As a lawyer living through the reconstruction era in a southern state 15 years after the US civil war has ended, I believe that Jim Crow laws are illegal. The laws, which were passed in 1866, 1870, and 1875, were created to enforce racial segregation in the South, ensuring that whites were superior to blacks.
The implementation of Jim Crow laws in the Southern states is a blatant violation of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which declares that “no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Jim Crow laws are discriminatory and violate the civil rights of the African-American community. The fact that these laws were passed by the state legislature only highlights the institutional racism that was prevalent during this period.
Jim Crow laws are unconstitutional and a complete violation of basic human rights. Laws like these aim to suppress the rights of black citizens, particularly their right to vote, hold public office, and own property. Jim Crow laws not only deprived black Americans of their constitutional rights, but also paved the way for the rise of white supremacy and racial segregation in America.
As an attorney, it is my duty to fight for the rights of all citizens regardless of their race. In order for our society to move forward, we must reject discriminatory laws like Jim Crow and work towards building a more equal and just nation.
For more such answers on civil war
https://brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ8
The first leaders of the people's republic of korea and the republic of korea, respectively, were:
The first leaders of the people's republic of korea and the republic of korea, respectively, were: Kim II Sung and Syngman Rhee
Who were the leaders of the people's republic of korea?With Syngman Rhee serving as its first president, the "Republic of Korea" legally seized control from the American military on August 15. The "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (Chosn Minjujui Inmin Konghwaguk), with Kim Il Sung as its head of state, was established in the North.
Kim II Sung and Syngman Rhee served as the first leaders of the people's republic of Korea and the republic of Korea, respectively.
Learn more about leaders at;
https://brainly.com/question/12522775
#SPJ1
in the mid-1890s, the american press portrayed the populist party as
In the mid-1890s, the American press portrayed the Populist Party as a radical and dangerous political movement.
The Populist Party, also known as the People's Party, emerged in the late 19th century as a political organization representing the interests of farmers and laborers, particularly in the rural areas of the United States. The party sought to address economic inequalities and agrarian issues through a platform that included demands for monetary reform, regulation of corporations, and the expansion of government power to support ordinary citizens.
However, the mainstream press of the time, which was largely controlled by established political and economic elites, often portrayed the Populist Party in a negative light. The press labeled the Populists as radicals, demagogues, and dangerous to the existing social and economic order. The party's calls for economic and political reforms were often depicted as socialist or even anarchistic, causing fear and concern among the established elite.
To know more about Populist party, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11104572
#SPJ11
"The Melanesian people, as well as other cultures in the Pacific
Islands, were very interested in the Europeans and their
civilization when they began interacting with them. This led to
what is called"
The Melanesian people, as well as other cultures in the Pacific Islands, were very interested in the Europeans and their civilization when they began interacting with them. This led to what is called cultural contact or cultural interaction. When the Melanesian people and other Pacific Islanders interacted with the Europeans, they were fascinated by their language, religion, technology, and lifestyle.
Cultural interaction is the phenomenon where different cultures come into contact and interact with one another. It leads to a cross-cultural exchange of ideas, values, and practices. It occurs when two or more cultures come into contact with each other and exchange their cultures. It's a natural occurrence that takes place when different societies interact with each other. There are several forms of cultural interaction, including trade, migration, tourism, cultural diplomacy, and warfare. Each of these forms of cultural interaction can lead to different outcomes, depending on the nature of the interaction, the context, and the level of cultural exchange involved.
The interaction between the Melanesian people and the Europeans had a significant impact on Melanesian culture. It led to the adoption of European ideas, such as Christianity, modern medicine, and technology. It also led to the decline of some traditional Melanesian practices, such as tattooing and cannibalism.
To know more about Melanesian people visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30156585
#SPJ11
Answer ONE of the following questions in roughly 3 ½-4 pages, double spaced 12 pt font. Make sure to cite your sources! If you are using outside sources (good academic ones, not what you found on Ask, Yahoo, or Medieval History for Kids!), then cite those as well.
Explain the decline of papal power after the 13th century. Did such efforts resolve the situation, or did they make things worse?
This question relates to pages 320-340; 362-367 of your Spielvogel textbook. This is the source you should use and cite.
