Answer:
Rule of law.
Hope this helps
__________________ and capitalism are rivals.
Answer:
communism
Explanation:
they ate eachother
What was the point of view of the men acting as puppet and master?
Vietnam had too much influence on the US government.
US imperialism caused the Vietnam War.
The United States would improve Vietnam’s economy.
US strength would help defeat communism.
Answer:B
Explanation:
The correct option is B. US imperialism caused the Vietnam War. In the 1960s, French antiwar activists joined forces with Americans opposed to their government's aggression in response to Vietnamese opposition to American imperialism.
What is cause of the Vietnam War?Since Vietnam was split into a communist North and a democratic South in 1954, the United States has sent money, weapons, and training to the government and military of South Vietnam. When the two sides' tensions reached a point of armed conflict in 1961, U.S. President John F.
With American political and financial help, South Vietnam was maintained as a purportedly democratic republic between 1954 to 1963. In actuality, its governance was hardly democratic. Ngo Dinh Diem, the leader of South Vietnam, asserted that his administration was a democratic one.
Learn more about The Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ5
Which First Amendment right is depicted in the photograph?
A)
right to vote
B)
freedom of press
C)
right to assemble
D)
freedom of religion
Donovan knows that the useful life of the computer he has purchased is 5 years. He bought the computer for $5,500. Its salvage value is $800. How much can
Donovan write off as a depreciation expense each year?
$550
$800
$940
$1,100
Answer: $940
Explanation:
The depreciation expense per year going by the Straight-line depreciation method is calculated by the formula:
= (Cost - Salvage value) / Useful life of asset
= (5,500 - 800) / 5
= $940 per year
$940 will be removed from the value of the asset every year until the 5th year where it will be worth its salvage value of $800.
How did technology make World War I different from earlier conflicts?
Answer:
Technology made WWI different from previous conflicts in that "The destructive technology meant more casualties of war." Technology applied to the fabriu¿cation of weapons to be used in World War 1, produce lethal weaponry that killed millions of people and produce destruction never before seen in other wars.
Explanation:
Answer:
1 Thanks in part to man's technological gains from the industrial revolution, weapons are now being produced that make an offensive war absolute
2 Weapons are now being produced to counter Trench Warfare. The idea is to keep a strong defensive while creating weapons to at least try an offensive.
Explanation:
how long has imperialism existed
Expansionism and centralisation have existed throughout recorded history by states, with the earliest examples dating back to the mid- third millennium BC. However, the concept of imperialism arose in the modern age, associated chiefly with the European colonial powers of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries and New Imperialism.
The main purpose of the Georgia Department of Transportation is to maintain
bridges and roads.
railroad crossings.
airport restaurants.
commuter transit systems.
Answer:
its b!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Explanation:
Answer: B or railroad crossings.
Explanation:
What are the six main proofs of the humanity of Christ?
Answer:
Belief in God the Father, Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and the Holy Spirit. The death, descent into hell, resurrection and ascension of Christ. The holiness of the Church and the communion of saints. Christ's second coming, the Day of Judgement and salvation of the faithful.
Explanation:
How would ancient Egyptian civilization most likely have been affected if the Nile river did not flood anunually
Answer:
If the Nile River did not flood annually in Egypt Civilization there wouldn't have been any cilivilization exist that we know of.
The answer is: A. The civilization would have died out due to lack of food and water.
equator is also known as
5. True or False:
European countries recognized the vast wealth of natural resources in Africa and began to
"Scramble" to colonize valuable areas. *
(1 Point)
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
hope it helps
Why have some historians called the Mongol empire one of the most destructive and brutal empires in history? (Could you write a direct answer instead of attaching a link if possible?)
Answer:
The mongols led by Genghis Khan were very destructive in many aspects but I will name a few. First of all the mongols traveled and destroyed whole villages and territories. Secondly they were absolutely ruthless to the inhabitants and therefore murdered and terrorized them all.
Explanation:
forced separation, often times by race.
a
b
Integration
Segregation
Desegregate
Unite
d
Answer:
Segregation
EXPLANATION: RACIAL SEGERATION!
I think so
how did colonies benefit the parent European country?
A.
Colonies sent raw materials to the parent country and bought the parent country’s manufactured goods.
B.
Colonies sent manufactured goods to the parent country and bought the parent country’s raw materials.
C.
Parent countries sent industry and profits to the colonies.
D.
Colonies sent immigrants and cultural items to the parent country,
born after world war ll, bill clinton was the first person from the________ generación to enter the white hosue.
