/question/30817508
#SPJ1
briefly describe the differences (and any similarities) involved in the following contracts. Topics to cover: Bilateral v. unilateral, written v. oral, terms, consideration, performance, breach, damages, remedies, etc.:
a numbered ticket provided by a valet parking attendant or dispensed by an automated machine at the entrance to a parking structure.
a boilerplate agreement provided by a cellular provider to subscribers or by a bank to credit card account holders.
the oral exchange at a restaurant when a waiter takes your order for dinner.
a formal contract such as a lease agreement for office space.
The differences between the following contracts, Terms, consideration, performance, breach, damages, remedies, bilateral vs. unilateral, written vs. oral, performance, breach, etc.:
a ticket with a number assigned to it that is given by a valet parking attendant or given out by a robotic dispenser at the entry to a parking garage.
a standard contract offered to customers of cellphone providers or credit card account holders by banks.
the verbal conversation that occurs when a waiter accepts your dinner order at a restaurant.
a written agreement, such as a lease for office space.
Learn more about consideration here:
https://brainly.com/question/32361853
#SPJ11
Locate a 1998 Alabama criminal case where the defendant, Clark, appealed his criminal conviction claiming that there was not sufficient evidence to support the conviction and his probation was improperly revoked. a.) What is the citation to the case?
b.) What was the defendant convicted of?
c.) Why was the case remanded?
Must use Westlaw to find information.
In Clark v. State, 724 So.2d 369 (Ala.Crim.App. 1998), the defendant was convicted of third-degree burglary. The case was remanded due to the trial court's error in revoking the defendant's probation, as there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction.
a.) The citation to the case is Clark v. State, 724 So.2d 369 (Ala.Crim.App. 1998).b.) The defendant was convicted of third-degree burglary. c.) The case was remanded because the court found that the trial court had erred in revoking the defendant's probation.Summary of the case:Clark v. State is a 1998 Alabama criminal case where the defendant, Clark, appealed his criminal conviction claiming that there was not sufficient evidence to support the conviction and his probation was improperly revoked. He was convicted of third-degree burglary.The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the trial court's order revoking probation. The court found that the trial court had erred in revoking the defendant's probation. The court held that there was not sufficient evidence to support the conviction and remanded the case.
learn more about more third-degree here;
https://brainly.com/question/14520841?
#SPJ11
Identify the basic concepts and processes of the international legal system.
The international legal system encompasses a variety of basic concepts and processes. Some of the basic concepts and processes of the international legal system include the following:
The sources of international law: International law is derived from a variety of sources, including international treaties and agreements, customary international law, and general principles of law recognized by civilized nations.
The subjects of international law: The subjects of international law include sovereign states, international organizations, individuals, and non-state actors.
The basic principles of international law: The basic principles of international law include sovereignty, state responsibility, the prohibition of the use of force, the peaceful settlement of disputes, the principle of non-intervention, and the principle of non-discrimination.
Dispute settlement: Disputes between states are settled through a variety of means, including negotiations, mediation, and arbitration.
The role of international courts and tribunals: International courts and tribunals are responsible for the interpretation and application of international law in a variety of areas, including human rights, trade, and the law of the sea.
The implementation of international law: The implementation of international law is carried out through a variety of means, including the enforcement of judgments and decisions of international courts and tribunals, as well as through the exercise of diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions.
For more such answers
https://brainly.com/question/32314371
#SPJ8
gender sentencing laws were responsible for the incarceration of women for which of the following crimes prostitution
Gender sentencing laws were responsible for the incarceration of women for the crime of prostitution. In the past, gender sentencing laws were the reason behind the incarceration of women for certain crimes. Prostitution is an example of a crime where women were disproportionately targeted.
The gender sentencing laws led to the imprisonment of women for engaging in prostitution. This crime was perceived as an offense against social norms and moral values. Since women are believed to be more responsible for these values, they were held more responsible for this offense as compared to men. This belief also made it difficult for women to defend themselves in court as it was assumed that they had violated the moral and social code of conduct of the society. In addition to this, the gender sentencing laws were also responsible for incarcerating women for other crimes such as theft, drug abuse, and other similar crimes. However, the impact of these laws was most severe on women who were involved in prostitution. The enforcement of these laws led to the confinement of women in prisons and made it difficult for them to access social, educational, and economic opportunities.
Learn more about sentencing laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/4292707
#SPJ11
The court system is based on a hierarchy of courts and
functions. List four courts AND, in 1-2 sentences,
specify the function for each one.
Supreme Court: As the top court in the legal system, it interprets the Constitution and oversees the consistency of federal law.
