Describe the American judicial systems (civil, criminal, and juvenile), their jurisdiction, development and structure.
Analyze the function and dynamics of the courtroom work group.
Identify judicial processes from pretrial to appeal.
Describe the significant Constitutional Amendments, doctrines, and other sources of law in the American judicial system.
Discuss constitutional freedoms and rights of citizens and explain how an ethical criminal justice system and participatory citizenship protects those freedoms and rights
Demonstrate knowledge of the three major areas of America’s criminal justice system (Police, Courts, & Corrections)
Analyze a criminal case and understand its relevance to protected freedoms and rights.
Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental elements of criminal law.
The concept of the courtroom workgroup was introduced in 1977. It was a radical departure from the public’s view of justice in the courts. In this project, students will complete a 5-page research paper that analyzes the effects of the courtroom work group on the criminal justice system.
The structure of your paper should have a good introduction that presents the topic of the paper and a good thesis statement.
The paper will describe and identify the American judicial system and specifically identify the participants and their roles.
The paper will discuss the traditional role of the courts in light of the Constitutional amendments and laws that grant power to the courts and the traditional theory of justice through the courts.
The paper will define the courtroom workgroup, its participants, and analyze the goals of the group.
The paper will compare and contrast the workgroup goals to the traditional goals of justice through the courts and discuss whether justice is truly being served through the machinations of the workgroup.
The paper has a strong conclusion, summarizing the paper and giving an opinion regarding the overall theme.

An appropriate penalty for violating the city ordinance prohibiting the watering of gardens, flower beds, and yards after the declaration of a drought emergency would be primarily determined by local laws, severity of the emergency. It would include following factors:

1. Review the specific city ordinance for stated penalties: Consult the local laws to find any listed consequences for violations of this nature.

2. Consider first-time offense leniency: If Gill is a first-time offender, a lighter penalty such as a warning or small fine may be suitable.

3. Evaluate the severity of the drought emergency: The penalty should reflect the urgency of the water conservation efforts. In extreme cases, higher fines or mandatory water conservation education may be appropriate.

4. Factor in Gill's lack of knowledge due to vacation: While ignorance of the law is not a defense, the city may take Gill's situation into account and adjust the penalty accordingly.

In summary, an appropriate penalty for Gill's offense would depend on the specific city ordinance, the severity of the drought emergency, and any mitigating circumstances. Possible penalties could range from a warning to a fine or mandatory water conservation education.

To learn more about an ordinance, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20585839

#SPJ11

Senate Bill 4 (SB4) is a state-wide law in Texas that is designed to bar sanctuary cities from existing.

This law seeks to do this by requiring local law enforcement officials to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts and to allow the federal government to enforce immigration laws in local jurisdictions. It also requires local officials to act on behalf of federal immigration agents when asked.

This law is intended to deter illegal immigration and punish local governments that choose to ignore federal immigration laws. By including stiff penalties for noncompliance and by allowing the state to pursue legal action against local officials who fail to comply, SB4 is intended to serve as a deterrent to sanctuary city policies. In addition, SB4 also provides a mechanism for the state to monitor and enforce compliance with the law. This includes the ability to take legal action against sanctuary cities if they fail to comply.

To know more about Senate Bill , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11494587

#SPJ4

Answer:

Rachel's actions could be considered theft or shoplifting, depending on the jurisdiction and laws in the specific location. Taking items without paying for them is considered stealing, and repeated instances of this behavior could be seen as theft.

Additionally, Rachel's actions violate the trust that her employer placed in her as an employee. Even if the items Rachel took were of minimal value, her behavior could be seen as a breach of trust and a violation of her duty to her employer.

In some jurisdictions, the theft of items below a certain value may be considered a misdemeanor, while theft of higher-value items could be considered a felony. The consequences for theft or shoplifting can include fines, probation, and even jail time.

Explanation:

Under the proposed city ordinance, police officers would have discretion when dealing with individuals possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. They could either (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation.