Answer:
baby-boomer
Explanation:
creating models is less about what you know and more about what you can learn in the process of modeling. TRUE or false
Which is the holy book of Christianity?
A. the Sutras
B. the Bible
C. the Koran
D. the Torah
Answer:
B. The Bible
Explanation:
..Bible.....
Why didn't the United States join the League of Nations?
O A. Republicans in Congress opposed the idea.
O B. Woodrow Wilson rejected the idea.
O C. European leaders did not want America involved.
O D. Democrats in Congress did not support it.
SUBMIT
Answer:
B
Explanation:
help! plz plz plz plz
Answer:
Cuba
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
PLEASE HELP VERY URGENT thanks :)
How did Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin support reform efforts? (6 points)
a
It stirred support for women's rights.
b
It stirred outrage against slavery.
c
It introduced the idea of free public education.
d
It brought the housing crisis to peoples's attention.
Answer:
it stirred support for women's rights
Does a candidate need a lot of money to pay his campaign expenses?
Answer:
It depends on what the candidate is running for.
Explanation:
Local office? Likely not. President? Absolutely. It really depends on what type of candidate they are.
How did the Industrial Revolution impact American economy?
The economy became more industrial and less agricultural based.
The economy became more agricultural and less industrial based.
The economy remained mostly agriculturally based.
The economy remained mostly industrial based.
Question 7 (5 points)
Which crop developed into the main cash crop in the South?
Answer:
I would say the economy became more industrial and less agricultural based for the first one.
For the second one the cash crop was cotton
Explanation:
If u search cash crop south it will come up with cotton, tobacco, rice and indigo. I would say that cotton was their main thing though.
And for the second one I was stuck between the economy became more industrial and less agricultural based, and the economy remained mostly industrial based. I went with the first one cause it seems like America was making more money from manufacturing.
How did President Bill Clinton impact the 2000 presidential election?
Answer:
Explanation:
in the 2000 presidential election. Thus, Clinton's partisan legacy remains complex and uncertain.Additionally, the Clinton presidency will certainly be studied and evaluated in terms of its major domestic success: eliminating the federal deficit and overseeing the strongest economy in recent memory. Although there has been some partisan debate about the extent to which the 1990's boom can be attributed to Clinton, the mainstream interpretation now tends to give great credit to Clinton and his economic team, especially Robert Rubin of the National Economic Council and later the secretary of the Treasury, for uncommon fiscal discipline in 1993. These efforts fueled a period of confidence in the financial markets. What is unclear is whether this great economic success will weigh very heavily in the judgment of future historians, who tend to evaluate Presidents more on enduring programs than on the quality of their budgets; a new national health care system would have been just such a program. Clinton's failure to win that battle may thus loom larger in the judgment of history than the economic successes that benefited Americans of his era. This may be especially true in Clinton's case, since his successor as President, George W. Bush, took steps which reversed the nation's fiscal position, from one of exceptional surpluses to one of exceptional deficits. In terms of foreign policy, the Clinton record is also mixed. One of Clinton's core missions as President, he often said, was to prepare Americans for a world in which global economic forces failed to respect national boundaries. Perhaps his greatest accomplishments, then, came in the area of economic globalization-—establishing several new regimes of free trade, with NAFTA and GATT. Moreover, he and the Rubin Treasury Department, with the important assistance of Treasury Deputy Secretary Lawrence Summers, headed off a number of economic catastrophes in the developing world. But the complexities of the currency problems in Mexico and East Asia may deprive the administration of some of the credit it rightly deserves for resolving these problems. Not many Americans understood, or understand, exactly what was at stake in these arcane currency interventions. Those who watched carefully, however, often claim that the exercise of creative, unilateral executive power in the Mexican peso crisis, when the congressional leadership refused to provide legislative support, was one of Bill Clinton's brightest moments.The President's success in the Balkans will undoubtedly resonate well historically, as the administration helped end a conflict that threatened both the security of Europe and the viability of transatlantic cooperative arrangements. But the failure to act in Rwanda, in particular, seems likely to loom large in future historical evaluations. Clinton's overall management of the immediate post-Cold War environment will certainly endure great scrutiny.Finally, it is probably the case that few Clinton historical retrospectives will get very far before noting that this was only the second American President to suffer the disgrace of impeachment. It is evident from the presidency of his successor that any harm Clinton did to the institution of the presidency was, all things considered, rather meager, as the younger Bush has amassed an extraordinary degree of power in that office. But the damage done to Clinton's place in history is far more pronounced and probably permanent. Future historians will likely evaluate not just what Clinton did, but also what he did not accomplish, because he was tied-up in a second-term struggle for political survival. It is this consideration of "what might have been" that may be Clinton's greatest obstacle to gaining historical stature.
