Mass production reduced wealth disparity and turned public opinion pro-business: Roaring '20s mark the end of the Progressive Era. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The Progressive era and the 1920s, commonly referred to as the "roaring twenties" and "the new era," had one thing in common: America continued to experience economic development and prosperity. Working-class Americans' salaries rose in tandem with those of middle-class and wealthy Americans.
The Progressive movement started to be replaced by a number of other groups in the 1920s. Progressive victories in some circumstances, like women's suffrage, made campaigners less motivated to press for more change. Overview In the United States, the early 20th century saw economic growth and progressive change.
Learn more about Progressive Era here:
https://brainly.com/question/17162211
#SPJ1
Use the primary source on Jefferson Davis's First Inaugural Address to answer the question.
Regarding the new Constitution of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis said: "It makes clear their well-known
intent. It is free of the regional conflicts that interfered with our rights."
What did he mean by this?
O The framers of the Constitution intended that states could secede if their rights were restricted.
The Founding Fathers intended that citizens had the right to own property, including enslaved
people.
O Federal laws should only be followed if they do not conflict with existing state laws.
O Westward expansion should include territory where enslavement is allowed
Jefferson Davis meant that the new Constitution of the Confederacy was free of regional conflicts that interfered with their rights.
This suggests that the Confederacy believed that their rights were being infringed upon by the federal government, particularly in regards to slavery, and that the new Constitution was designed to protect those rights. It implies that the Confederacy believed that regional conflicts had prevented the proper recognition of their rights in the previous Constitution.
Jefferson Davis meant that the new Constitution of the Confederacy was free from conflicts between different regions that had previously interfered with their rights. In other words, the new Constitution was intended to unify the Southern states and establish clear guidelines for their secession from the United States. Davis believed that the regional conflicts that had existed in the past, particularly over the issue of slavery, had caused friction between states and impeded the Confederacy's ability to protect its interests. By creating a new Constitution that was free of these conflicts, Davis hoped to establish a more cohesive and united Confederate government.
To know more about Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
PLS HURRY TIMED!!! Hume felt that causal claims were the most valid.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
he does not believe in cause and effect and was skeptical of
Which of the following is NOT a cause of the Russian Revolution of 1917? A.Joseph Stalin's brutal oppression of ethnic minorities. B Russia's terrible performance on the battlefields of WW1 against the Germans. C. The influence of Rasputin on the royal family of Russia . D.The highly unpopular Tsar Nicolas the 2nd of Russia.
Answer:
A. Joseph Stalin's brutal oppression of ethnic minorities.
Explanation:
Joseph Stalin did not rise to power (as the General Secretary) until 1922, and did not become dictator until 1924. Therefore, A) is not the answer, as he was not the leader during the oppression, but rather Vladimir Lenin.
~
Learn more about the Russian Revolution, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9625628
Use this passage to answer the following question:
The Cotton Gin
Andrea Brecheen
The cotton gin was one of the most amazing and tragic inventions of early America. The cotton gin is credited to the brilliant and creative American inventor Eli Whitney. Because Whitney's invention made cotton harvesting easier, it allowed farmers in the South to increase production. The cotton gin simplified the process of removing the cotton from the seeds, a process formerly done by hand.
As a result, Southern plantations increased their production of cotton from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales just 20 years later. Because of the increase in production, the farmers in South became even more dependent on cotton for revenue. This new reliance on cotton increased the need for slavery. More slaves were needed to farm the ever expanding cotton plantations. If Whitney had known the effects his invention would have on slavery, he never would have created it.
Which of the following would best support the author's claim that more slaves were needed after the invention of the cotton gin?
Examples of other inventions that affected slaves' lives
Information related to the life and times of Eli Whitney
Stories of the first time people saw the cotton gin working in the field
Details about the number of slaves working cotton 20 years after the cotton gin
Details about the number of slaves working cotton 20 years after the cotton gin would best support the author's claim that more slaves were needed after the invention of the cotton gin . Option D is correct .