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority within a particular legal jurisdiction. It serves as the final appellate court, meaning that it has the power to review and make final decisions on appeals from lower courts, including appellate courts and district courts. The Supreme Court generally focuses on legal issues and questions of law rather than re-examining the facts of a case. Its primary function is to ensure the uniform and consistent interpretation and application of the law within the jurisdiction. The decisions of the Supreme Court set legal precedents that guide future rulings and shape the legal landscape of the jurisdiction.
learn more about consistency here :
https://brainly.com/app/ask
#SPJ11
In the 1984 Sony vs. Universal Studios case, the Supreme Court ruled that
A. Recording broadcast television for later viewing was legal.
B. Home recording of televised movies was an infringement of the rights of moviemakers, due to the loss of potential future revenue.
C. While taping whole programs was acceptable, creating an automated method to bypass television commercials was a restraint of trade violation.
D.Sony was partially liable for the use of their technology to circumvent copyright.
In the 1984 Sony vs. Universal Studios case, the Supreme Court ruled that recording broadcast television for later viewing was legal. Option A.
What was the 1984 Sony vs. Universal Studios case about?
In 1984, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark copyright case. This case, known as Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. or the Betamax case, had been closely watched by the broadcasting and recording industries, as it would have far-reaching implications for both of them.
Sony Corporation was the defendant in the case. Universal Studios, which later became part of NBCUniversal, was the plaintiff. Universal Studios claimed that Sony's Betamax VCRs (videocassette recorders) encouraged copyright infringement because people could use them to record movies and television shows illegally and watch them later. Universal Studios argued that the Betamax VCRs were a form of technology that made copyright infringement much more accessible and convenient and that this was harmful to the creative industries.
The Supreme Court ruled that it was legal to record broadcast television for later viewing using Sony's Betamax VCRs since there was a significant legal application for this technology. This was a victory for Sony and a major turning point for the recording and broadcasting industries.
As a result of this case, the home video rental industry exploded, and more people began to record their favorite TV shows to watch later.
Hence, the right answer is option A.
Read more about Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
What are the Salient Features of Cyber Libel Law RA 10175 and
Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code?
Both the Cyber Libel Law (RA 10175) and Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code deal with several facets of libel, although there are some significant distinctions:
The key elements of the Cyber Libel Law (RA 10175) are:
The scope of RA 10175 is limited to libel committed online, including on social media, the internet, and other online platforms.
Legal jurisdiction: The law is applicable to crimes committed inside the Philippines or wherever the computer system is located.
Penalties: When compared to traditional libel, cyberlibel entails harsher penalties. Those found guilty under RA 10175 may be sentenced to between six months and twelve years in prison as well as penalties.
According to RA 10175, libel encompasses any unlawful or forbidden conduct carried out through a computer system or other electronic device.
Learn more about Article 355 here:
https://brainly.com/question/25133385
#SPJ11
do international treaties have an authority inferior or superior to laws (statutes)1 or the same authority as laws? In other words, on which level of the hierarchy of norms, are the international treaties situated in Turkey ?
International agreements have the same weight as laws (statutes) in Turkey. International agreements that have been ratified by the Turkish Grand National Assembly are considered to be part of Turkish law and to have the force of law.
The Turkish Constitution's Article 90 enshrined this principle. Therefore, in Turkey's hierarchy of standards, international treaties and national legislation are on the same level. They are enforceable before national courts and have personal force. However, if a subsequent statute conflicts with an international treaty, the latter takes precedence under the tenet of lex posterior derogat legi priori (latest law prevails over earlier law).
Learn more about International agreements here:
https://brainly.com/question/30093431
#SPJ11
Question 3 (1 point) The Clean Water Act is a law that... O allows the EPA to monitor point sources of pollution O allows the EPA to monitor nonpoint sources of pollution O allows all government agencies to limit water pollution O allows the EPA to monitor but not litigate when water pollution is found
The Clean Water Act is a law that allows the EPA to monitor point sources of pollution. So, the FIRST option is accurate.
The Clean Water Act (CWA) is a federal law in the United States that grants the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate and protect the quality of surface waters. One of the key provisions of the CWA is the authorization for the EPA to monitor point sources of pollution. Point sources refer to specific, identifiable sources of pollution, such as industrial facilities or wastewater treatment plants, that discharge pollutants into water bodies.
Through the CWA, the EPA establishes and enforces regulations to control and reduce the pollution discharged from point sources. This includes setting permit requirements, establishing water quality standards, and monitoring compliance with those standards. The EPA's monitoring activities under the CWA aim to ensure that point sources are operating within the prescribed limits and taking necessary measures to protect water quality.
