Answer: 2 years
Explanation:
Answer:
4 years
Explanation:
Answered by the one and only #DrippQueenMo
Two middle school students often wear clothing with slogans like “Vegan All Day, Every Day, “The Moo Moo is a No No,” and “Be Cool, Be Vegan.” The students believe that consuming any animal products, like meat and milk, is bad for health and bad for the environment. They began a campaign to convince all the students in the school to bring lunch from home instead of eating school lunch. Each day greater numbers of students brought their lunch to school and wore pro-vegan clothing. The school suspended the students who began the campaign against the school lunches. School officials said it was a disruption to the school, because food was wasted and cafeteria workers had less to do. The students’ parents complained, saying their students have the right to express their ideas and opinions through their clothing and actions. They brought the case to court on the students’ behalf. The students’ parents lost the case in state district court and so appealed it to their state court of appeals. There they won the case, but the school board appealed the decision to their state-level supreme court. The state supreme court found in favor of the school board. The students and their parents are now appealing the state supreme court’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Which type of expression listed in the First Amendment relates to this case?
examples btw from flvs:
1.press
2.speech
3.petition
4.religious expression
5. assembly
Answer:
It would be related to speech since they were using their shirts/clothing to promote vegan ideals
How did the Nile River affect ancient Egypt’s development?
Answer:
Egyptian civilization developed along the Nile River in large part because the river's annual flooding ensured reliable, rich soil for growing crops. Ancient Egyptians developed wide trade networks along the Nile, in the Red Sea, and in the Near East.
Explanation:
Helped by none other than the #QUEEN herself #DRIPPQUEENMO
Answer:
The fertile delta soil produced enough crops to support the growth of a large civilization.
People settled along the river for access to water.
Explanation:
k12
What is the most likely reason Europe did not invest in education in its African colonies?
African citizens were not interested in education.
O European nations placed little value on education.
O Educating people would slow industrial growth.
O Educated citizens would be harder to control.
Answer:
The answer is educated citizens would be harder to control
Explanation:
if u need to know i am in class and we learned about this already so here
educated people are harder to exploit,
The most likely reason Europe did not invest in education in its African colonies is that educated citizens would be harder to control.
Who is an Educated Person?An educated person is someone who has acquired knowledge through education and use it for the betterment of society.
Europe did not invest in education in its African colonies because they knew educating them would make them to have creative thinking that will make difficult to exploit them, evolve political viewpoint different from theirs, oppose them, and could as a result make them to start demanding for independence.
Since the objective of many European countries was to use the territories of their colonies to get resource, it is likely that Europe did not invest in education in its African colonies since educated people are more difficult to exploit.
Learn about Europe's main interest in Africa here: https://brainly.com/question/21613602.
What factors made it possible for Kush to conquer Egypt?
Answer:
Nubia's natural resources were in demand in Egypt, so they helped Kush grow in wealth and power. Who was Piankhi and why was he important to the history of Kush? He was one of Kush's most successful military leaders. He conquered Egypt.
Explanation: Brainlest plz?
Which phrase best defines civil rights movement?
the fight for the right to vote
the fight to hold political office
the fight for fair treatment for all Americans regardless of race
the fight for lower fares on public transportation
help
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
All of these re good answers but The civil rights movement covered all of these therefore making C the right answer.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
why is joe biden our president
Answer:
because he got elected as president
QUICK!!! I’ll mark brainliest! Why did the U.S. bomb Iraq and Saddam Hussein in 1998?
He attacked his neighbor, Kuwait, without reason.
He refused to comply with U.N. weapons inspectors.
Iraq was planning to start another conflict with Iran.
Iraq was home to several international terrorist groups.
Answer::)
Explanation::)
Why did James K. Polk want
California, and Oregon
Gold had not been discovered there yet, but Polk wanted California and its magnificent San Francisco Bay as the American gateway to trade with China and other Asian nations. Polk was worried that other nations, such as England or France, might take California if the United States did not act.
Drawn by the Willamette Valley and its vast resources, settlers moved west to the Oregon territory (U.S.). President James K. Polk made it his goal to enforce manifest destiny, no matter what the cost. He told the British the Oregon Territory would not be shared and this ultimately led to the Pig War (U.S.).