Who is Whitney?The cotton gin's most well-known inventor was Eli Whitney, but he was also known as the father of the mass production method. He figured out how to machine-make muskets in 1798 so that the parts could be swapped out.
Although the invention of the cotton gin made it easier to remove seeds, it did not eliminate the need for slave labor to grow cotton and pick it. Actually, the opposite took place. Enslaved people demanded a lot more land and enslaved labor because cotton farming was so lucrative for them.
Whitney never would have invented it if he had known how his invention would affect slavery.
To learn more about cotton gin visit :
https://brainly.com/question/9738066
#SPJ1
Please help me 50 points
Answer:
1• Virginia and Tennessee
2•The South's
3• California and Colorado
4•*i don't have a answer to this*
5• Northern States
Based on the historical perspective and the available option, the part of the country where most of the Civil War battles fought in Virginia and Tennessee.
What is the American Civil War?American Civil was a civil war in the United States which was fought between the Union[f] ("the North") and the Confederacy ("the South").
Generally, the cause of the war can be linked to when the Confederacy formed separate states that had seceded which came as a result of a dispute over whether slavery would be permitted to expand into the western territories, leading to more slave states, or not.
In this case, we have the following:the part of the country where most of the Civil War battles were fought in Virginia and Tennessee.the part of the country that felt was defending its land was The South.the part of the country that did not have a lot of damage was California and Colorado. When battles were fought nearby, the land was destroyed and crops got damaged. People were also killed and deserted their homeland.The part that recovered faster from the war was the Northern states because they had lower casualties, and are technologically advanced, with political and administrative seat-based in the region.Hence, in this case, it is concluded that American Civil War left lasting memories and experiences in the history of America.
Learn more about American Civil War here: https://brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ1
KEY OUEsTION: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT,OF PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC IDEAS OF RACE ON THE JEWISH NATION BY THE NAZI GERMANY DURING THE PERIOD 1933 TO 1946?
Between 1933 and 1945, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party ruled Germany, turning it into a dictatorship. This period of time is known as Nazi Germany. Germany under Hitler swiftly developed into a totalitarian nation where the government had control over almost every area of daily life.
The advent of fascism in Europe, the defeat of Germany in World War One, and the German racialist (völkisch) movement in the nineteenth century all contributed to the development of the political philosophy known as nazism.
Learn more about Nazi Germany here:
https://brainly.com/question/10076234
#SPJ1
how important is it to consider the irony of colonialism and empeire
Answer:
It is crucial to consider the irony of colonialism and empire because it highlights the inherent contradictions and injustices of these systems. Colonialism and empire were built on the idea of Western superiority and the exploitation of other cultures and peoples, often through violence and oppression. However, this idea of superiority was not only unfounded, but it also ignored the rich history, knowledge, and diversity of the colonized peoples.
Moreover, the irony of colonialism and empire is that they claimed to bring civilization, progress, and modernity to the "uncivilized" and "backward" peoples, while in reality, they disrupted and destroyed indigenous cultures, economies, and social systems. Colonizers often erased or suppressed local languages, religions, and customs and imposed their own values, norms, and institutions.
By recognizing the irony of colonialism and empire, we can challenge the dominant narratives and perspectives that have justified and glorified these systems and instead, acknowledge the complex and diverse experiences of those who were colonized and oppressed. We can also work towards a more equitable and just society that values diversity, multiculturalism, and respect for all peoples and cultures.
Explanation:
By 2045, The USA will be even more diverse. Whites will no longer be in the majority.
How do you think that might affect our country?
Answer:
The projected increase in diversity in the United States by 2045 is likely to have both positive and negative effects on the country.
On the positive side, greater diversity can lead to increased cultural understanding and appreciation, as well as more opportunities for cross-cultural collaboration and innovation. It can also help to reduce prejudice and discrimination, as people are exposed to more diverse perspectives and experiences. Additionally, the presence of more diverse voices in government, business, and other areas of society can help to create more equitable policies and practices.
