Answer this question plss!! Thanks :)

Answer:

Explanation: There were several factors that contributed to the decline of the Old Kingdom, but the most important issue was the erosion of the authority of the Pharaoh and the accompanying growing power of the nobility and priesthood. This led to the decentralization of power in Egypt and constant power struggles and civil war.

Answer: $940

Explanation:

The depreciation expense per year going by the Straight-line depreciation method is calculated by the formula:

= (Cost - Salvage value) / Useful life of asset

= (5,500 - 800) / 5

= $940 per year

$940 will be removed from the value of the asset every year until the 5th year where it will be worth its salvage value of $800.

Answer:

Explanation:

c

Answer:

baby-boomer

Explanation:

Answer:B

Explanation:

The correct option is B. US imperialism caused the Vietnam War. In the 1960s, French antiwar activists joined forces with Americans opposed to their government's aggression in response to Vietnamese opposition to American imperialism.

Since Vietnam was split into a communist North and a democratic South in 1954, the United States has sent money, weapons, and training to the government and military of South Vietnam. When the two sides' tensions reached a point of armed conflict in 1961, U.S. President John F.

With American political and financial help, South Vietnam was maintained as a purportedly democratic republic between 1954 to 1963. In actuality, its governance was hardly democratic. Ngo Dinh Diem, the leader of South Vietnam, asserted that his administration was a democratic one.

Learn more about The Vietnam War here:

https://brainly.com/question/11375126

#SPJ5

Answer:

I don't know if this is genuine curiosity but I'll try to provide a full explanation for all questions

22+22=44

The confederacy is viewed as racist by many because it was created as a pro-slavery group. Through being pro-slavery they were being oppresive to African American/POC and viewed these slaves as a lesser form of a human when in reality, they were still people. Those who still celebrate the confederacy and state that the confederacy is the "ideal America" are either being ignorant to what the confederacy stood for or are unknown to the atrocities that the confederacy committed. The confederacy also only existed for 4 years while America has existed for 244 years.

The statement "all lives matter" doesn't neccesarily mean anything wrong. Because it's true, all lives do matter and need to be respected and treated with equal respect. However, the all lives matter movement was created after the black lives matter movement was created. In essence, it was made to silence those who were speaking out about the unfair treatment to Black people through the police force. Because of this the all lives matter movement is frowned upon because instead of speaking up about problems that are specific to people of other races it was made to silence black people specifically.

If you are serious, continue to ask questions and form your own decisions! This is obviously my side of view as it is still considered controversial but I hope it helps :)

Explanation:

Given lines

L1

( 1 - a) x - y = 1 ......i)

L2

6x + ay = 9 ....ii)

Slope of line I) Is

m1 = - ( x-coefficient) / ( y-coefficient)

= - ( 1 - a) / - 1

= 1 - a

Slope of line II) is

m2 = - (x-coefficient) / ( y-coefficient)

= - 6 / a

Now by the question

In 1st case

L1 and L2 are parallel so

m1 = m2

( 1 - a) = - 6 / a

a - a² = - 6

a² - a - 6 = 0

a² - ( 3 - 2 ) a - 6 = 0

a² - 3a + 2a - 6 =0

a ( a - 3 ) + 2 ( a - 3 ) = 0

(a - 3 ) ( a + 2) = 0

Either

a = 3 or a = - 2

Now in second case

L1 and L2 are perpendicular so

m1 * m2 = - 1

1 - a * - 6/ a = - 1

- 6 + 6a = - a

6a + a = 6

7a = 6

a = 6 / 7

The value of a are 3 , -2 and 6/7

Hope it will help :)❤

Expansionism and centralisation have existed throughout recorded history by states, with the earliest examples dating back to the mid- third millennium BC. However, the concept of imperialism arose in the modern age, associated chiefly with the European colonial powers of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries and New Imperialism.

Answer:

Starting in April 1992, Serbia set out to “ethnically cleanse” Bosnian territory by systematically removing all Bosnian Muslims, known as Bosniaks. Serbia, together with ethnic Bosnian Serbs, attacked Bosniaks with former Yugoslavian military equipment and surrounded Sarajevo, the capital city.

Explanation:

Answer:

Segregation

EXPLANATION: RACIAL SEGERATION!

I think so

Answer:

its b!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Explanation:

Answer: B or railroad crossings.

Explanation:

Answer:

it stirred support for women's rights

Answer:

Belief in God the Father, Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and the Holy Spirit. The death, descent into hell, resurrection and ascension of Christ. The holiness of the Church and the communion of saints. Christ's second coming, the Day of Judgement and salvation of the faithful.

Explanation:

Answer:

If the Nile River did not flood annually in Egypt Civilization there wouldn't have been any cilivilization exist that we know of.

The answer is: A. The civilization would have died out due to lack of food and water.

Answer:

B. The Bible

Explanation:

..Bible.....

