What did freeman meant be saying "allied by bonds that bind"

Answer:

The Supreme Court decides cases through a process involving multiple steps and considerations. The best description of how the Supreme Court decides cases is as follows:

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and its primary role is to interpret the Constitution and ensure the law is applied correctly. When deciding cases, the Supreme Court follows a set of procedures and considerations, which include:

Granting Certiorari: The Supreme Court selects cases it will hear by granting certiorari, which is a formal request for a lower court to send the records of a case to the Supreme Court for review.

Oral Arguments: Once a case is accepted, the parties involved present their arguments before the Supreme Court justices during oral arguments. This allows the justices to ask questions and engage in a dialogue to gain a deeper understanding of the legal issues at hand.

Examination of Briefs and Records: Prior to oral arguments, the Supreme Court justices review briefs submitted by the parties, which summarize their legal arguments and relevant case law. They also examine the lower court records to understand the factual background of the case.

Deliberation and Opinion Writing: After oral arguments, the justices deliberate among themselves to discuss the case and exchange views. They then proceed to write opinions, which explain the reasoning behind their decision. These opinions can take the form of majority opinions, concurring opinions, or dissenting opinions.

Decision Making: The Supreme Court's decision is reached through a majority vote among the justices. The decision sets a precedent and becomes the law of the land, guiding future legal interpretations.

It's important to note that the Supreme Court's decision-making process can be influenced by various factors, such as legal precedents, constitutional principles, public policy considerations, and individual justices' legal philosophies. The Court aims to ensure fairness, uphold the rule of law, and make decisions that align with the Constitution and the best interpretation of the law.

Based on Andrew Jackson's perspective, he would have opposed establishment of a national bank and so, opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.

The McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to define the scope of the legislative power that Congress had and how it related to legislatures power. He would opposed establishment of national bank and hence would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.

Gibbons v. Ogden was case where Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce should be granted to the Congress. President Jackson would have opposed the ruling which said expanded Congress's power to cover interstate commerce.

Read more about McCulloch v. Maryland

brainly.com/question/729429

#SPJ1

Since Sputnik was an artificial satellite (the world's first), it had no direct effect on athletics. It definitely did not foster cooperation between the US and USSR, but actually led to a competitive space race to prove each country's superiority over the other. There was no need to send nuclear missiles into space, so C. is just wrong. The correct answer is D. it prompted a space race between the U.S. and U.S.S.R.

Answer:

refers to the authority of a president to govern as a representative of the people, an authority granted by their successful election to office.

Explanation:

Answer & Explanation:

Various tactics were employed by the United States to undermine Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas during the 19th century. These tactics included a combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force. Some examples of these tactics are:

   Manifest Destiny: The belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States was destined to expand across the North American continent, played a significant role in justifying the erosion of Mexican rights and social structures. This attitude led to widespread support for American expansion into Mexican territories, often at the expense of the Mexican people.

   Economic pressure: American settlers and entrepreneurs moved into Mexican territories, such as California and Texas, and established businesses and farms. This influx of American economic activity undermined the local Mexican economy and displaced Mexican landowners. Additionally, the increasing economic dependence on the United States made it more difficult for Mexico to maintain control over these regions.

   Land policies and dispossession: American land policies in newly acquired territories, like the implementation of the Homestead Act, often favored American settlers over Mexican landholders. These policies led to the dispossession of Mexican landowners and further eroded their rights and social structures.

   Brute force and military action: The United States engaged in military actions, such as the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), to forcefully annex Mexican territories, including California and Texas. The war and subsequent Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo resulted in the loss of a substantial portion of Mexico's territory and further weakened its influence in the region.

   Racism and discrimination: American settlers often held racist attitudes towards Mexicans and other non-white groups. This led to discrimination and violence against Mexican communities, further eroding their rights and social structures. For example, the lynching of Mexicans in Texas by Anglo-American vigilantes was not uncommon during this period.

   Assimilation and Americanization: American authorities and settlers promoted the assimilation of Mexican populations into American society, often at the expense of their cultural identity and social structures. This process, sometimes referred to as "Americanization," involved the imposition of American customs, language, and values on Mexican communities.

These tactics, which combined attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force, significantly impacted Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas, leading to the long-lasting marginalization of Mexican-American communities in these regions.

The spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east are closely related. Islam, as a religion, had a significant impact on the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders, particularly to the east.

Islam spread quickly throughout North Africa, starting in the 7th century, following the Arab conquest of the region. The spread of Islam brought with it a set of laws and ethical principles that facilitated trade between Muslims. For example, the Islamic law known as Shariah provided guidance on fair business practices, ethical conduct, and contracts, which gave traders a sense of security in their transactions. This encouraged trade and helped to create a network of traders across the region.

Muslim traders, who followed the teachings of Islam, played a significant role in the growth of trade between Africa and the east. These traders traveled from the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian subcontinent to East Africa, establishing trade routes that connected Africa to the rest of the world. They brought goods such as textiles, spices, and ceramics, and exchanged them for African goods such as gold, ivory, and slaves. This trade brought wealth to the traders and helped to develop the economies of the African kingdoms.

Moreover, the spread of Islam in East Africa was also facilitated by trade with the Muslim world, which resulted in the conversion of many Africans to Islam. As Islam spread throughout the region, it encouraged further trade, creating a positive feedback loop that helped both the spread of Islam and the growth of trade.

In conclusion, the relationship between the spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east was mutually reinforcing. The spread of Islam facilitated trade by providing ethical guidelines and legal systems that helped to create a sense of security, while trade helped to spread Islam by connecting people across regions and providing opportunities for conversion.

Answer:

The spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east are interrelated.

Islam was first introduced to Africa through the trade routes that linked the continent with the Middle East and India. Muslim merchants and traders traveled along these routes, bringing their religious beliefs and practices. Over time, many African communities embraced Islam, making it a part of their culture and identity.

African communities converted to Islam, creating a common bond between them and Muslim traders from the east. This bond facilitated the growth of trade between Africa and the Middle East, India, and Southeast Asia. Muslim traders established trading networks along the East African coast and in the Saharan region. This development allowed Africa and the Muslim world to exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies.

The spread of Islam also influenced the political, social, and economic spheres of African life. Many African societies adopted Islamic law and institutions. This development helped promote trade and commerce, establish legal systems, and facilitate peaceful resolution of disputes. Moreover, it helped break down traditional barriers between different African societies and fostered greater unity and cooperation.

[Get instant answers, essays, and research papers through proffrank[at]gm ail.c om]. I am sorry but delete this section before submitting the answer. You deserve to score maximum points. Let me help you].

Overall, the spread of Islam and the growth of trade between Africa and Muslim traders to the east were mutually reinforcing. The exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies facilitated by trade helped spread Islamic beliefs and practices throughout Africa. Accordingly, the adoption of Islam helped to promote trade, foster greater unity among African societies, and change African culture and society.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The correct answer is d. all of the above.

New science, psychology, and World War I all played important roles in the shaping of modern art.

New scientific discoveries, such as theories of relativity and quantum mechanics, challenged traditional notions of space and time, which influenced how artists represented the world around them.

Psychology, particularly with the influence of the work of Sigmund Freud, influenced artists to explore the subconscious mind and the inner workings of the human psyche.

World War I and its aftermath had a profound impact on many artists, leading to a shift away from the idealized representations of the past and towards more abstract and fragmented depictions of reality as artists sought to make sense of the traumatic events they had experienced.

Overall, these and other factors contributed to the development of modern art and its departure from traditional forms of visual representation.

Answer:

French

Indians

Explanation:

Correct me if I'm wrong!!

The city of Babylon was a real historical city located in Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq), founded in the 3rd millennium BCE. It was an important cultural and political center in ancient times, and it was famously known for its impressive walls and the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, which were considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.

The story of Babylon, on the other hand, refers to the biblical story of the Tower of Babel. According to the story, the people of Babylon attempted to build a tower that would reach the heavens, but God caused them to speak different languages, causing confusion and leading to the abandonment of the tower. The story is often interpreted as a warning against human arrogance and the dangers of trying to reach too high.