On the negative side, there may be increased tension and conflict as different cultural and ethnic groups struggle to assert their identity and maintain their cultural heritage. It could also lead to more political polarization, as different groups compete for power and resources. Moreover, demographic shifts can lead to economic and social changes, such as the need for more resources and services to support an aging population or changing job market demands.
Overall, it will be important for the United States to find ways to promote understanding and cooperation among different groups, while also ensuring that everyone has access to the resources and opportunities they need to succeed. It will require continued efforts to address systemic inequality and promote inclusivity, as well as a willingness to embrace and celebrate the rich diversity that makes the United States a unique and vibrant society.
Question 1 of 10
Which statement best describes the circumstances surrounding the Voting
Rights Act of 1965 extension?
OA. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act and refused to
sign the extension, causing the law to lapse.
OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed
the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.
C. President Reagan was a strong supporter of the Voting Rights Act
and worked with the NAACP to sign the extension into law.
D. President Reagan repealed the Voting Rights Act and cut off
funding to agencies that were supposed to enforce it.
Answer:
The correct answer is OB. President Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, but he signed the extension after public pressure from the NAACP.
President Reagan initially opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 extension, but he signed it into law after public pressure from the NAACP. The NAACP argued that the law was still necessary to protect the voting rights of African Americans. Reagan signed the extension, but he also called for reforms to the law.
5. What actions in the 1950s led to Texas becoming a two-party state? (1 point)
O Republicans became more liberal.
O The Democratic party became more liberal.
O Many conservative Democrats joined the Republican party.
O Most liberal Republicans joined the Democratic party.
Many conservative Democrats joined the Republican party such actions in the 1950s led to Texas becoming a two-party state. The correct option is C.
The Republican Party, which was viewed as being more conservative on topics like civil rights and states' rights, began to gain support from many conservative Democrats in Texas in the 1950s. This signaled the start of Texas' transformation into a competitive two-party state from a largely Democratic one-party state.
The Democratic-Republicans were made up of many factions that placed an emphasis on state and local rights, agrarian interests, local and humanitarian issues, and democratic processes.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about Democratic here:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ1
could someone help me paraphrase this
Today, I would like to talk about the Second Amendment and the different opinions that people hold about it. As we all know, the Second Amendment is one of the most controversial issues in our country. Some people believe that it is their constitutional right to bear arms, while others believe that it should be heavily regulated or even repealed altogether.
Regardless of our personal beliefs on this issue, I think we can all agree that we need to find a way to address the concerns of both sides. It is important that we find a solution that works for everyone, and that we do so in a way that respects the Constitution and the rights of all Americans.
One way that we can start to address this issue is by having an open and honest dialogue about it. We need to listen to each other's perspectives and concerns, and work together to find common ground. This may involve some compromise on both sides, but I believe that we can find a solution that works for everyone.
Another way that we can address this issue is by focusing on gun safety and education. We need to ensure that people who own guns know how to use them safely and responsibly. We also need to make sure that guns are not falling into the wrong hands, such as criminals or those with mental health issues.
Finally, we need to look at our laws and regulations around firearms. We need to make sure that they are effective at keeping our communities safe, while also respecting the rights of gun owners. This may involve strengthening our background check system, closing loopholes in our laws, and ensuring that law enforcement has the resources they need to enforce these laws.
Answer:
The Second Amendment is a controversial issue in our country, with some believing it is their constitutional right to bear arms, while others believe it should be heavily regulated or repealed. To address this issue, we need to have an open and honest dialogue, focus on gun safety and education, and strengthen our laws and regulations around firearms. This may involve strengthening our background check system, closing loopholes in our laws, and ensuring law enforcement has the resources to enforce these laws.
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes how the Supreme Court decides cases?