Whether this policy is just and fair depends on various factors, such as the potential for unequal treatment, the prioritization of law enforcement resources, and the impacts on the community. On one hand, allowing officer discretion could lead to inconsistencies and potential biases in how offenders are treated. On the other hand, treating minor marijuana possession as a traffic violation could reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and allow officers to focus on more serious crimes.

As for the impact on police officers protecting the community, this policy could make it easier for them to allocate resources more effectively and concentrate on higher-priority issues. However, if discretion is not applied consistently and fairly, it could create mistrust and tensions within the community. Ultimately, the success of this policy would depend on how effectively it is implemented and monitored.

To know more about the Illegality of Marijuana Possession- https://brainly.com/question/29800924

#SPJ11

To demonstrate that no job is inferior to any other, let's consider two different jobs: a doctor and a janitor. Each job contributes to society in its own unique way, and all are essential for maintaining the well-being of our communities.

A doctor is responsible for diagnosing illnesses, prescribing medications, and providing medical care to patients. Their job is crucial to maintaining the health and well-being of society. On the other hand, a janitor is responsible for maintaining cleanliness, sanitation, and safety in public places like hospitals, schools, and offices.

While some may argue that a doctor's job is superior due to their extensive education and the critical nature of their role, it's essential to recognize the importance of a janitor's work as well. Without janitors, public places would become unsanitary, leading to the spread of diseases and a decline in overall public health. In this sense, the janitor's role is just as vital to maintaining a healthy society as the doctor's role.

Learn more about no job is inferior to any other: https://brainly.com/question/18831347.

#SPJ11

The Monte Carlo fallacy, also known as the Gambler's fallacy, is the mistaken belief that if an event occurs more frequently than expected, it is less likely to happen in the future.

For instance, if a coin lands on heads five times in a row, the Monte Carlo fallacy would lead one to believe that it is more likely to land on tails the next time. This is false because each coin flip is independent and has a 50/50 chance of landing on either side, regardless of previous results.

The Monte Carlo fallacy can lead people to make poor decisions in a variety of contexts, such as gambling or investing. For example, someone may believe that a particular stock is due for a price increase because it has been performing poorly recently. However, this belief is based on the mistaken assumption that past performance predicts future outcomes.

In short, the Monte Carlo fallacy would most likely lead you to believe that future outcomes are dependent on previous results, when in reality they are independent.

To know more about Monte Carlo  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29737518

#SPJ11

Roger Matthews was the most influential British criminologist in all of criminology

Criminology has been a substantial and wide-ranging academic field that compresses abundant hypothetical outlooks and examination regions. To decide on the mainly influential British criminologist is not simple as numerous erudites have produced momentous additions to this domain.

Jock Young, for example, was an early investigator in the area of cultural criminology and also one of the first scholars to investigate the effect of global integration on criminality.

Read more on criminology here:https://brainly.com/question/14317864

#SPJ1

The Eurocentric approach to corrections and punishment focuses on retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, while the African approach emphasizes restorative justice, community involvement, reconciliation, and collective responsibility.

The Eurocentric approach to corrections and punishment typically focuses on the following aspects:
1. Retribution: Punishment is aimed at making the offender pay for their crime.
2. Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to prevent future criminal behaviour.
3. Incapacitation: Offenders are removed from society to protect the public.
4. Rehabilitation: Programs are provided to help offenders change their behaviour and reintegrate into society.

On the other hand, the African approach to corrections and punishment is based on the following principles:
1. Restorative justice: The focus is on repairing the harm caused by the crime and promoting healing for the victim, the offender, and the community.
2. Community involvement: The community plays an active role in the offender's rehabilitation and reintegration process.
3. Reconciliation: The aim is to restore relationships and promote social harmony.
4. Collective responsibility: The responsibility for addressing crime and punishment is shared among individuals, families, and the community.

Learn more about the Eurocentric approach to corrections and punishment: https://brainly.com/question/27175976.