Answer: Gold had not been discovered there yet, but Polk wanted California and its magnificent San Francisco Bay as the American gateway to trade with China and other Asian nations. Polk was worried that other nations, such as England or France, might take California if the United States did not act. The Oregon Treaty was one of the first successes of Manifest Destiny. The Oregon Territory, was valuable to both the U.S. and Britain. Polk made it his goal to enforce manifest destiny, no matter what the cost. He told the British the Oregon Territory would not be shared and this ultimately led to the Pig War (U.S.).
Explanation:
What was one of the Supreme Court’s worst rulings in the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) ruling?
Answer:
The 1896 supreme court ruling of plessy v. ferguson reinforced an already established American policy of separate but equal, which was just being racist insofar that it segregated African American people
Explanation:
The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy--who was 1/8 black --took a seat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested The Supreme Court ruled that the "separate but equal" provision of the Louisiana law was constitutional. The case established this principle of segregation until it was overturned in 1954 Established "separate but equal", also know as segregation, as constitutional. After this, Jim Crow Laws, laws that discriminated against African Americans, spread across the US and were heavily enforced in the South
tbh I tried to look for it and this is all I got not 100% sure
7. Which expression best explains why settlers
traveled in wagon trains?
a. "Safety in numbers"
b. "Waste not, want not
c. "Too many cooks spoil the broth"
d. "The more, the merrier".
Answer:
a. "Safety in numbers"
Explanation: They stayed in wagon trains together to be more protected and to make sure no one got stolen by Native Americans.
Why is it important that the federal and state governments have separate as well as shared powers? Answer the question in 3-5 quality sentences. Provide examples.
Answer:
Federalism is the separation of power that exists between the states and the federal government. In America, the subject of federalism is one that comes up quite often. This is as a result of the constitution. The tenth amendment is in the constitution and it empowers the state government with any power that is not given to the federal government. There is always a conflict when dealing with the supremacy clause that is in the sixth article.
The clause got interpreted to imply that federal law exceeds state laws. So why is federalism important? We will take a look at some of the reasons why this system is much debated. The American constitution is such that it gives powers to the federal government far beyond the states. The constitution appears to be more concerned about what the states cannot do. Federalism is a system that separates governmental powers into state and federal governments.
Explanation:
PLS HELP ME NOW PLSSSSS I RLLY NEED TO FIX MY GRADES ITS BEEN 2-3 WEEKS WITHOUT MY PHONE I KEEP ON FAILING ON EVERYTHING I RLLY WANT MY PHONE I TRY AND TRY SO HARD MY VERY BEST BUT MY MOM I HATE MY MOM SO MUCH SHE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HOW HARD IS THIS SO JUST PLS HELP ME I NEED MY GRADES TO BE BETTER THERE C's AND D'S NO A's AND NO B'S I HAVE F'S TOO SO JUST PLS HELP ME.....
Answer:
the dog is was leading the sheep and forgot . then the dog started to go home but the owner was looking for the dog and the saw this and then took a photo
Compare how the warring countries conducted the war. In what ways were their (Axis & Allies) conducts similar and in what ways were they different? Could some actions be justified?
Answer:
While the Axis powers committed far worse war crimes that were more numerous than the allies, the allies including the U.K., France, United States, and Soviet Union were no stranger to these acts as well.
Explanation:
While the Axis have the Holocaust, and human experimentation by both Japan and Nazi Germany, the allies had several war crimes committed as well.
Some of these include the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan, firebombing of Dresden, and the Soviet treatment of German civilians and POWs throughout the war.
The only action that can really be justified in any way was the atomic bombs. It made Japan capitulate quickly rather than drawing out the conflict which some historians argue would have caused millions of more military and civilian casualties. It was an extremely violent, and brutal war. As are most.
Explain the difference between President Truman's and Eisenhower's strategies to win or end the
war
Answer:
Truman and Eisenhower were anti-communist and extremely militant but their strategies were opposite to each other.
Explanation:
Both Truman and Eisenhower were anti-communist and extremely militant. However, Truman has more Alliency then Eisenhow. Truman created Organisation of American States (OAS) in 1948 laying down the hemispheres military strategy of defence. He increased the defence expenditure and also created North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949 as response to Stalin's blockade. He opposed the nuclear weapon idea
.