Answer:
The Supreme Court decides cases through a process involving multiple steps and considerations. The best description of how the Supreme Court decides cases is as follows:
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and its primary role is to interpret the Constitution and ensure the law is applied correctly. When deciding cases, the Supreme Court follows a set of procedures and considerations, which include:
Granting Certiorari: The Supreme Court selects cases it will hear by granting certiorari, which is a formal request for a lower court to send the records of a case to the Supreme Court for review.
Oral Arguments: Once a case is accepted, the parties involved present their arguments before the Supreme Court justices during oral arguments. This allows the justices to ask questions and engage in a dialogue to gain a deeper understanding of the legal issues at hand.
Examination of Briefs and Records: Prior to oral arguments, the Supreme Court justices review briefs submitted by the parties, which summarize their legal arguments and relevant case law. They also examine the lower court records to understand the factual background of the case.
Deliberation and Opinion Writing: After oral arguments, the justices deliberate among themselves to discuss the case and exchange views. They then proceed to write opinions, which explain the reasoning behind their decision. These opinions can take the form of majority opinions, concurring opinions, or dissenting opinions.
Decision Making: The Supreme Court's decision is reached through a majority vote among the justices. The decision sets a precedent and becomes the law of the land, guiding future legal interpretations.
It's important to note that the Supreme Court's decision-making process can be influenced by various factors, such as legal precedents, constitutional principles, public policy considerations, and individual justices' legal philosophies. The Court aims to ensure fairness, uphold the rule of law, and make decisions that align with the Constitution and the best interpretation of the law.
Laissez-faire economics and antitrust acts were:
© A. unlikely to be supported by the same person.
B. hallmarks of the Populist Party platform.
O c. vocally supported by the robber barons.
• D. designed to rein in businesses that grew too large.
Option (d), Antitrust laws and laissez-faire economics were created to control out-of-control corporate growth.
What effects on the economy did laissez-faire have?Businesses operate with more flexibility under a free-market economy because there are fewer government prohibitions that would complicate doing business. In this environment, businesses are more inclined to take risks and make economic investments.
Antitrust laws are intended to control what.Antitrust laws are the regulations that regulate the market and how it operates. The objectives of these laws are to prevent monopolies and to reduce unfair commercial practices. Although the antitrust laws have been around for more than a century, their primary objective has remained the same: to protect the market's competitive environment for the benefit of consumers by making sure that businesses have strong incentives to operate profitably, keep costs down, and uphold high standards of quality.
Learn more about Antitrust laws: https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ1
What was the causes, course and consequences of the population boom in the sun belt states
Answer:
The population boom in the Sun Belt states, which include states such as Florida, Texas, Arizona, and California, was driven by a variety of factors. Some of the primary causes of the population boom include:
Climate: The Sun Belt states have a warm and sunny climate, which attracts retirees, vacationers, and individuals seeking a better quality of life.
Employment Opportunities: The Sun Belt states have been experiencing significant economic growth, which has created job opportunities and attracted workers from other regions.
Affordable Housing: The Sun Belt states have lower housing costs compared to other regions, which has made them attractive to people seeking more affordable homes.
Migration: The Sun Belt states have been receiving significant migration from other regions in the US and from other countries, which has contributed to their population growth.
Explanation:
The course of the population boom in the Sun Belt states has been marked by significant demographic changes. The population of these states has become more diverse, with significant increases in Hispanic and Asian populations. Additionally, the growth has led to the development of new cities and urban areas, which has transformed the landscape of the region.
The consequences of the population boom in the Sun Belt states have been both positive and negative. On the positive side, the growth has stimulated economic development and job creation, providing opportunities for residents. Additionally, the growth has contributed to the cultural diversity of the region, creating a vibrant and dynamic environment.
Complete answers!
Thanks
The reasons for the rise of imperialism are as follows.