Answer:
The decline of papal power after the 13th century was a complex process with many contributing factors. Some of the most important factors include:
The rise of national monarchies: In the 13th century, the power of the papacy was at its height. However, in the 14th and 15th centuries, the power of national monarchies began to grow. This was due to a number of factors, including the rise of strong kings, the development of standing armies, and the growth of national economies. As national monarchies became stronger, they began to challenge the authority of the papacy.
The Great Schism: The Great Schism was a period of crisis in the Catholic Church that lasted from 1378 to 1417. During this time, there were two rival popes, one in Rome and one in Avignon. This division weakened the authority of the papacy and led to a loss of faith in the Church.
The Protestant Reformation: The Protestant Reformation was a religious movement that began in the early 16th century. The Protestant reformers, such as Martin Luther and John Calvin, rejected the authority of the papacy and called for a return to the Bible as the sole source of religious authority. The Protestant Reformation led to a major split in the Catholic Church and further weakened its power.
The decline of papal power had a number of consequences. One consequence was the rise of secularism. As the power of the papacy declined, people began to turn to secular authorities for leadership. This led to a decline in the influence of the Church in society.
Another consequence of the decline of papal power was the rise of religious wars. The Protestant Reformation led to a series of wars between Catholics and Protestants. These wars were fought over religious differences, and they caused widespread death and destruction.
The decline of papal power was a major turning point in European history. It led to the rise of secularism, religious wars, and a new balance of power in Europe.
Did such efforts resolve the situation, or did they make things worse?
The efforts to resolve the decline of papal power were largely unsuccessful. The Great Schism was eventually ended by the Council of Constance, but the damage had already been done. The Protestant Reformation was even more successful in challenging the authority of the papacy, and it led to a permanent split in the Catholic Church.
In the end, the decline of papal power was a result of a number of factors, including the rise of national monarchies, the Great Schism, and the Protestant Reformation. These factors combined to weaken the authority of the papacy and led to a new balance of power in Europe.
Explanation:
The decline of papal power in the 13th century and beyond was influenced by various factors. One significant event was the conflict between the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire.
This conflict, which lasted from the 11th to the 12th century, centered around the appointment of bishops and the question of who held the authority to invest them with their ecclesiastical offices. The papacy sought to assert its independence from secular rulers, including the Holy Roman Emperor, leading to a weakening of papal authority. Another factor was the emergence of strong nation-states in Europe, which challenged the papal authority and sought to establish their own religious and political control. The monarchs of countries like France and England sought to limit the power of the papacy.
Learn more about papacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29376501
#SPJ11
In return for protecting allies from invaders, the Shang expected tribute in the form of:
a. horses and cattle.
b. precious metals and gems
c. foodstuffs, soldiers, and workers
d. silk and bronze
In return for protecting allies from invaders, the Shang expected tribute in the form of d. silk and bronze.
The Shang dynasty (1600-1046 BCE) was one of the first historical Chinese dynasties, according to traditional historical texts.
It is said to have been established by a rebel king, Tang, who defeated the Xia dynasty's last king. This period saw many significant advancements, including the use of bronze weaponry, the first writing system, and the beginnings of Chinese literature and philosophy.
In order to protect allies from invaders, the Shang expected tribute. Tribute is something that one country or group gives to another as a sign of respect, submission, or allegiance. The Shang dynasty expected tribute in the form of silk and bronze.
To know more about the word Chinese dynasties, visits :
https://brainly.com/question/2426491
#SPJ11
cuba, guam, and indonesia became american protectorates. truefalse
Answer:
False
Explanation:
While Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines came under American control as a result of the Spanish-American War in 1898, they did not become American protectorates. Cuba gained independence in 1902, Guam is an unincorporated territory of the United States, and the Philippines were granted independence in 1946. Indonesia, on the other hand, was a Dutch colony until it gained independence in 1945 and did not become an American protectorate.
explain the roots of the harlem renaissance, and identify a few of the major artists associated with it.
Harlem Renaissance refers to a cultural and artistic movement that emerged during the 1920s in the Harlem neighborhood of New York City. It was a significant period of African American cultural flourishing, marked by artistic expression, intellectual achievements, and the celebration of black identity.