While Eisenhower focussed on slashing the budget thereby promoting More Military and less tresry. His spending led to mass inflation and created New look plan that rely on bombs for warfare
If you take away a law, what have you done to it?
Answer:
you have *repealed* the law
Explanation:
What was the impact of the cooling-off treaties William Jennings Bryan negotiated to resolve disputes between countries?
A.
By encouraging countries to negotiate instead of fighting, they undermined the influence of U.S. military power.
B.
By establishing international commissions, they enabled imperialists to take advantage of disputes between countries.
C.
By calling for disputes between countries to be resolved using diplomacy, they promoted stability and helped prevent wars.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
In your opinion, what do you think life would have been like in the 1950s? How did television and music help to shape
the culture of the 1950s?
How did improved literacy in Europe and Franklin's circulation of Enlightenment ideals impact the world view of the eighteenth century? *
a. Each enabled the poor to reach positions of power
b. Both phenomena allowed more people access to new ideals
c. They both promoted the ruling class and their position of power
d. Both resulted in improved funding for public education
Answer:
b. Both phenomena allowed more people access to new ideals
Which of the following was a result of the War of 1812
Answer:
American patriotism, weakened Native American resistance, and U.S. manufacturing grew.
Explanation:
Should the US have gone to war with Iraq in 2003?
Answer:
It was believed that Saddam Hussain was in Iraq in 2003. He was funding and training terrorist organization as well as arming the country with ***suspected*** WMD's. America later turned the country over to the Iraqi government after an attempt to implement democracy.
Explanation:
What do Johnny and Ponyboy swear they won't do anymore before they fall asleep?
i don’t lnow
Answer:
To stop crying and stop feeling sorry for themselves.
Explanation:I read the book and watched the movie
Which statement BEST explains why the percentage of union membership in nonagricultural jobs today is lower than it was in the mid-1940s?
A.
Waves of recent strikes and economic hardships have caused growing anti-union feelings.
B.
Mediation and arbitration have reduced the need for picket lines and active striking by union members, resulting in decreased interest and awareness of unions.
C.
The risk of losing one’s job due to union membership is too great of a risk in unstable economic times.
D.
The vast improvements already made have reduced the incentive to push for change.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Which of the following represents "The Union?"
A. The North
B. The South
What was a piece of seacoast awarded Poland after World War 1 helped to start
new trade
a population boom
World War II
a depression
Answer:
world war II
Explanation:
Answer:
World War II
Explanation:
Which statements are true of both monologues? Select three options.
The speaker uses sarcasm.
The speaker uses repetition.
The speaker uses imagery.
The speaker uses humor.
The speaker uses parallelism.
Answer:
B. The speaker uses repetition.
C. The speaker uses imagery.
E. The speaker uses parallelism.
Explanation:
The monologues of Brutus and Mark Anthony repeat similar words and expressions such as "ambitious" and "Brutus is an honorable man" several times. The use of imagery is also rampant such as of "tears," "slaves," "ransoms," and others. Both speakers appeal to the emotions, Brutus is trying to convince the crowd that he loved Caesar but hated his ambition while Anthony countered with his grief of losing a good friend especially in the phrase "my heart is in the coffin... I must pause til it comes back to me."
The true statement about both monologues of Brutus and Mark Anthony is that:
The speaker uses repetition.The speaker uses imagery.The speaker uses parallelism.What are the monologues of Brutus and Mark Anthony?The monologues therein repeated similar words and expressions such as "ambitious" and "Brutus is an honorable man" several times.
Hence, the true statement about both monologues includes the speaker uses repetition, imagery and parallelism.
Therefore, the Option B, C and E is correct.
Read more about monologues
brainly.com/question/2516435
Help me with this, I’ll give brainliest
Answer:
both are national
Explanation:
1. What's the "spiritual realm" from the viewpoint of the theory philosophy of religion?
2. What would a shaman say about the interface between the spiritual and the material world?
3. What is the idea of meaning in the viewpoint of a shaman?
Answer and Explanation:
1. the spiritual realm for the philosophy of religion is an environment that is not mathematical, that is, it has no material and where the laws of physics and mathematics do not apply. This world is controlled by the spirits and only they can have access to this place, however, the spirits can interact with the physical world in which we live and can cause both good and bad actions.