In summary, the city of Babylon is a historical place, while the story of Babylon is a religious or mythological tale that is often used to convey a moral lesson.

~~~Harsha~~~

Answer:

The Farm, painted by Joan Miró in 1921, has cultural origins that are deeply rooted in the artist's personal history and the region of Catalonia, where he spent his summers. Miró was deeply attached to his native Catalonia and its culture, and this is reflected in the painting. The Farm can be seen as a representation of the rural Catalan landscape and its traditional way of life, which was under threat at the time due to rapid industrialization and modernization.

At the same time, Miró had moved to Paris in 1920 to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital, which was also a period of cultural and artistic ferment in Europe. The painting reflects the influence of the cubist movement in its formal vocabulary, but also shows a tendency towards abstraction and simplification of forms. This blending of traditional rural Catalan culture with avant-garde European artistic movements is a hallmark of Miró's work.

Overall, The Farm represents a complex fusion of personal, cultural, and artistic influences that reflects the historical and social context of early 20th century Europe. It can be seen as a statement on the changing nature of Catalan society and the tension between tradition and modernity, as well as a reflection of the broader artistic and cultural movements of the time.

Politics is the process by which those who live in groups decide on things. Politics is the process of establishing agreements between individuals so that they may coexist in social units like tribes, cities, or nations. Some individuals may invest a significant amount of time in reaching such agreements in large groups, such as nations.

The term "politics" (from the Greek: o, politiká, "affairs of the cities") refers to a variety of activities that are connected to group decision-making or other forms of power interactions between people, such as the allocation of resources or status.

Learn more about Politics here:

https://brainly.com/question/12401053

#SPJ1

Answer:

#1 Missouri Compromise

#2 Compromise of 1850

#3 Fugitive Slave Act

#4 Uncle Tom's Cabinn

#5 Kansas-Nebraska Act

#6 Bleeding Kansas

#7 Dred Scott vs. Sanford

#8 Lincoln-Douglas Debates

#9 John Brown's Raid

#10 Lincoln Elected President

#11 Southern Secession

Late, but, hope it helped! :)

So, brainliest? Please.

Answer:

Explanation:

Mining in Kansas. Much of the state's economic growth has been based on abundant mineral deposits. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries

Answer:

Mining in Kansas. Much of the state's economic growth has been based on abundant mineral deposits. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries

Option (d), Antitrust laws and laissez-faire economics were created to control out-of-control corporate growth.

Businesses operate with more flexibility under a free-market economy because there are fewer government prohibitions that would complicate doing business. In this environment, businesses are more inclined to take risks and make economic investments.

Antitrust laws are the regulations that regulate the market and how it operates. The objectives of these laws are to prevent monopolies and to reduce unfair commercial practices. Although the antitrust laws have been around for more than a century, their primary objective has remained the same: to protect the market's competitive environment for the benefit of consumers by making sure that businesses have strong incentives to operate profitably, keep costs down, and uphold high standards of quality.

Learn more about Antitrust laws: https://brainly.com/question/29588193

#SPJ1

Based on the passage, the result of the changes described is that workers became more interchangeable and were taught to perform only one simple operation. This led to the destruction of the pride that the workman formerly took in his work. Therefore, the correct answer is: Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.

Note that the Women's Movement  since 1877 has undergone several changes. supporters argue for equal right and opportuniteis oponnets argue against social and cultural changes.

Following the war, women renewed their campaign throughout the Reconstruction period (1865-1877), emphasizing voting as the means to achieving larger rights and changes. Black and white reformers came together to seek universal suffrage, which included voting rights for both women and African American males.

The objective of the early women's rights movement contained much more than just the ability to vote. Their broad objectives included equal access to school and work, marital equality, and a married woman's right to her own property and salary, custody of her children, and control over her own body.

Learn more about women's rights movement:
https://brainly.com/question/461813
#SPJ1

Answer:

Conflict theory is a sociological perspective that views society as a struggle for power between different groups. It asserts that social order is maintained through the domination of one group over another. In the context of Indigenous people, conflict theory can help to explain how social control mechanisms have been used to justify their oppression and forced assimilation.

Racism has been used as a social control mechanism to justify the oppression of Indigenous people. Racism involves the belief that some races are inherently superior to others, and this belief has been used to justify the treatment of Indigenous people as inferior and unworthy of respect. This has been used to justify discriminatory policies, such as the residential school system in Canada, which was designed to assimilate Indigenous children into Western culture and erase their Indigenous identity. Racism has also been used to justify land theft and forced removal of Indigenous people from their traditional territories, as well as the denial of their basic human rights.