Commercial Revolution: Production significantly increased as a result of the industrial revolution in European nations. National security: .In terms of nationalism.. Power dynamics:. Discovery of new routes: .Population expansion:. Anarchy in the State:
Imperialism is the practice, ideology, or attitude of extending or preserving power, especially through expansionism, using both hard force (economic and military strength) and soft power (cultural and diplomatic power), establishing or maintaining a . National security hegemony, and creating or maintaining a more or less formal empire.
One prominent, frequently synonymous, but distinct form of imperialism has been colonialism, which concentrates imperialism on the more or less formal distinction between metropolitan and colonial life, people, and lands
Learn more about imperialism, from :
brainly.com/question/1225474
#SPJ1
jose montero y VIdal and Dr. Trinidad Hermenigildo Pardo de Tavera? why do you think they have this opposing and conflicting perspectives? Who do you think is more reliable? why? defend your answer
Trinidad Pardo de Tavera was a Filipino academic and researcher, and Jose Montero Vidal was still a Spanish writer and documentary maker. there are difference between them.
What is the distinction between them?As can be seen, Vidal mentioned the incident in support of Spain, whereas Tavera mentioned it in support of the Philippines.
Vidal believes that the purpose of the mutiny was to dethrone Spanish government rule in the Philippines, whereas Tavera believes that it was motivated by the loss of privileges for Filipino workers and other members.
Vidal supported Governor Gen. Rafael Izquierdo's vision, while Tavera accused him of "privilege abolition."
To know about government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
1. Contrast Abraham Lincoln's arguments about secession to those of Southern leaders following the
election of 1860. Your response should identify at least two arguments made by Lincoln and directly
compare those with two arguments made by Southern leaders. (4 points)
Answer:
He gave several reasons, among them his belief that secession was unlawful, the fact that states were physically unable to separate, his fears that secession would cause the weakened government to descend into anarchy, and his steadfast conviction that all Americans should be friends towards one another, rather than enemies.
Explanation:
I don't even know if
this is right.
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(06.04 LC)
Which of the following is an example of a Buddhist shrine?
O Pyramid
O Longhouse
O Stupa
Ziggurat
4
Question 5 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(06.011 C
Fill in the blanks to explain what
some Native people have done at Mount Rushmore since 1970.
Since 1970, Native American activists have disapproved the presence of Mount Rushmore, which was built onto land from water that is thought-out protected by the Lakota Sioux family.
What is the significance?Every year, on July 4th, a group of Native American activists gather at Mount Rushmore to hold watch and protest against the memorial.
They view the monument as a letter of colonialism and misery and call for the return of the Black Hills to the Lakota Sioux family. In recent age, skilled have also existed calls to remove the memorial altogether and return the land to the Lakota Sioux.
Read more about colonialism here:
https://brainly.com/question/30236272
#SPJ1
This question concerns the pretrial process and procedures related to bail, and recent bail reform efforts and might require some additional outside research. While there is no Constitutional right to bail, the 8th Amendment explains that "excessive bail shall not be required." In an effort to reduce the number of defendants detained in jail prior to trial, some states have implemented minor changes to bail, while states such as California, New York, and New Jersey have made major changes and eliminated money bail for all crimes, though typically requiring violent felonies to still undergo normal bail proceedings. Should more states follow California, New York, and New Jersey and make similar major reforms to bail for non-violent felonies and lesser offenses, or are minor reforms, or no reforms at all the better course of action. Be prepared to defend your answer and research the issue to acquire more information if necessary.
The choice of whether to enact substantial, modest, or no reforms at all in the bail system is a difficult one that necessitates careful evaluation of a number of variables, including public safety, individual rights, and financial expenses.
What is bail reform?The term "bail reform" refers to initiatives taken to remedy issues with the criminal justice system's current bail system. Bail is the sum of money a defendant must pay in order to be freed from custody before a trial. Bail reform proponents contend that the present bail system unfairly punishes low-income defendants who are unable to pay bond and are consequently held until trial, frequently for protracted periods of time.