It is difficult to make good judgements about Bill Clinton's permanent historical legacy, but one area of his presidency that researchers are now starting to concentrate on is his influence on the 2000 presidential election.
Vice President Al Gore, Clinton's potential successor, lost the 2000 presidential vote to George W. Bush.
The 2000 presidential election was one of the most bitterly contested in American history, and it was only settled when the Supreme Court chose to halt vote counting in Florida, thereby proclaiming George W. Bush the winner.
As a result, the significance of the President Bill Clinton impact the 2000 presidential election are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on President Bill, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1078885
#SPJ2
Which of these was true of the Roman consuls?
Answer:
You might report this answer but you did name anything so i cant answer your question. sorry
Explanation:
Answer: They commanded the army, convened and presided over the Senate and the popular assemblies and executed their decrees, and represented the state in foreign affairs. In times of crisis they were allowed to appoint a dictator with absolute power. interpret the laws in place of the judges. make new laws instead of the legislature. take over command of the army and navy. As part of their executive functions, the consuls were responsible for carrying into effect the decrees of the Senate and the laws of the assemblies. The consuls were the chairmen of the Senate, which served as a board of advisers.
I sincerely hope this helps :)
I NEED HELP 22+22
Whats wrong with confederacy, how is it racist? whats wrong with all lives matter?
How are these to things wrong! pls explain!!
Answer:
I don't know if this is genuine curiosity but I'll try to provide a full explanation for all questions
22+22=44
The confederacy is viewed as racist by many because it was created as a pro-slavery group. Through being pro-slavery they were being oppresive to African American/POC and viewed these slaves as a lesser form of a human when in reality, they were still people. Those who still celebrate the confederacy and state that the confederacy is the "ideal America" are either being ignorant to what the confederacy stood for or are unknown to the atrocities that the confederacy committed. The confederacy also only existed for 4 years while America has existed for 244 years.
The statement "all lives matter" doesn't neccesarily mean anything wrong. Because it's true, all lives do matter and need to be respected and treated with equal respect. However, the all lives matter movement was created after the black lives matter movement was created. In essence, it was made to silence those who were speaking out about the unfair treatment to Black people through the police force. Because of this the all lives matter movement is frowned upon because instead of speaking up about problems that are specific to people of other races it was made to silence black people specifically.
If you are serious, continue to ask questions and form your own decisions! This is obviously my side of view as it is still considered controversial but I hope it helps :)
Which of the following statements is true?
o During the Gilded Age, there was a great divide between the wealthy and the working class.
During the Gilded Age, the wealthy lived in houses similar to those of the working class.
o During the Gilded Age, men were the only members of society who worked in factories.
Answer:
During the Gilded Age, there was a great divide between the wealthy and the working class.
Explanation:
Answer:A
Explanation:
CAN YOU GUYS GO OUT OF YOUR WAY 2 GIVE ME BRAINLISTWhich bill is Chisholm referring to?
the Equal Rights Amendment
the Equal Pay Act
the Fair Employment Act
the Bill of Gender Rights
Answer:
second one is the coreect answer hope you get it correct
Explanation:
Chisholm is referring to the bill of the Equal Rights Amendment.
What is Equal Rights Amendment?
The Equal Rights Amendment was executed by the US law for providing equal rights to all gender citizens. It provided a reduction in discrimination between men and women in areas of employment, property, and education.
Therefore, the amendment was brought through the fourteenth amendment to end differences in gender-based practices.
Learn more about Bills of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10597547
Question 14 of 25
Which of these became the cheapest and fastest way to travel from the East
Coast to the West in the late 1800s?
A. The new highway system
B. Steamships
C. The transcontinental railroad
O D. Airplanes
What was the U.S. Military rank in the world in 1941?
Explanation:
The U.S. Army went into World War II with an end-strength of just 189,000, ranked about seventeenth in effectiveness among the armies of the world, just behind Romania, wrote Cristopher R. Gable in the U.S. Army Center of Military History publication: "The U.S. Army GHQ Maneuvers of 1941."
Can average citizens change society?
Answer:
Yes, if the average citizens come together to change something like a law.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