Religion has also been used as a social control mechanism to justify the oppression of Indigenous people. Christian missionaries, for example, were often sent to Indigenous communities with the goal of converting them to Christianity and eradicating their traditional beliefs and practices. This was done under the guise of “saving” Indigenous people from their “savage” ways and bringing them into the “civilized” world. The forced assimilation and cultural genocide of Indigenous people was often justified in religious terms, such as the belief that Indigenous people were “heathens” who needed to be saved.

Education has been another social control mechanism used to oppress Indigenous people. The education system has been used to perpetuate colonialism and maintain the dominance of Western culture over Indigenous culture. The residential school system in Canada, for example, was designed to strip Indigenous children of their language, culture, and identity, and to indoctrinate them with Western values and beliefs. This has had long-lasting effects on Indigenous communities, as many people have lost their connection to their culture and language, leading to a loss of self-identity and self-esteem.

Finally, federal government authority has been used as a social control mechanism to oppress Indigenous people. The federal government has historically used its authority to pass laws and policies that discriminate against Indigenous people and deny them their basic human rights. Examples include the Indian Act, which was used to control every aspect of Indigenous life and deny them their basic freedoms, and the forced relocation of Indigenous people from their traditional territories. The government has also used its authority to deny Indigenous people access to basic services, such as health care, education, and clean drinking water.

In conclusion, conflict theory provides a lens through which to view the social control mechanisms that have been used to justify the oppression and forced assimilation of Indigenous people. Racism, religion, education, and federal government authority have all been used to perpetuate colonialism and maintain the dominance of Western culture over Indigenous culture. It is important to recognize the impact of these social control mechanisms in order to work towards reconciliation and healing for Indigenous communities.

1. A politician running for re-election who is already in office is known as an incumbent.

2. Over 80% of the time, incumbents win re-election to the House and Senate, with a relatively high percentage of incumbents doing so.

3. The high percentage of re-election for incumbents is due to several factors. He has a track record, name recognition and fundraising advantage. Additionally, incumbents have the power to use their position to aid residents, which has the potential to boost their popularity and make it more difficult for competitors to win voters.

4.The graph shows that incumbents invest more money in their election campaigns than challengers. Incumbents typically spend $3,000, while challengers typically spend $2,800.

5. Candidates had several options for raising money for their election campaigns, including contributions from private citizens, PACs, and party organizations. Although it is less frequent, candidates can also finance their campaigns with their own money.

Learn more about incumbents, here:

https://brainly.com/question/31478528

#SPJ1

Assuming that the term in question is related to a modern concept or technology, the people of the Middle Ages would not have used that term because they did not have the knowledge, technology, or cultural context necessary to conceive of or use that term. The Middle Ages, also known as the Medieval period, lasted from the 5th to the 15th century, and was characterized by feudalism, the rise of Christianity, and the absence of many modern technologies and concepts. Many modern scientific, political, and cultural ideas and inventions did not exist during this time, so it is unlikely that the people of the Middle Ages would have used or understood them in the same way that we do today. Additionally, the languages and vocabularies of the Middle Ages were different from those of modern times, which further limits the likelihood that they would have used or understood the same terms we use today.

1.)The letter in question highlights the strong link between science and colonialism in the early 19th century. 2.) In his letter, he notes that he is able to carry out his work thanks to the assistance of local inhabitants who are essentially treated as his assistants.

1.)This relationship between the British scientist and the local inhabitants of South Africa reflects the wider colonial context of the time. Colonial powers like Britain relied heavily on the knowledge and labor of indigenous peoples to support their scientific and economic endeavors.

This dynamic often resulted in the exploitation of these populations and the perpetuation of racial inequalities.

2.) Moreover, the letter sheds light on the fraught race relations that characterized colonial South Africa. The author notes that the local inhabitants he worked with were "natives" who spoke a different language and were considered inferior to Europeans.

This attitude reflects the deep-seated racism that permeated colonial society and helped to justify the subjugation and exploitation of non-white populations.

Overall, the letter underscores the ways in which science and colonialism were inextricably linked in the early 19th century. It also highlights the deeply troubling race relations that characterized colonial South Africa and the broader colonial project.