On the one hand, proponents of significant bail reform contend that the current system unfairly punishes low-income defendants who are unable to pay bond and are consequently imprisoned pretrial, frequently for long periods of time. Many adverse effects, such as losing one's job, home, or familial ties, may result from this. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that, regardless of guilt or innocence, pretrial imprisonment is linked to increased percentages of guilty pleas and lengthier sentences.
Many bail reform backers also contend that substitutes for cash bail, like pretrial programs, risk assessment instruments, and community supervision, can be more successful in ensuring that defendants appear in court while also minimizing needless pretrial detention.
Taxpayers are also burdened by the enormous cost of pretrial confinement; estimates indicate that it costs more than $14 billion yearly to hold criminals before trials.
On the other hand, opponents of significant bail reform contend that completely abolishing money bail can put the public at risk since it removes a crucial tool for ensuring criminals show up in court and deterring escape. People of color, individuals with mental health or substance addiction disorders, and other groups may be unfairly discriminated against, according to some, and risk assessment methods and community monitoring may be untrustworthy and unreliable.
In the end, to find the best strategy, more analysis of current policies and study may be required.
To know more about bail reform, visit:
brainly.com/question/30054626
#SPJ1
Which statement can best be supported by the information shown on this map?
The statement that can best be supported by the information on the map is: "The Ottoman Empire included parts of northern Africa."(Option A)
What was the Ottoman Empire about?The Ottoman Empire was one of the most powerful and long-lasting dynasties in history. For more nearly 600 years, this Islamic-run powerhouse dominated significant regions of the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and North Africa.
Between the 14th and early 20th centuries, the Ottoman Empire, also known as the Turkish Empire, ruled over much of Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and Northern Africa.
Learn more about the Ottoman Empire:
https://brainly.com/question/17850038
#SPJ1
Describe Hitler’s message in this excerpt:
The excerpt is from a speech by Adolf Hitler, in which he is conveying his message about the goals and aspirations of the Nazi party.
What informs the message?The main idea expressed in this passage is that the German people should prepare for war and try to regain the military power lost by the Treaty of Versailles.
Hitler's message is aggressive and advocates a militaristic approach to achieving Germany's goals. He is ready to use violence to achieve his goals and will not tolerate anyone who opposes him.
learn more about Adolf Hitler: https://brainly.com/question/354087
#SPJ1
Why were the Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful?
a. They harmed local businesses' revenue.
b. They appealed to the business owners' morality.
c. They won the support of the President.
d. They appealed to religious feelings.
Answer: A. They harmed local businesses' revenue.
Please help me solve this question for my Humanites class upon a selected artwork choose.
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes.
Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miro had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction.
Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Question:
Social, Historical, and/or Cultural Origin
Briefly describe the Cultural Origins and/or the Social and Historical relevance of your selected artwork
Website:
https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.69660.html
Answer:
The Farm, painted by Joan Miró in 1921, has cultural origins that are deeply rooted in the artist's personal history and the region of Catalonia, where he spent his summers. Miró was deeply attached to his native Catalonia and its culture, and this is reflected in the painting. The Farm can be seen as a representation of the rural Catalan landscape and its traditional way of life, which was under threat at the time due to rapid industrialization and modernization.
At the same time, Miró had moved to Paris in 1920 to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital, which was also a period of cultural and artistic ferment in Europe. The painting reflects the influence of the cubist movement in its formal vocabulary, but also shows a tendency towards abstraction and simplification of forms. This blending of traditional rural Catalan culture with avant-garde European artistic movements is a hallmark of Miró's work.