Artists during this time sought to challenge racial stereotypes, depict the realities of African American life, and promote cultural pride. The Harlem Renaissance served as a platform for creativity, activism, and cultural exchange, leaving a lasting impact on literature, music, visual arts, and social movements in the United States.
Learn more about Harlem Renaissance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30322612
#SPJ12
In at least three paragraphs, write a summary of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Your summary should cover the main ideas of the debates, especially those related to the issue of slavery. You might consider addressing topics like the westward extension of slavery, popular sovereignty, citizenship for Black Americans, the ideas of the Founders, and others.
Each paragraph should begin with a topic sentence that states the main idea of the paragraph. In each paragraph, support your main idea with two to three supporting detailed sentences. Finally, finish each paragraph with a concluding sentence that ties together the paragraph's ideas. Be sure to pay attention to spelling, grammar, and writing mechanics. (30 points)
The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates held in 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, who were running for the U.S. Senate from Illinois. The main issue of the debates was slavery and its expansion into the western territories. Douglas was a proponent of popular sovereignty, which allowed the settlers of a territory to decide whether or not to allow slavery, while Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery into the territories. The debates were widely covered in the press and helped to raise the profile of both candidates, as well as to bring the issue of slavery to the forefront of national politics.
In the first debate, Lincoln argued that the Founders had intended to limit the spread of slavery and that the Missouri Compromise had established a precedent for keeping slavery out of the western territories. Douglas countered that popular sovereignty was the best way to resolve the slavery issue and accused Lincoln of being an abolitionist. In the second debate, Lincoln continued to argue against the extension of slavery and emphasized the moral wrongness of the institution. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's position as extreme and suggesting that it would lead to civil war.
In the fifth debate, Lincoln questioned Douglas's commitment to popular sovereignty and accused him of supporting the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which had upheld the right to own slaves as property. Lincoln argued that the decision was a threat to the rights of free blacks and that it was the duty of Congress to prevent the spread of slavery. Douglas responded by defending theDred Scott decision and arguing that the Constitution protected property rights, including the right to own slaves. He also accused Lincoln of advocating for racial equality, which he believed was a dangerous and radical position.
In the final debate, Lincoln and Douglas clashed over the issue of citizenship for Black Americans. Lincoln argued that Black Americans were entitled to the same rights and protections as white citizens, while Douglas believed that citizenship should be determined by state law. Lincoln also criticized Douglas's position on popular sovereignty, arguing that it would only lead to more conflict and division over the issue of slavery. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's views on racial equality and accusing him of supporting the abolitionist movement.
Overall, the Lincoln-Douglas debates were a pivotal moment in American history, as they helped to shape the national debate over slavery and its extension into the western territories. The debates highlighted the stark differences between the two candidates on the issue of slavery and helped to galvanize public opinion on the issue. While Lincoln ultimately lost the Senate election to Douglas, the debates helped to establish him as a national figure and set the stage for his eventual election as President in 1860.
#SPJ1
the statement "the federal government should pass the equal rights amendment" could best be described as .
a. an argument or claim
b. supporting evidence
c. a waiting prompt
d. a biased source
Which is the consequence of the march? why?
The consequence of the March on Washington was the successful passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
What was the outcome of the March on Washington?The March on Washington was a pivotal moment in the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. More than 250,000 people including civil rights activists, leaders, and supporters gathered in Washington, D.C to advocate for racial equality and an end to segregation.
The march culminated in a historic speech by Martin Luther King Jr., known as the "I Have a Dream" speech which called for racial harmony and justice. The impact of the march was significant as it put pressure on the government and played a crucial role in the subsequent passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Read more about March on Washington
brainly.com/question/1621956
#SPJ1
Following the Missouri Compromise, which factor created political tensions between the North and the South? (PLEASE HELP)
A. The Supreme Court ruled that fugitive slave laws did not follow the Constitution.
B. Northern factory owners began using the labor of enslaved people to replace free workers. C. Congress refused to admit any new slave states to the union.
D. The federal government used tariffs to protect industries in the North.
Answer: The answer is Northern States failed to enforce federal fugitive slave laws.
Explanation: Have a good Day:)
True or False) At one point in time parts of what is today Saudi
Arabia was part of the Ottoman Empire?