#SPJ11

The STR (short tandem repeat) found within the DNA sequence is "GAT", which is repeated five times in a row. The correct option is D.

In the given DNA sequence "TCATGCGATGATGATGATGATCGCT" The term "STR" stands for "Short Tandem Repeat" which is a nucleotide sequence that repeats. A section of DNA known as an STR is made up of a few nucleotides that are repeated in tandem. The repeated sequence in the given sequence "GAT" appears five times in a row. In forensic science repeating sequences are frequently used to identify people.

It is a particular area of DNA where a short nucleotide sequence repeats several times in a row. Individuals can differ in the number of repeats, which is used as a distinctive genetic marker for identification. The analysis of STRs is used in DNA profiling and genetic fingerprinting to ascertain an individual's genetic make up. The correct option is D.

Learn more about Short Tandem Repeat at:

brainly.com/question/29661522

#SPJ4

Answer:

The students may be charged with vandalism or malicious mischief, which involves damaging or defacing property without the owner's consent. Depending on the severity of the damage, the charges could be a misdemeanor or a felony. In addition to criminal charges, the students could also face disciplinary action from their school, including suspension or expulsion. It is important to note that vandalism is a serious crime and can have long-lasting consequences for the individuals involved.

Explanation:

Yes, Carlos is bound by the agreement by hitting the 'I accept' button he entered in a legally binding contract.

A legally binding agreement is a pact between two or more parties in which they make a commitment to do or refrain from doing something. It may be expressed verbally, in writing or inferred from the actions of the parties. A valid agreement must contain a number of essential components, including an offer, acceptance, consideration, the parties legal capacity, and a legitimate purpose.

Even if he did not read the fine print by clicking the "I accept" button he entered into a legally binding contract with the company selling the tickets. Before accepting an online offer, it is typically taken for granted that the person has read and comprehended the terms and conditions.

It is crucial to thoroughly read and comprehend any agreement before agreeing to its terms whether online or in person.

Learn more about binding contract at:

brainly.com/question/30750666

#SPJ4

The types of illicit drugs that are most likely to result in an ED visit include:

Opioids, including prescription opioids and heroin, are the most commonly reported drugs associated with ED visits. Opioid overdose can cause respiratory depression, decreased level of consciousness, and coma.

Methamphetamine is a powerful stimulant drug that can cause a variety of adverse effects, including hyperthermia, seizures, and psychosis. Synthetic cannabinoids are a type of synthetic drug that can produce effects similar to marijuana. However, these drugs can cause more severe adverse effects, such as seizures, agitation, and psychosis, which can lead to ED visits.

Find out more on ED visits at https://brainly.com/question/28525814

#SPJ1

Cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine are the most common illicit drugs that result in emergency department (ED) visits in the United States.

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the most common illicit drugs that result in emergency department (ED) visits in the United States are cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine.

Other drugs that can result in ED visits include synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones (also known as "bath salts"), and prescription opioids. The reasons for ED visits vary but can include overdoses, adverse reactions, and injuries related to drug use.

It's important to note that illicit drug use can have serious and potentially life-threatening consequences, and seeking help from medical professionals and support services is crucial for those struggling with addiction.

Learn more about illicit drugs on:

https://brainly.com/question/15271242

#SPJ1

The heart of the complaint is generally considered to be the request for relief, which outlines what the plaintiff is seeking from the court. Therefore, Option A) is correct.

The request for relief is typically the most important part of the complaint because it sets out the specific remedy or remedies that the plaintiff is seeking.

The statement of claim provides the background information and details of the dispute, while the court jurisdiction and the name of the parties involved simply identify the court and the parties to the action.

Detailed information on the plaintiff and defendant may be important for establishing jurisdiction or for other procedural matters, but it is not typically the most significant aspect of the complaint.

In summary, the request for relief is the key element of the complaint as it identifies what the plaintiff hopes to achieve through the legal process.