Overall, The Farm represents a complex fusion of personal, cultural, and artistic influences that reflects the historical and social context of early 20th century Europe. It can be seen as a statement on the changing nature of Catalan society and the tension between tradition and modernity, as well as a reflection of the broader artistic and cultural movements of the time.
why did the german managed to colonize Tanganyika strong resistance from the people
Answer:
the uprising lasted for two years and involve people over 10,000 square miles
Explanation:
the maji maji uprising in Tanganyika was the most significant African challenge to German colonia rule during the brief period when german has Africa colonies
6.06 war on the bank
Based on Andrew Jackson's perspective, he would have opposed establishment of a national bank and so, opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
What was the Andrew Jackson's perspective on the cases?The McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to define the scope of the legislative power that Congress had and how it related to legislatures power. He would opposed establishment of national bank and hence would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision.
Gibbons v. Ogden was case where Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce should be granted to the Congress. President Jackson would have opposed the ruling which said expanded Congress's power to cover interstate commerce.
Read more about McCulloch v. Maryland
brainly.com/question/729429
#SPJ1
.. Explain the importance of the Black Church, the Freedmen's Bureau, and the federal government to
Black Americans during Reconstruction. Your response should identify at least four ways in which
these institutions supported Black people and Black communities during Reconstruction. (4 points)
After the Civil War, the Thirteenth Amendment freed all slaves in the United States, regardless of where they were, and the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 freed African Americans in rebel states.
As a result, the majority of black people in the South now faced the same challenge that black people in the North had to deal with: being a free people in a hostile environment. Houston Hartsfield Holloway, a writer who was a freedman, stated: "For we colored people did not know how to be free and the white people did not know how to have a free colored person about them."
The country was still unprepared to cope with the issue of full citizenship for its newly liberated black population even after the Emancipation Proclamation, two additional years of war, service by African American troops, and the collapse of the Confederacy.
Learn more about Reconstruction here:
https://brainly.com/question/16792041
#SPJ1
pls help me with history i’ll give u brainlist
Since Sputnik was an artificial satellite (the world's first), it had no direct effect on athletics. It definitely did not foster cooperation between the US and USSR, but actually led to a competitive space race to prove each country's superiority over the other. There was no need to send nuclear missiles into space, so C. is just wrong. The correct answer is D. it prompted a space race between the U.S. and U.S.S.R.
Please help me answer this question for my Humanites class it is based on a selected artwork I choose “The Farm by Joan Miro”
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes. Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miró had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction. Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Question:
How is the selection classified in the Humanities? Is it Literature, Visual Art, Music, Theater, Musical Stage, or other?
Answer:
Short and simple response: The selection is classified in the field of Visual Art, specifically in the area of painting.
Longer response: The selection is classified as Visual Art. It discusses the life and work of the artist Joan Miró, particularly his painting titled "The Farm," which represents a synthesis of realism and cubism. The article also mentions Miró's shift towards surrealist automatism and abstraction in the mid-1920s. The focus on Miró's artistic style and technique, as well as his biography, makes this selection a piece of writing in the field of Visual Art.
This passage, written by economist David A.
Wells in 1889, describes changes to work during the Industrial Age. The modern manufacturing system has been brought into a condition [similar] to that of a military organization, in which the individual no longer works as independently as formerly, but as a private in the ranks, obeying orders, keeping step, as it were, to the tap of the drum, and having nothing to say as to the plan of his work, of its final completion, or of its ultimate use and distribution. In short, the people who work in the modern factory are, as a rule, taught to do one thing -to perform one and generally a simple operation; and when there is no more of that kind of work to do, they are in a measure helpless. The result has been... [the destruction of] the pride which the workman formerly took in his work... What is one result of the changes described in this passage?
Workers were paid more as their values to companies increased.
Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.
Workers became more loyal to companies who rewarded their creativity.
Workers were celebrated for their individual skills, and the need for labor unions declined.
Based on the passage, the result of the changes described is that workers became more interchangeable and were taught to perform only one simple operation. This led to the destruction of the pride that the workman formerly took in his work. Therefore, the correct answer is: Workers became interchangeable, and they were fired when injured or unable to work.
