Which ideas about ancient Greece is most supported by the map?​

Mahatma Ghandi was a pacifist , he want a world of peace and diplomatic. He was born in 2 october 1869 in British Raj

Answer:John Brown was white man who was born and raised in a free state. Nat Turner was born into slavery. ... John Brown's father was strongly against slavery which resulted in himself being even more against slavery. When comparing the two, John Brown was a more effective abolitionist of slavery

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is B providing access to education

Explanation:

I just did the test

Answer:

Providing access to education.

Explanation:

d) trade competition led to conflict between social classes

Answer: it is d the first person is right.

Answer:

war

Explanation:

In July 1914, when World War I started, the United States vigorously maintained its neutrality. President Woodrow Wilson urged the country as a whole to refrain from being personally or philosophically embroiled in the battle.

One of the deadliest worldwide battles in history, World War I, often known as the First World War, lasted from July 28, 1914, to November 11, 1918. It was fought between two coalitions, the Allies (mainly France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States) and the Central Powers (led by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire). Violence broke out in several countries of Asia,

the Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. 5 million people died as a result of military action, famine, and disease, while an estimated 9 million troops were killed in battle and another 23 million were injured. Genocide claimed millions more lives, and the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 was made worse by the movement of soldiers during the conflict.

Learn more about World War I, from :

brainly.com/question/925121

#SPJ2

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Only the federal government had the right to control interstate commerce.

Explanation:

This case began because New York gave one man a monopoly over the Hudson River, which runs through more than just NY. The case ended up in The Supreme Court with John Marshall as Chief Justice. In the constitution, it stated that the federal government had power over the state government. This meant that the states could not do anything to override the federal government. So, in the end, it was decided that only the federal government could control trade between or across states.

The Mauryan and Gupta Empires were different in several ways. One of the differences between the Mauryan and Gupta Empires is that, unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages. option A is correct.

Option B is incorrect because the Guptas didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; instead, they maintained a highly centralized government. Option C is also incorrect because the Mauryans didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; rather, they maintained a centralized government.

Option D is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas encouraged the construction of public works. Option E is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas relied on a stable government, but they had different ways of achieving it.The Mauryan Empire, which existed from about 322 BCE to 185 BCE, was an ancient Indian empire that was centralized.

The empire was established by Chandragupta Maurya, who defeated Alexander the Great's successors, the Seleucids. Emperor Ashoka was one of the most significant Mauryan emperors. The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire that existed from about 320 CE to 550 CE. The Guptas had a highly centralized administration, and their empire was more extensive than the Mauryans.

The correct option is A.

For more question The Mauryan

https://brainly.com/question/12001220

#SPJ8

Roosevelt believed it was within the power of Congress to change the size of the Supreme Court. Members of both parties viewed the legislation as an attempt to stack the court.

Answer:

Ronald Reagan believed in a free market/laissez-faire policy and was against goverment regulation/interventention. We see this in his advocacy for tax cuts and his strong position against communism.

Answer:

he only way to eliminate poverty is to eliminate the human right that states that everyone has a right to choose whether to attend school or not. I think this is the best solution to eliminate poverty

Explanation:

1. Healthcare is one of the most important factors that needs to be improved if we want to escape poverty. If everyone is sick and dying they won't be able to go to school or do work, and will remain in the cycle of poverty. They won't be able to get educated, they can't go to work and earn money, and they can't do anything to better their standard of living.

2. Sanitation is also super important along with healthcare. With proper sanitation, people wouldn't be getting sick all the time, and there will be better environments for people to work or go to school. People will have the chance to escape poverty faster if only they had good healthcare and proper sanitation + hygiene.

3. Education is the most important thing after healthcare. If people are uneducated, they won't know how to help themselves escape poverty. And without education, they can't get good jobs with sustainable wages. Once the person has education, they will be able to work at a decent job.

These are just my starting points for you. You will have to add facts and reasons yourself. If you can think of anything else that you think adds to the cycle of poverty, feel free to write about it. (Example, you can write about weak government, few natural resources, poor infrastructure, etc.)

Answer: the trading line .

Explanation:

Answer:

done

Explanation:

If people wanted to move into a polis, they would need a citizenship. There were two types of democracy, direct democracy and representative democracy. Direct democracy is when citizens take part in the every day affairs of the government.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

Arguably, the First Amendment is also the most important to the maintenance of a democratic government. It states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The freedoms of speech, press, assembly and the right to petition the government and seek redress of grievances proclaim that citizens have the right to call the government to account. Freedom of speech and press allows citizens to communicate their ideas verbally and in writing, while freedom of assembly lets them publicly express a common interest. The right to petition allows citizens to point out to the government where it did not follow the law, to seek changes, as well as damages for such missteps.

The first amendment basically states all the rights a US citizen has.

Use this link to find your answer

http://ldh.la.gov/

Answer:

Here is what I got for this one.

Explanation:

Hope it helps! :)

Answer:

cuba

Explanation:

Cuba is further West. Puerto Rico is further East. So it is Puerto Rico.