Answer:

You might report this answer but you did name anything so i cant answer your question. sorry

Explanation:

Answer: They commanded the army, convened and presided over the Senate and the popular assemblies and executed their decrees, and represented the state in foreign affairs. In times of crisis they were allowed to appoint a dictator with absolute power. interpret the laws in place of the judges. make new laws instead of the legislature. take over command of the army and navy. As part of their executive functions, the consuls were responsible for carrying into effect the decrees of the Senate and the laws of the assemblies. The consuls were the chairmen of the Senate, which served as a board of advisers.

I sincerely hope this helps :)

Answer:

Explanation:

in the 2000 presidential election. Thus, Clinton's partisan legacy remains complex and uncertain.Additionally, the Clinton presidency will certainly be studied and evaluated in terms of its major domestic success: eliminating the federal deficit and overseeing the strongest economy in recent memory. Although there has been some partisan debate about the extent to which the 1990's boom can be attributed to Clinton, the mainstream interpretation now tends to give great credit to Clinton and his economic team, especially Robert Rubin of the National Economic Council and later the secretary of the Treasury, for uncommon fiscal discipline in 1993. These efforts fueled a period of confidence in the financial markets. What is unclear is whether this great economic success will weigh very heavily in the judgment of future historians, who tend to evaluate Presidents more on enduring programs than on the quality of their budgets; a new national health care system would have been just such a program. Clinton's failure to win that battle may thus loom larger in the judgment of history than the economic successes that benefited Americans of his era. This may be especially true in Clinton's case, since his successor as President, George W. Bush, took steps which reversed the nation's fiscal position, from one of exceptional surpluses to one of exceptional deficits. In terms of foreign policy, the Clinton record is also mixed. One of Clinton's core missions as President, he often said, was to prepare Americans for a world in which global economic forces failed to respect national boundaries. Perhaps his greatest accomplishments, then, came in the area of economic globalization-—establishing several new regimes of free trade, with NAFTA and GATT. Moreover, he and the Rubin Treasury Department, with the important assistance of Treasury Deputy Secretary Lawrence Summers, headed off a number of economic catastrophes in the developing world. But the complexities of the currency problems in Mexico and East Asia may deprive the administration of some of the credit it rightly deserves for resolving these problems. Not many Americans understood, or understand, exactly what was at stake in these arcane currency interventions. Those who watched carefully, however, often claim that the exercise of creative, unilateral executive power in the Mexican peso crisis, when the congressional leadership refused to provide legislative support, was one of Bill Clinton's brightest moments.The President's success in the Balkans will undoubtedly resonate well historically, as the administration helped end a conflict that threatened both the security of Europe and the viability of transatlantic cooperative arrangements. But the failure to act in Rwanda, in particular, seems likely to loom large in future historical evaluations. Clinton's overall management of the immediate post-Cold War environment will certainly endure great scrutiny.Finally, it is probably the case that few Clinton historical retrospectives will get very far before noting that this was only the second American President to suffer the disgrace of impeachment. It is evident from the presidency of his successor that any harm Clinton did to the institution of the presidency was, all things considered, rather meager, as the younger Bush has amassed an extraordinary degree of power in that office. But the damage done to Clinton's place in history is far more pronounced and probably permanent. Future historians will likely evaluate not just what Clinton did, but also what he did not accomplish, because he was tied-up in a second-term struggle for political survival. It is this consideration of "what might have been" that may be Clinton's greatest obstacle to gaining historical stature.

It is difficult to make good judgements about Bill Clinton's permanent historical legacy, but one area of his presidency that researchers are now starting to concentrate on is his influence on the 2000 presidential election.

Vice President Al Gore, Clinton's potential successor, lost the 2000 presidential vote to George W. Bush.

The 2000 presidential election was one of the most bitterly contested in American history, and it was only settled when the Supreme Court chose to halt vote counting in Florida, thereby proclaiming George W. Bush the winner.

As a result, the significance of the President Bill Clinton impact the 2000 presidential election are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on President Bill, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1078885

#SPJ2

Answer:

Technology made WWI different from previous conflicts in that "The destructive technology meant more casualties of war." Technology applied to the fabriu¿cation of weapons to be used in World War 1, produce lethal weaponry that killed millions of people and produce destruction never before seen in other wars.

Explanation:

Answer:

1 Thanks in part to man's technological gains from the industrial revolution, weapons are now being produced that make an offensive war absolute

2 Weapons are now being produced to counter Trench Warfare. The idea is to keep a strong defensive while creating weapons to at least try an offensive.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

the Answer

Explanation:

A. providing guides and limits to the government’s power.

Answer:

I would say the economy became more industrial and less agricultural based for the first one.

For the second one the cash crop was cotton

Explanation:

If u search cash crop south it will come up with cotton, tobacco, rice and indigo. I would say that cotton was their main thing though.

And for the second one I was stuck between the economy became more industrial and less agricultural based, and the economy remained mostly industrial based. I went with the first one cause it seems like America was making more money from manufacturing.  

Answer:

Yes, if the average citizens come together to change something like a law.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

hope it helps

Answer:

The mongols led by Genghis Khan were very destructive in many aspects but I will name a few. First of all the mongols traveled and destroyed whole villages and territories. Secondly they were absolutely ruthless to the inhabitants and therefore murdered and terrorized them all.

Explanation: