Answer:
Forensic nursing bridges the gap between Health Care and law enforcement, serving victims of violence, trauma, and criminal behavior
o guilty
o family services
o health care
o freedom from fear
Hopefully this helps you out!
Have a great day! :)
On Election Day, when voters go to the polls and vote for their choice for president, they are technically voting for a slate of electors who are pledged to a particular candidate. The presidential candidate who receives the majority of votes in a state receives all of that state's electoral votes. (Maine and Nebraska allow proportional distribution of electoral votes, but the states seldom split their electoral votes.) The candidate with the most electoral votes is elected president. Each state would have as many electors as it had senators and representatives in Congress, but members of Congress would be prohibited from being electors. This system is known as the _________________.
a. Parlimentary System
b. Dictatorship
c. Directing voting
d. Elector College
Answer:
d. Electoral College
Explanation:
1. What's the difference between a political and moral issue/decision?
what is 53x4=? for a math sup
Answer:
Explanation:
53 x 4 = 212.
Answer:
212
Explanation:
Tyrone and Angelique see an ad for "freight-damaged dining room tables on sale for $300." They go to the store where Al explains that the damaged tables have been sold.
However, they do have dining room tables for $600 in stock.
Answer:False advertisment
Explanation:
Question 1 of 10
What is the constitutional basis for the implied powers of the federal
government?
OA. They were assumed by the writers of the Constitution to be
necessary for the government to function.
B. They are spelled out in the Bill of Rights.
C. They are allowed by the necessary and proper clause of the
Constitution.
D. They are directly listed in the Constitution.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
In the constitution it tells you the stuff
What did the Court decide in the Egbert v. Boule case? Use complete sentences to explain the factors that led to the Court’s decision.
Answer:
clarify
Explanation:
D
What facts would a parole board be MOST interested in during a parole hearing?
the amount of money the inmate has earned in prison
OB.
the opinions of the inmate's family members
OC. the good behavior of the inmate while incarcerated
OD. the details of the case against the inmate
Reset
Next
The facts that a parole board would be MOST interested in during a parole hearing would be option C, the good behavior of the inmate while incarcerated. Parole boards use parole hearings to determine whether an inmate is eligible for release from prison before serving their full sentence. They will consider a variety of factors when making their decision, but the inmate's behavior while incarcerated is one of the most important. The parole board will want to know if the inmate has participated in any rehabilitation or educational programs, whether they have had any disciplinary issues while in prison, and whether they have shown remorse for their crime. The amount of money the inmate has earned in prison or the opinions of their family members may be considered, but they are unlikely to be as significant as the inmate's behavior and readiness for release. The details of the case against the inmate may also be considered, but they are not the primary focus of the parole hearing.
How does the relationship between the federal government and state
governments differ from the relationship between state and local
governments?
A. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments gives one type of government more power than the
other.
B. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments can produce conflict between the two sides.
C. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments involves sharing some responsibilities.
D. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
which of the following is the equation for determining the coefficient friction
The equation for determining the coefficient of friction is:
coefficient of friction = frictional force / normal force
What is the explanation for the above response?The coefficient of friction is a dimensionless scalar quantity that measures the resistance of two objects to slide against each other.
It is denoted by the symbol "μ" and can be expressed as the ratio of the force required to move one surface over another to the normal force pressing the two surfaces together. In other words, it quantifies the frictional force that acts between two objects when they are in contact and at rest or in motion. The value of the coefficient of friction ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater frictional force.
Learn more about coefficient friction at:
https://brainly.com/question/13828735
#SPJ1
In most states, the post-trial phase requires judges to sentence the convicted using a sentencing table. This means that they cannot go over or under the recommended sentence for that particular crime. Do you think the law should dictate what the sentence for a particular crime should be, or should this be solely at the discretion of the judge? Explain.
Decision on whether or not to have mandatory minimums requires jurisdictions which may choose to implement them for certain crimes while leaving the discretion of the judge intact for others.
Should the law dictate sentences for crimes?There are arguments for or against the idea of mandatory minimum sentences for crimes. Some think that having set sentence for a specific crime takes away the discretion of judges to take into account individual circumstances and result in unjust or disproportionate sentences.
But, some think that they provide consistency and predictability in sentencing which can promote fairness and help deter crime. So, the decision on whether or not to have mandatory minimums requires jurisdictions which may choose to implement them for certain crimes while leaving the discretion of the judge intact for other.
Read more about post-trial phase
brainly.com/question/20334928
#SPJ1
Mapp v Ohio constitutional question
The constitutional question in Mapp v Ohio was whether evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure could be used in state criminal trials.
What happened in Mapp v. Ohio ?The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a suspect's constitutional rights, such as an unreasonable search and seizure, in criminal proceedings.
In this case, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to state law enforcement officers, and that evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure is inadmissible in state criminal trials. This decision had significant implications for the protection of individual rights under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution.
Find out more on Mapp v. Ohio at https://brainly.com/question/30212637
#SPJ1
What suggestions address the issues facing campaigns in regard to campaign finance?
Campaign finance has long been a contentious issue in politics, with concerns about the influence of money in elections and the potential for corruption or unfair advantages. Here are some suggestions to address the issues facing campaigns in regard to campaign finance:
1. Increase transparency: There should be greater transparency in campaign finance, including more frequent reporting of contributions and expenditures, as well as disclosure of donors and their affiliations. This would allow voters to make informed decisions about which candidates and policies they support.
2. Limit contributions: To reduce the influence of wealthy donors and special interests, limits could be placed on the amount that individuals and organizations can contribute to campaigns. This would help level the playing field for all candidates and ensure that elections are not dominated by a handful of powerful donors.
3. Public financing: Providing public financing for campaigns could help reduce the influence of private donors and ensure that candidates have the resources they need to compete. This could be funded through a variety of sources, such as taxes or fees on corporations or other groups that benefit from government policies.
4. Increase enforcement: There should be stronger enforcement of campaign finance laws, including penalties for violations and greater oversight of fundraising and spending. This would help deter candidates and donors from engaging in illegal or unethical practices and ensure that the rules are being followed.
5. Address the role of independent expenditures: With the rise of independent expenditures by outside groups, it is important to address the impact of these groups on elections and ensure that they are not circumventing campaign finance laws. This could involve tighter regulations on these groups or measures to increase transparency around their activities.
Overall, addressing the issues facing campaigns in regard to campaign finance will require a combination of measures, including greater transparency, limits on contributions, public financing, stronger enforcement, and addressing the role of independent expenditures. By taking these steps, we can help ensure that elections are fair, transparent, and free from the undue influence of moneyed interests.