True, at one point in time parts of what is today Saudi Arabia was part of the Ottoman Empire. This statement is True.Explanation:The Ottoman Empire, which was also known as the Turkish Empire, lasted from 1299 to 1923. It was founded in Anatolia, present-day Turkey, by Osman I.
It was initially a small Muslim state that expanded to become one of the most powerful empires in the world. They also expanded into the Arabian Peninsula, where they maintained a presence in parts of present-day Saudi Arabia until the early 20th century.The region that is today known as Saudi Arabia was divided into several smaller kingdoms and tribes before the arrival of the Ottomans.
The Ottomans began to expand into the region in the 16th century, establishing control over several areas. They maintained a presence in the region until the end of World War I, when they were defeated by Allied forces and their empire was dismantled.
To know more about Ottoman Empire visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/21258779
#SPJ11
select the correct answer. which religion was popular in india before the development of hinduism during the gupta reign?
a. buddhism
b. christianity
c. islam
d. daoism
Answer: a. Buddhism
Explanation: Not Islam
How was dolley Madison an important political figure in us history
A.she helped end war of 1812 by supporting of the treaty of Ghent
B. She is credited as the author of the Monroe doctrine
C.she helped form an alliance between the British and indigenous peoples
D.she established the national role people now call the First Lady
The success of gandhi's actions represents a turning point in indian history in that
The success of Gandhi's actions represents a turning point in Indian history in that it led to the widespread participation of Indian people in the Indian independence movement.What were the success of Gandhi's actions?Gandhi's nonviolent civil disobedience campaign proved to be highly successful in achieving India's independence from Britain.
Gandhi, known as Mahatma, inspired Indian people to join the struggle for independence through his peaceful means and adherence to truth and nonviolence.Gandhi's efforts began with the Champaran satyagraha in Bihar, India, in 1917, which successfully protested the exploitation of indigo farmers by British landlords.
The Kheda Satyagraha, Ahmedabad Mill Strike, and the Salt March are some of the other examples of the success of his actions.What did Gandhi do for Indian independence?He was the head of the Indian National Congress.
Under Gandhi's guidance, Congress was transformed into a mass movement that mobilized millions of ordinary Indians from various regions, castes, and classes in the struggle for freedom. Gandhi mobilized people through his nonviolent civil disobedience movement, boycotts, fasts, and marches. Gandhi's idea of nonviolent resistance influenced future freedom struggles across the world.
For more questions on: Indian independence movement.
https://brainly.com/question/12153093
#SPJ8
Between the two [The Laws of Burgos and the Spanish Requirement] which of them is the more repressive of the rights of the peoples living in the new world?
The Spanish Requirement is the more repressive of the rights of the peoples living in the new world between the two The Laws of Burgos and the Spanish Requirement. The Spanish Requirement is a document that was created by the Spanish Crown in 1513.
The purpose of this document was to provide a legal justification for Spain to conquer and subdue the indigenous peoples of the Americas, particularly in the Caribbean and Mexico. The Spanish Requirement also stated that if the indigenous peoples did not accept Spanish rule, they would be considered enemies of Spain and could be enslaved or killed.
This document was widely criticized by human rights groups and religious leaders at the time, as it was seen as a justification for the brutal treatment of indigenous peoples. The Laws of Burgos, on the other hand, were a set of laws that were created by the Spanish Crown in 1512.
To know more about Requirement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2929431
#SPJ11
3. (contextualization) identify one example of segregation that robinson and the wpc opposed.
Jackie Robinson and the Women's Political Caucus (WPC) opposed the segregation of public spaces. As an American athlete, Jackie Robinson is known for breaking the color barrier in professional baseball.
Robinson was the first African American player to play in the Major Leagues in 1947 after years of racial segregation in baseball. Robinson's achievement was much more than a sports record; it was a significant event in the history of the United States. Robinson's actions paved the way for African Americans to pursue equal opportunities in other fields and businesses. Segregation was the systematic separation of individuals by their race, ethnicity, or gender in public spaces. The WPC opposed segregation of public spaces. The Women's Political Caucus, founded in 1971, has long been an advocate for gender equality and women's rights. They believed that everyone should have the right to access public spaces regardless of their race, gender, or ethnicity. Therefore, they fought against any policies or laws that discriminated against individuals. Hence, Jackie Robinson and the Women's Political Caucus opposed the segregation of public spaces.