For more question on colonialism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9388993

#SPJ11

Answer: A. They harmed local businesses' revenue.

A particular group or society's shared beliefs, habits, practices, values, and traditions are referred to as its cultural identity. It is a crucial component of both personal and societal identity, affecting how people view themselves and one another as well as how they interact with the outside world.

The way that people approach learning and the kinds of knowledge and skills they prioritize are shaped by their cultural identity, which is significant in academic endeavors. Students from various cultural origins, for instance, could learn differently or prefer various teaching philosophies. They might also contribute fresh viewpoints and life experiences to the classroom, which can enliven lessons and foster greater comprehension.

The behaviors, values, beliefs, and symbols that a group of people adopts—often without giving them much thought—and which are transmitted from one generation to the next through communication and imitation make up its culture.

Learn more about cultural identity here:

https://brainly.com/question/31576950

#SPJ1

Answer:

B. The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.

Answer:

The statement that describes the command economy of the Soviet Union is option B. The government decided what goods and services would be produced and supplied to the market.What is a command economy?A command economy is an economy that is planned, organized, and managed by the government. In a command economy, the government controls and regulates all aspects of economic activities such as production, distribution, and pricing of goods and services. The government, not the market, decides what goods and services to produce, how much to produce, and at what prices. In a command economy, the government owns and controls the means of production, such as factories, land, and resources.

The Byzantine Empire gained the most territory in the A. sixth century, when Justinian I was emperor. The Option A.

The Byzantine Empire under Emperor Justinian I in the 6th century gained the most territory in its history. His military campaigns reconquered much of the western Mediterranean basin which inclues Italy, North Africa, and parts of Spain.

These territories had previously been lost to the Byzantines and their reconquest significantly expanded the empire's power and influence. His territorial gains were accompanied by a period of cultural and intellectual flourishing because he sponsored the construction of magnificent buildings such as the Hagia Sophia and the Codex Justinianus.

Read more about Byzantine Empire

brainly.com/question/12887188

#SPJ1

Al Qaeda of the following organizations came into being as a result of the American involvement in conflicts in the Middle East. The correct option is A.

As a result of American engagement in Middle Eastern conflicts, particularly the Soviet-Afghan War in the 1980s, an organization known as Al Qaeda was born. The KGB is the former Soviet Union's intelligence service, and it has nothing to do with the Middle Eastern conflicts. The League of Nations and the United Nations are multinational organizations designed to uphold world peace and cooperation; they have nothing to do especially with American engagement in Middle Eastern crises.

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about Al Qaeda here:

https://brainly.com/question/10449607

#SPJ1

The important contribution of the Sankin-kōtai was that Japan people developed a strong sense of national unity. (Option B).

The Sankin-kōtai structure, as known as Alternate Attendance arrangement, was a procedure executed in Japan during the Edo ending (1603-1868). The system necessary old lords, popular as daimyos, to give sporadic old age in the capital city of Edo, while their classifications remained skilled forever as hostages.

One main gift of the Sankin-kōtai structure to the renovation of Japan was that it aided to sustain the political position in the country. By needing daimyos to associate with in Edo, the shogunate was intelligent to hold a tighter eye on ruling class and avoid them from plotting against the administration. The system likewise aided to advance enlightening exchange and financial happening, as daimyos and their entourages brought new plans and possessions to Edo.

Learn more about Sankin-kōtai here: https://brainly.com/question/27499967

#SPJ1

Daz and his advisors completely overhauled Mexico's infrastructure while he was president by constructing railroads, schools, and other facilities.

El Porfiriato saw fast modernisation and economic expansion in Mexico while also restricting freedom of the press and civil liberties. General Diaz thought that his administration needed to pursue a paternalistic strategy since the Mexican people weren't ready to practice democracy.

In order to create space for commercial interests, Diaz forcibly removed literally millions of Mexicans from their farms and homes. He also violated the civil liberties protected by the Constitution of 1857.

Thus, Daz and his advisors completely overhauled Mexico's infrastructure.

For more information about Mexico, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8977987

#SPJ1

Answer:

The correct answer is OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.

President Reagan initially opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 extension, but he signed it into law after public pressure from the NAACP. The NAACP argued that the law was still necessary to protect the voting rights of African Americans. Reagan signed the extension, but he also called for reforms to the law.