To know more about Clean Water Act
brainly.com/question/30304869
#SPJ11
contains CBSA policy on articles imported by or for
universities.
a) D10-14-15
b)D19-6-4
c)D2-1-4
d)D11-4-19
e) D17-1-10
CBSA (Canada Border Services Agency) policy on articles imported by or for universities is D10-14-15. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
This policy provides guidelines and regulations regarding the customs procedures and exemptions applicable to articles imported by or for universities. It outlines the conditions, documentation requirements, and duty-free provisions for educational institutions
Universities should refer to this specific policy document, D10-14-15, to ensure compliance with CBSA regulations and to understand the procedures and privileges associated with importing articles for academic purposes.
Thus, it is essential for universities to consult this policy for accurate information on customs procedures and exemptions related to their specific circumstances.
Learn more about customs exemption here:
https://brainly.com/question/32194751
#SPJ1
analyze some of the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats. please be complete and accurate in your descriptions and analysis. think carefully
The decision to warn third parties is complex and requires careful consideration of the situation to avoid negative repercussions.
When it comes to the requirement of helping professionals to warn third parties of threats, some conflicts might arise. Here are some of the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats. Confidentiality: One of the conflicts that arise is confidentiality. As helping professionals, they are expected to keep the information provided by clients confidential. However, the requirement to warn third parties about threats could lead to breaching confidentiality. Hence, they find it difficult to balance between protecting the client’s privacy and ensuring public safety. Therefore, the requirement to warn third parties could impact the therapeutic relationship. Negative repercussions: Some helping professionals are not comfortable with the requirement to warn third parties of threats because of potential negative repercussions. Finally, the requirement to warn third parties could lead to conflicts when the warning is ignored. There are cases where warning signs were ignored by third parties or were not taken seriously, leading to negative consequences. Hence, it raises the question of what the helping professional could have done differently or whether it was right to warn third parties in the first place. In conclusion, the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats range from mistrust to breaching confidentiality.
Learn more about warn third parties here:
https://brainly.com/question/3246740
#SPJ11
which legal tool is used when the mental health patient is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care?
When a mental health patient is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care, the legal tool that is used is called a healthcare proxy.
A healthcare proxy is a legal tool that is used when a person is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care. It is a legal document that enables an individual to appoint another person to make healthcare decisions for them when they are unable to do so themselves. A healthcare proxy is important for individuals who are incapacitated due to mental health issues or physical disabilities. It is also important for individuals who are facing the end of life and want to ensure that their wishes are respected regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care.
Learn more about healthcare proxy here:
https://brainly.com/question/7742017
#SPJ11
Most state laws with respect to protection of information of a commercial value are based on the:
Most state laws with respect to protection of information of a commercial value are based on the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) is a United States law that specifies the legal treatment of trade secrets. The act, which was published by the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) in 1979, has since been adopted by 48 U.S. states (all but New York and Massachusetts) as well as the District of Columbia.A trade secret is any information that provides an economic advantage over competitors. A trade secret can be anything, such as a formula, design, model, practice, pattern, or compilation of information. To be considered a trade secret, the information must be kept secret and provide economic value to the holder. This is in accordance with the definition of a trade secret provided by the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA).Most state laws with respect to protection of information of a commercial value are based on the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Learn more about Secrets Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/28301036
#SPJ11
Armeen ran a stop sign and hit the Smiths' car, killing their child. He had $1.5 million in insurance. The Smiths offered to settle the case for that amount, but Liberty State, Armeen's insurance company, refused and proposed $300,000 instead. At trial, the jury awarded the Smith's $1.9 million, which meant that Armeen was liable for $400,000 rather than the zero dollars he would have had to pay if Liberty had accepted the Smiths' offer. What is Liberty's liability? Under what theory?
The details and scope of Armeen's insurance policy would determine Liberty State's obligation in this situation. The sum of Armeen's insurance coverage, $1.5 million, appears to be Liberty State's potential financial responsibility based on the information offered.
The legal principle that could result in Liberty State's liability is "bad faith." The need to act in good faith and fairly towards their insured parties is known as the "duty of good faith and fair dealing" in insurance law. When responsibility is logically obvious, part of this duty is to swiftly and reasonably resolve disputes within the policy's limitations. In the event when an insurance provider unreasonable refuses to settle a claim within the policy limitations, exposing the insured party to a bigger.
Learn more about Armeen's insurance policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/32498992
#SPJ11