To learn more about the plaintiff, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28425238

#SPJ11

Your pension is determined by your years of credited service, retirement age, and final average salary (FAS).

FAS is the average of your earnings throughout the last 36 months of service when you earned the most. Typically, this is the last three years of employment.

The New York State Common Retirement Fund is a public pension plan for New York State government employees. It is the third largest public pension plan in the country, with $207.4 billion in assets as of 2018.

The New York State Comptroller's office oversees these assets, which are held on behalf of nearly one million members of the New York State and Local Retirement Systems (NYSLRS). Its one-year return was 11.35% as of March 31, 2018, however its 10-year return was 6.4%.

To know more about pension:

https://brainly.com/question/31215595

#SPJ1

Aggravating factors are used in a disciplinary hearing to provide a clearer understanding of the severity of the offence committed by the accused. They are used to highlight any factors that may have contributed to the offence being committed or any actions taken by the accused that may have worsened the impact of the offence. The purpose of aggravating factors is to ensure that the disciplinary action taken is appropriate and proportionate to the offence committed, ensure that justice is served and promote a healthy and productive work environment.

The purpose of aggravating factors in a disciplinary hearing is to:
1. Highlight the seriousness of the offence: Aggravating factors emphasize the severity of the misconduct and help the decision-maker understand the potential impact it has on the organization or individuals involved.
2. Determine the appropriate disciplinary action: By considering aggravating factors, decision-makers can ensure that the disciplinary action taken is proportionate to the offence committed and the circumstances surrounding it.
3. Ensure consistency in disciplinary procedures: Aggravating factors help maintain fairness and consistency by providing a framework for considering and evaluating the severity of different offences in disciplinary hearings.
4. Discourage repeat offences: The inclusion of aggravating factors in disciplinary hearings serves as a deterrent to potential repeat offenders, as they are made aware of the serious consequences that may result from their actions.

In summary, aggravating factors in a disciplinary hearing serve to highlight the seriousness of the offence, determine appropriate disciplinary action, ensure consistency in disciplinary procedures, and discourage repeat offences.

Learn more about the person accused of a crime: https://brainly.com/question/31229571.

#SPJ11

The characteristics that are typically associated with individuals on parole, such as a criminal history, low socioeconomic status, and minority status, can often lead to cultural and racial biases that unfairly impact these individuals.

These biases can lead to discrimination and prejudice, which can negatively affect the ability of individuals on parole to reintegrate into society and obtain employment, housing, and other essential resources.

To counteract these stereotypes, it is important to raise awareness about the negative effects of cultural and racial biases and to promote education and training that emphasizes the importance of treating all individuals with respect and dignity. This can be achieved through various means, including:

Education and awareness campaigns - these can be designed to raise awareness about the negative effects of cultural and racial biases and to promote understanding and acceptance of diversity.

To learn more about  stereotype  here

https://brainly.com/question/361502

#SPJ4

The Fourth Republic in Nigeria and traditional African systems of government share some similarities in their key features. One similarity is the presence of a federal structure with power shared between the central government and regional or local authorities.

In traditional African societies, power was decentralized, and decisions were made at the community level by chiefs and elders. Similarly, the Fourth Republic allows for the devolution of power to states and local governments. Another similarity is the use of consensus-building and consultation in decision-making.

In traditional African societies, decisions were made through communal meetings where everyone's opinion was heard and considered. This is also seen in the Fourth Republic, where the National Assembly and other institutions provide platforms for consensus-building and consultations on important national issues.

Additionally, both systems place a strong emphasis on respect for authority and hierarchy. However, it should be noted that the Fourth Republic is influenced by Western-style democracy and institutions, which differ significantly from traditional African systems of government.

To know more about federal structure visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28263636

#SPJ11

Environmental criminology suggests that crime is not solely the result of individual characteristics, but is also influenced by environmental factors. These factors can include physical features of the environment, such as the layout of streets and buildings, as well as social and economic conditions, such as poverty and inequality.