2. The shaman would believe that the interface between the spiritual and material world is a very fragile element and that it must be maintained to promote balance between the two worlds, limiting the passage of spirits to the material world and preventing the passage of human matter to the spiritual world. It is important to maintain this interface so that there are no problems in either world.
3. From the point of view of a Shaman, meaning is an idea that brings answers to questions closely linked to the soul of each person, meaning promotes a balance between body, soul and spirit and allows someone to live in fullness and abundance.
After U.S.-led invasions in the early 2000s, Afghanistan and Iraq changed from dictatorships to democracies. Is it right to spread democracy by force? Pair up with a friend and choose opposite sides to the debate. Write your arguments in the spaces below.
Pro Con
Answer:
Although the United States intervened in Iraq after it began its intervention in Afghanistan, it is withdrawing from Iraq first. Therefore, what the United States has and has not accomplished in Iraq will be discussed first.
It must be said to begin with that the United States did achieve some important successes in Iraq. It destroyed the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein — something that the Iraqi population had not only been unable to do on its own, but may not have been able to do later either. If Saddam had managed to transfer power to his sons (who were reportedly just as, or even more, vicious than their father), the regime may have survived for years or even decades.
In addition, the U.S.-led intervention helped the Kurds in northern Iraq. They had suffered terribly under Saddam Hussein but were able to solidify the tenuous autonomy they had achieved (also with U.S. help) after the 1990-91 Kuwait conflict and even build some prosperity in their zone.
Although Iraq’s Arab Sunni tribes were initially hostile to the U.S.-led intervention and fought an insurgent war against it, American forces were eventually able to make peace and work with most of them.
Most important, the United States organized and protected the holding of relatively free and fair elections at both the national and local levels. This allowed Iraq’s Arab Shia majority, which had also suffered dreadfully under Saddam Hussein, to play a leading role in Iraqi politics for the first time.
In addition to these successes, however, the United States has had some noteworthy failures in Iraq. First, the failure to halt the massive violence, looting and infrastructure breakdown that took place throughout the country immediately after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. This was caused by the Bush administration’s failure to anticipate and plan for the aftermath of Saddam’s downfall as well as to deploy enough troops to maintain order. As a result, the initial gratitude displayed by much of the Iraqi population toward the United States for delivering it from Saddam quickly disappeared.
Further, despite a massive troop presence, the United States was unable to prevent or stop the large-scale ethnic-cleansing campaigns that violent Arab Sunni and Arab Shia groups conducted against each other’s communities. These campaigns were so successful that some observers attributed the decline in violence in Iraq in 2008-09 not to the American troop surge ordered by President Bush, but to the ethnic-cleansing campaigns having largely completed the violent work of segregating the Sunni and the Shia communities from each other.
Explanation:
1. What are 4 amendments that dealt with voting and what did each of them change?
Answer:
Explanation:Several constitutional amendments (the Fifteenth, Nineteenth, and Twenty-sixth specifically) require that voting rights of U.S. citizens cannot be abridged on account of race, color, previous condition of servitude, sex, or age (18 and older); the constitution as originally written did not establish any such rights ...
Voting is a method for a group, such as a meeting or an electorate, in order to make a collective decision or express an opinion usually following discussions, ...
2. When did di Coppo di Stefano Buonaiuti write the Florentine Chronicle?
Answer:
1370s
Fuente: Marchionne di Coppo di Stefano Buonaiuti nació en Florencia en 1336 y vivió allí la mayor parte de su vida. Escribió la Crónica florentina a finales de la década de 1370 y principios de la de 1380.
1370s
Source: Marchionne di Coppo di Stefano Buonaiuti was born in Florence in 1336 and lived there most his life. He wrote the Florentine Chronicle in the late 1370s and early 1380s.
hope this help you
Answer:
It was written in the late 1370's to the early 1380s.
Explanation:
The author was born in 1336. It is said that he wrote about the Black Death 20 years after he had encoutered it.