The Women's Political Caucus (WPC) is an organization that aims to advance the political and leadership roles of women in society. It focuses on promoting women's participation in politics, advocating for women's rights and issues, and supporting women candidates for political office.
To get more information about Women's Political Caucus (WPC) visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19207437
#SPJ11
Whom did journalists quickly accuse of destroying the USS Maine? a. Russia b. Cuba c. Spain d. Panama
Journalists quickly accused Spain of destroying the USS Maine. The correct answer is C.
USS Maine was the US Navy's second commissioned battleship and the first U.S. Navy ship to be called after the state of Maine. The ship's keel was laid on October 17, 1888, in Bath, Maine, and she was commissioned on September 17, 1895. On February 15, 1898, the Maine blew up in Havana Harbor, killing 266 people.
However, while the cause of the USS Maine's sinking remained uncertain, American journalists were quick to accuse Spain of destroying the battleship. The sinking of the USS Maine intensified pressure on the United States to declare war on Spain. Consequently, President McKinley declared war on Spain on April 25, 1898, following months of tension. Therefore, the correct option os C.
For more such answers on Spain
https://brainly.com/question/30576301
#SPJ8
The UN International Watercourse Convention (IWC) considers its cornerstone to mandate that states should utilize an international watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner, with a view to attain optimal sustainable utilization thereof. This language comes from which IWC Article?
Group of answer choices
Article 5
none of the above.
Article 12
Article 21
The correct option is Article 5. The language that says "states should utilize an international watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner, with a view to attain optimal sustainable utilization thereof" is contained in Article 5 of the UN International Watercourse Convention (IWC).
The United Nations International Watercourse Convention (IWC) is a treaty that is meant to promote the sustainable use of transboundary rivers, groundwater, and lakes.The treaty serves as a guideline for member states to ensure equitable and reasonable usage of international watercourses. The treaty's primary purpose is to guarantee that states using international watercourses do not endanger or damage the watercourses or other states that share them with them.The IWC stipulates that states must employ international watercourses in an equitable and reasonable manner, with a view to achieving optimal sustainable utilization thereof. The provisions of the Convention apply to all international watercourses, whether or not they are covered by other agreements or arrangements.
Article 5 of the UN International Watercourse Convention (IWC) specifies that states must utilize international watercourses in an equitable and reasonable manner, with a view to attaining optimal sustainable use of the watercourse. It is regarded as the cornerstone of the Convention because it establishes the fundamental principle of equitable and reasonable use for all states that share international watercourses.In addition, the article demands that states consider the interests of other states affected by the watercourse, which includes existing and future generations, and take all appropriate measures to protect the watercourse's ecosystem.
To know more about International Watercourse Convention visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/31666310
#SPJ11
What were some pros about us intervention in Nicaragua?
PLEASEEE HELP
Which diagram explains one reason that Japan attacked the United States at
Pearl Harbor?
OA.
OB.
O C.
O D.
The United States
threatened Japan's
ability to expand its
territories.
caused
American forces were caused
organizing for an
attack on Japan.
The Italian military caused
was nearing
defeat in Europe.
Japan had been
forced to fight on
two fronts.
caused
Japan attacked the
United States by surprise
to try to keep it from
participating in the war.
Japan attacked the
United States to
prevent it from
attacking.
Japan wanted to help
Italy win in Europe so
it could come to
Japan's aid in Asia.
It launched an attack
on the United States
to try to win decisively
on one front.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Since 1908, Pearl Harbor has been the main docking point for almost every warship within the US Navy, and it was within this harbor that the United States Pacific Fleet would come together to dock. It also served as a staging ground for naval campaigns. The Japanese knew if they wanted to continue their expansion into the South Pacific, they needed to remove the possibility of the USA interrupting them. So the Japanese launched a surprise attack, hoping it would cripple our Pacific Fleets. And though the attack proved successful, it was a colossal failure that cost Japan the war. They were successful in crippling our battleship groups and other support role ships, but they failed to destroy the most essential and deadly ships the US had, Its aircraft carriers. With these carriers, the US acquired Victories at the Battle of Midway Atoll, the Battle of Guadalcanal, the hunting and destruction of the Japanese super battleship Yamato, and many more.
what are the strengths and weaknesses of the secretary of the interior?