Based on these factors, a neighborhood with high levels of crime might have characteristics such as:

Poorly maintained or abandoned buildings and public spaces, which may attract criminal activity.

High levels of poverty and unemployment, which can lead to desperation and criminal behavior.

A lack of social cohesion or community involvement, which can make it easier for criminals to operate without fear of detection.

A history of crime and violence, which can lead to a "culture of crime" in the area.

On the other hand, a neighborhood with low levels of crime might have characteristics such as:

Well-maintained public spaces and buildings, which can discourage criminal activity.

A strong sense of community and social cohesion, which can make it more difficult for criminals to operate unnoticed.

Good social and economic conditions, such as low levels of poverty and unemployment, which can reduce the likelihood of criminal behavior.

Good infrastructure and access to services, such as education and healthcare, which can improve overall quality of life and reduce desperation that can lead to crime

To learn more about criminology here

https://brainly.com/question/28996894

#SPJ4

The legal signs of genocide, as defined by the United Nations Genocide Convention, include the intentional and systematic destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. This can manifest in a variety of ways, including killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, refer to a broader category of atrocities committed against a civilian population. This can include acts such as murder, enslavement, torture, sexual violence, and forced displacement. Unlike genocide, crimes against humanity do not require an intent to destroy a specific group but rather are defined by the widespread and systematic nature of the attacks.

In summary, while both genocide and crimes against humanity involve serious violations of human rights and international law, genocide is distinguished by its specific targeting of a particular group for destruction, whereas crimes against humanity are defined by their widespread and systematic nature.

To know more about What is genocide- https://brainly.com/question/23582099

#SPJ11

The legal signs of genocide involve intentionally and systematically destroying a particular racial, ethnic, religious, or national group. According to the United Nations Genocide Convention, genocide includes acts such as killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions designed to bring about the group's physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births, and forcibly transferring children to another group.

Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, encompass a broader range of acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. These acts include murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution, enforced disappearances, and other inhumane acts. While genocide targets explicitly a particular group intending to destroy it, crimes against humanity can be committed against any civilian population without the requirement of a specific intent to annihilate a particular group.

To distinguish between genocide and crimes against humanity, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the acts committed and the targeted population.
2. Determine if there is a specific intent to destroy a particular group (genocide) or if the acts are part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population (crimes against humanity).
3. Analyze the legal signs of genocide, such as the systematic nature of the acts and the specific methods used to destroy the group.
4. Compare the acts and intentions to the definitions of genocide and crimes against humanity under international law.

In conclusion, the main difference between genocide and crimes against humanity lies in the specific intent to destroy a particular group in the case of genocide. In contrast, crimes against humanity involve a broader range of acts against any civilian population. By analyzing the legal signs and the intentions behind the actions, it is possible to distinguish between these two grave international crimes.

To learn more about genocide, visit: https://brainly.com/question/4266491

#SPJ11

Ubuntu is a phrase that comes from the Bantu languages of southern Africa and is frequently translated as "humanity towards others." It is a philosophical idea that places a strong emphasis on the connectivity of all people as well as the value of kindness, empathy, and community.

Ubuntu has become a key value and principle in the creation of a new constitutional order that is based on social justice, human dignity, and the advancement of the common good in the context of transformative constitutionalism.

Ubuntu has been acknowledged as a fundamental value in South African legal doctrine for interpreting and applying the Constitution. The Constitutional Court ruled in the historic case of S v. Makwanyane that the death penalty was unconstitutional since it contravened the ideal of Ubuntu,

To know more about constitutionalism visit :

https://brainly.com/question/4278982

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

There are several factors that can influence which committee a member of Congress joins, including:

The member's personal interests and expertise: Members of Congress may join committees that align with their personal interests or areas of expertise, allowing them to have a greater impact on issues that they care about.

The member's constituency: Members of Congress may also join committees that are particularly relevant to the needs and interests of their constituents. For example, a member representing a district with a significant agricultural sector may join the Agriculture Committee.