Answer:

D.She wanted to avoid bloodshed.​

Explanation:

After a century of American rule, many native Hawaiians remain bitter about how the United States acquired the islands, located 2,500 miles from the West Coast. In 1893, a small group of sugar and pineapple-growing businessmen, aided by the American minister to Hawaii and backed by heavily armed U.S. soldiers and marines, deposed Hawaii's queen. Subsequently, they imprisoned the queen and seized 1.75 million acres of crown land and conspired to annex the islands to the United States.

On January 17, 1893, the conspirators announced the overthrow of the queen's government. To avoid bloodshed, Queen Lydia Kamakaeha Liliuokalani yielded her sovereignty and called upon the U.S. government "to undo the actions of its representatives." The U.S. government refused to help her regain her throne. When she died in 1917, Hawaii was an American territory. In 1959, Hawaii became the 50th state after a plebiscite in which 90 percent of the islanders supported statehood.

Answer:      Explanation    I agree

Answer:

In my personal opinion, yes. Now, many people may not agree with this, but I believe that the president should  be able to suspend certain liberties during war time due to the looming threat of an enemy nation and spies. For example, the freedom of speech should be limited during war time in order to prevent the leakage of information to enemy spies. I, myself would rather trade some of our liberties in exchange for better protection of my country and the people.

Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional. Brown v. Board of Education was one of the cornerstones of the civil rights movement, and helped establish the precedent that “separate-but-equal” education and other services were not, in fact, equal at all.

Separate But Equal Doctrine  

In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that racially segregated public facilities were legal, so long as the facilities for Black people and whites were equal.

The ruling constitutionally sanctioned laws barring African Americans from sharing the same buses, schools and other public facilities as whites—known as “Jim Crow” laws—and established the “separate but equal” doctrine that would stand for the next six decades.

But by the early 1950s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was working hard to challenge segregation laws in public schools, and had filed lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs in states such as South Carolina, Virginia and Delaware.

In the case that would become most famous, a plaintiff named Oliver Brown filed a class-action suit against the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, in 1951, after his daughter, Linda Brown, was denied entrance to Topeka’s all-white elementary schools.

In his lawsuit, Brown claimed that schools for Black children were not equal to the white schools, and that segregation violated the so-called “equal protection clause” of the 14th Amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

The case went before the U.S. District Court in Kansas, which agreed that public school segregation had a “detrimental effect upon the colored children” and contributed to “a sense of inferiority,” but still upheld the “separate but equal” doctrine.

READ MORE: The Family That Fought School Segregation 8 Years Before Brown v. Board of Ed

Brown v. Board of Education Verdict

When Brown’s case and four other cases related to school segregation first came before the Supreme Court in 1952, the Court combined them into a single case under the name Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.  

Thurgood Marshall, the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs. (Thirteen years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson would appoint Marshall as the first Black Supreme Court justice.)

At first, the justices were divided on how to rule on school segregation, with Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson holding the opinion that the Plessy verdict should stand. But in September 1953, before Brown v. Board of Education was to be heard, Vinson died, and President Dwight D. Eisenhower replaced him with Earl Warren, then governor of California.

Displaying considerable political skill and determination, the new chief justice succeeded in engineering a unanimous verdict against school segregation the following year.

In the decision, issued on May 17, 1954, Warren wrote that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place,” as segregated schools are “inherently unequal.” As a result, the Court ruled that the plaintiffs were being “deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Little Rock Nine

In its verdict, the Supreme Court did not specify how exactly schools should be integrated, but asked for further arguments about it.

In May 1955, the Court issued a second opinion in the case (known as Brown v. Board of Education II), which remanded future desegregation cases to lower federal courts and directed district courts and school boards to proceed with desegregation “with all deliberate speed.”

Though well intentioned, the Court’s actions effectively opened the door to local judicial and political evasion of desegregation. While Kansas and some other states acted in accordance with the verdict, many school and local officials in the South defied it.

In one major example, Governor Orval Faubus of Arkansas called out the state National Guard to prevent Black students from attending high school in Little Rock in 1957. After a tense standoff, President Eisenhower deployed federal troops, and nine students—known as the “Little Rock Nine”—were able to enter Central High School under armed guard.

READ MORE: Why Eisenhower Sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock After Brown v. Board

Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

Though the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board didn’t achieve school desegregation on its own, the ruling (and the steadfast resistance to it across the South) fueled the nascent civil rights movement in the United States.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

The limited government

Explanation:

In article ||| section 49 A it talks about the limited government restrictions and a little bit of Texas. So in conclusion the limited government restricts the amount of money given to the state. (This is so that some money is saved for emergencies or other states in America).

~ LadyBrain

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.

Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia didn't align with the US or USSR because they were firm believers in the foreign policy of neutrality. They had no special ties or preferences for the Soviet Union or the United States.

The advantage that this gave them was to remain neutral in the face of conflict, which they thought was positive to bring peace to the region during the Cold War years.

These two countries were part of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) that played a key role during the Cold War Years to help bring peace and stabilization

The NAM organization started in 1955 due to the Asia-Africa Conference of Bandung, Indonesia, to the initiative of Asian and African countries such as India, Pakistan, Burma, Indonesia, Ghana, and Ceylon.

Answer:

Bison can run very quickly and have thick outer skin making them difficult to hunt

Explanation:

Answer:

When buffalo became confused, they often did not run. Buffalo hunters took advantage of this and could kill many at a time because they stood still

Explanation: took the test