Any individual's performance in this post might vary depending on their leadership style, expertise, and specific activities made throughout their tenure.
Strength and weaknesses of secretary of interiorThe Department of the Interior is a vast and complex agency, and navigating bureaucratic processes and procedures can be difficult. Overcoming administrative barriers and efficiently implementing changes can be difficult.
Some of their strengths include Expertise and Knowledge, Policy Development and Stakeholders management the weaknesses on the other hand include bot not limited to Political Pressures, limited resources to work with and the bureaucratic processes.
Learn more on secretary of the interior here: https://brainly.com/question/20715427
#SPJ1
how did robert lundy escape derry
Answer:
to avoid unnecessary attention, lundy hid until nightfall, when he escaped in disguise, with the help of walker and murray
Explanation:
i hope this helps :]
can one nation or empire ake over another nation without oppressing others? has imperialism becomemore or less oppressive as the world has become more industrialized?
It is possible for one nation or empire to take over another nation without oppressing others. In fact, it is possible to take over a nation without any oppression at all. However, most instances of imperialism have involved some level of oppression. Imperialism, as a system, is based on the idea that one country has the right to control the affairs of another country.
This often involves imposing the values, beliefs, and customs of the dominant country on the people of the country being controlled. This can be done through force, coercion, or manipulation. For example, in the late 19th century, European countries colonized many parts of Africa. They did so with the intention of exploiting the natural resources of the continent. In doing so, they imposed their own language, culture, and religion on the people of Africa. This was a form of oppression, as it denied the people of Africa the ability to develop their own language, culture, and religion. However, there have been some instances of imperialism that were less oppressive. For example, the United States acquired the territory of Alaska from Russia in 1867.
The people of Alaska were not oppressed, but they were not given the right to vote in U.S. elections. This was because the U.S. government did not believe that the people of Alaska were ready for democracy. In general, however, imperialism has been oppressive. As the world has become more industrialized, imperialism has become less oppressive. This is because industrialization has led to the development of more efficient means of communication and transportation. This has made it easier for people in different parts of the world to communicate with each other and to travel. As a result, people have become more aware of the world around them. This has led to increased pressure on imperial powers to treat their subject peoples more fairly.
To know more about empire visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32497385
#SPJ11
As a result of the Seven Years' War, a number of French residents in Nova Scotia:
a) were forced to move to Louisiana, where their descendants came to be known as Cajuns.
b) rejected the outcome by petitioning the British government to establish Fort Necessity.
c) gained new land and farms as they won territorial disputes.
d) settled territory further to the North.
The Seven Years' War, a number of French residents in Nova Scotia were forced to move to Louisiana, where their descendants came to be known as Cajuns. The correct option is option A.
The result of the Seven Years' War made this move necessary because the British defeated the French in the war and gained control of North America. The war caused a lot of French immigrants in North America to be deported by the British as a result of the Treaty of Paris signed in 1763. The French residents of Acadia were forced to move to Louisiana and scattered across the world, and their descendants came to be known as Cajuns.Louisiana was chosen because it was the nearest French colony that would accept them. The migration of Acadians to Louisiana increased the Cajun population. They worked in the fields, fished, and harvested seafood while also preserving their culture.
Learn more about French residents here:
https://brainly.com/question/30559574
#SPJ11
a reason for the german decision to accept an armistice in world war one could be best described as a result of:
The reason for the German decision to accept an armistice in World War One can be best described as a result of the military and economic pressures that Germany faced. World War One, also known as the First World War, was a global war that lasted from 28 July 1914 to 11 November 1918. The war involved the majority of the world's countries, including all the great powers of the time.
It was the deadliest conflict in history, resulting in an estimated 8.5 million to 15 million military and civilian deaths. The German decision to accept an armistice can be best described as a result of the military and economic pressures that Germany faced. Germany's military position had become increasingly weak in 1918. The German army was exhausted and demoralized by the losses and hardships of four years of warfare. The arrival of American troops in significant numbers had tipped the balance of power decisively against Germany. Furthermore, the blockade of Germany's ports by the British Navy had led to severe food and fuel shortages and a breakdown of the civilian economy, which made it difficult for Germany to continue the war.