The member's seniority: Seniority is often an important factor in committee assignments, particularly in the House of Representatives. Members who have been in Congress longer may have greater opportunities to join high-profile committees.

The needs of the party leadership: The party leadership may also play a role in committee assignments, particularly for members who are seen as potential leaders within the party. Party leaders may try to place members on committees that align with the party's priorities and where they can have the greatest impact on policy.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

The four factors that determine what committee a member of Congress joins are party affiliation, seniority, personal interests, and constituent needs.

Party affiliation is often the most important factor, as committee assignments are usually controlled by the majority party in each chamber. Seniority is also a significant factor, as more experienced members often receive priority in committee assignments. Personal interests can also play a role, as members may seek out committees that align with their expertise or policy goals.

Finally, constituent needs may influence committee assignments, as members may prioritize committees that address issues important to their constituents. Overall, committee assignments are a key way that members of Congress can shape policy and influence the legislative process.

Learn more about Congress: https://brainly.com/question/779570

#SPJ11

Yes, criminal justice is a system of procedures and processes that are designed to protect people, buildings, property, and information from criminal activity.

The criminal justice system includes law enforcement agencies, the courts, and correctional facilities. The primary goal of the criminal justice system is to prevent crime by deterring potential offenders and by punishing those who do commit crimes.

To achieve this goal, the criminal justice system relies on a range of tactics, including investigation and surveillance, prosecution and trial, sentencing, and incarceration. The system also aims to provide support and services to victims of crime and to promote rehabilitation and reintegration for offenders.

The criminal justice system is complex and constantly evolving, and it plays a critical role in maintaining the safety and security of communities.

To know more about criminal justice visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30629034

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

No, Chase Freedom Unlimited does not have foreign transaction fees. This means that you can use your card for purchases outside the United States without incurring any additional fees. However, keep in mind that foreign merchants may charge a fee for using a credit card, which is separate from any fees charged by the card issuer. It is always a good idea to check with the merchant and your credit card issuer about any fees before making a purchase.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Civil law may handle a court case involving negligence, battery, assault, and first-degree murder.

These are a few illustrations of civil wrongs, also known as torts, which cause harm or injury to another person or their property. If a defendant is charged with assault, the case may be heard in a criminal law court. Non-consensual contact is a serious criminal offense  that is typically prosecuted in criminal court.

Falsely drafting a contract or failing to make alimony payments are not crimes and are typically dealt with in civil court or through an alternative dispute resolution process like mediation or arbitration.

Learn more about Civil law at:

brainly.com/question/14788507

#SPJ4

The Supreme Court's ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan was that public figures must prove actual malice in order to establish a claim for defamation.

In other words, the Supreme Court decided that for a public figure to win a defamation case against a news organization, they must demonstrate that the news organization acted with actual malice, meaning they knew the information was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

This decision established a higher standard of proof for public figures in defamation cases, in order to protect the First Amendment rights of the press. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan was a landmark case in the field of American defamation law. It arose out of an advertisement that the New York Times published in 1960, which solicited funds for the civil rights movement in the southern United States.

To know more about Supreme Court, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

A type of organization that focuses on providing activities and socialization for minors is called a youth organization. Unless otherwise noted, most of the organizations on this list are international.

Youth organizations are typically regarded as voluntary, non-profit, youth-led associations. However, in some instances, they may also be led by youth workers or a part of the state apparatus. Most of the time, they are set up to help their members achieve their political, social, cultural, or economic goals. This is finished by executing exercises for youngsters as well as taking part in support work to advance their objectives. Youth organizations typically place an emphasis on safeguarding young people's social and democratic rights; promoting their social and political involvement in community life at all levels; and providing non-formal and informal learning opportunities, as well as leisure activities, voluntary involvement, and opportunities for personal and social development. In 1997, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe issued a recommendation to member states regarding youth civil society.

To learn more about socialization here

https://brainly.com/question/28218484

#SPJ4