The German leadership realized that continuing the war would only lead to further suffering and destruction for the German people. Therefore, they accepted the armistice that was offered by the Allies on November 11, 1918, ending the war.What was an armistice?An armistice is an agreement between warring parties to suspend hostilities temporarily, usually to negotiate a peace treaty or to allow for an exchange of prisoners or wounded soldiers. In the case of World War One, the armistice was the agreement that ended the fighting between Germany and the Allied powers, leading to the eventual signing of the Treaty of Versailles, which officially ended the war.
To know more about armistice visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30521468
#SPJ11
2. Now explain why in your opinion, this one thing/event is the most important
thing that you learned about throughout the unit. Think about how that
thing/event impacts your life and the lives of others now. You could also also
think about how the thing/event relates to how Canada relates to other countries
and/or people who live in other country?
At least in THREE ways, clearly explain and justify why Economic Growth And
Working Life /events are the most important thing.
The most significant topics I have learnt about throughout this lesson are economic growth and working life. Here are three explanations:
1. The welfare of people, communities, and nations depends on economic prosperity. An expanding economy boosts wages, expands employment possibilities, and raises living standards. Economic growth generates innovation, advances human development, and supports societal progress, therefore its advantages go beyond financial rewards.
2. Since we all spend a considerable amount of our lives working, the working world has an impact on us all. A satisfying working life offers more than simply a means of support; it also gives people a feeling of accomplishment, identity, and purpose. The open and varied workplace culture in Canada has fostered equality, respect, and diversity, making it a desirable location for top talent from across the world.
3. As Canada is connected to the rest of the globe via economic growth and the working world, these factors have global effects. The expansion of new markets and greater investment made possible by Canada's involvement in international trade have benefited the country's economy and created job possibilities.
Learn more about Economic Growth here:
https://brainly.com/question/29621837
#SPJ1
How did the English bill of rights limit the power of monarch?
Answer:
Explanation:
Enacted in 1689, the English Bill of Rights limited the power of the monarch by affirming parliamentary sovereignty, a principle defining the power of the parliament, and declaring only the parliament was allowed to change or make laws, not the king alone. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights prohibited cruel and unusual punishment, meaning the king was banned from exacting harsh penalties on individuals accused of crimes. It also provided the freedom to bear arms for self-defense, freedom of speech in parliament, freedom to petition the king, and freedom from royal interference in law.
how many times in history has an individual not gained the popular vote and still become president?
Answer:
As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, there have been five instances in United States history where a candidate won the presidency without winning the popular vote. These instances are as follows:
1. John Quincy Adams (1824): He lost the popular vote to Andrew Jackson but was elected president by the House of Representatives.
2. Rutherford B. Hayes (1876): He lost the popular vote to Samuel J. Tilden but won the presidency through an electoral college decision.
3. Benjamin Harrison (1888): He lost the popular vote to Grover Cleveland but won the electoral college and became president.
4. George W. Bush (2000): He lost the popular vote to Al Gore but won the presidency after a controversial decision by the Supreme Court regarding the recount in Florida.
5. Donald Trump (2016): He lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton but won the presidency through an electoral college victory.
Please note that the information provided is accurate as of September 2021, and there may be changes or updates since then. It's always good to refer to the latest information for the most accurate and up-to-date details.
Answer: 5 times
Explanation:
who was the most significant mainstream star of the 1950s and 1960s? group of answer choices bob wills ernest tubb milton brown hank williams
The most significant mainstream star of the 1950s and 1960s was Hank Williams Sr. He was an American singer-songwriter who was regarded as one of the most important figures in the history of country music.
Williams recorded songs in a variety of genres, including honky-tonk, country blues, and western swing, during his brief but meteoric career. His songs, such as "I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry" and "Your Cheatin' Heart," are considered classics of the country music genre.
Williams had a major influence on subsequent country musicians and is credited with popularizing honky-tonk music. He died at the age of 29, and his legacy continues to influence country music to this day.
To know more about mainstream visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/10419485
#SPJ11
