The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Newspapers frequently ran articles about anarchists and the threats posed by "radicals" in 1919 and 1920. The newspapers were interested in running these kinds of stories because these are sensationalists newspapers that love to create more drama and fear with their stories. The more drama the more people wanted to buy the newspaper to read the news. That has been one of the unofficial precepts of "Yellow Journalism," or sensationalistic news: caught people´s attention through drama.
How might this have influenced the Palmer Raids?
Heavily. That kind of news coverage generated fear in American citizens who were scared about the presence of anarchists and communists in the United States.
The main effect of the Palmer Raids was that they brought about the end of the red scare by clearing several supposed radicals. US President Woodrow Wilson ordered Attorney General Michael Palmer to execute the Palmer Raids to imprison anarchists and communists.
Why do you think the founders of the United States borrowed ideas from the Roman Republic?
Answer:
The founders of the US most likely took ideas from the Romans because their system allowed for the citizens to have a voice in who ran their empire. Considering that the US just broke away from Great Britain when starting a new country, they wanted to ensure that their citizens had a voice. When the Americans were colonists, they had little/no influence on government policies and laws.
The Romans established a republic for very similar reasons, as they had a tyrannical king who they overthrew. With a new start, the Romans created a government where people got to elect political officials, there were term limits for the two consuls, and the Senate (comprising of 300 people) had the chance to make laws. The United States probably saw this as a highly effective system in which multiple voices could be heard, so they based our foundation on the ones created by the Romans.
Answer:
The founders of the US most likely took ideas from the Romans because their system allowed for the citizens to have a voice in who ran their empire. The United States probably saw this as a highly effective system in which multiple voices could be heard, so they based our foundation on the ones created by the Romans.
(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ pls help meeeeeeeeeee if right i will give brainiest i promise ♥
Answer:
your answer is B
Explanation:
Aristotle
The public speaker Demosthenes said that the Macedonian king Phillip II was considered a threat to Greek freedom.
Discuss how society is formed
Answer:
A society is formed by group of people living together without violence,misunderstandying
Which note-taking tool will help Deidre quickly find the names, dates, and places later when it is time to review?
Answer:
a highlighter
Explanation:
got it right on edg
Answer:
a highlighter
Explanation:
Why was it difficult for poor people to be Athenian citizens?
Answer:
Practices of the Poor in the PolisGreek society's view of the poor was often critical and excluded them: the poor were considered to have low morality and the degradation of insecurity and impiety. They looted altars and stole offerings made to the gods, lied and would do anything to get enough to survive.What newly independent country bordered on the United States in the 1800s?
Mexico
Canada
British Honduras
Cuba
Answer:
Mexico
Explanation:
Mexico
Did other countries in Europe support the French Revolution?Why or why not?
what makes Russia have an authoritarian government?
The authoritarian tendencies in contemporary Russian society are a
regrettable reality. The assertion that an authoritarian government only can
lead the country out of the current crisis has become a general fashion
nowadays.
This notion is widely spread among the ruling elite, zealously searching
an autocratic leader. Altogether, the inclination to the authoritarianism is more
and more actively being revealed by diverse social groups. They, having
recently rejected the authoritarian values, much evidently show the readiness
for the ideological legitimization of authoritarianism.
This circumstance makes actual the thorough study of the
phenomenon, its peculiarities, prospects and dangers in today’s Russian
context.
In the paper presented, a few most important tendencies linked with the
authoritarian views dissemination are examined and the threats are shown that
jeopardize weak, not well-established Russian democratic institutions and
procedures.
The following conclusions might be drawn out of the research paper.
The threat of authoritarianism is high in Russia. The strengthening of
authoritarian tendencies in the country has given rise not by historically
preconditioned reasons, but by today’s current situation, i.e., the deep
economic, social, political and ideological crisis.
Though, there are some actual factors able to counteract the
consolidation of the authoritarian orders. The real perspective of the
systematic crisis further aggravation does not allow to exclude any variants of
development.
Nevertheless, the present onslaught of authoritarianism seems not to be
the result of a certain fateful predetermination.
Russia stands in need of strong democracy capable of resisting
authoritarianism, taking the country out of crisis and safeguarding it’s
citizens’ security and prosperity.
The possibilities for this type of democracy exist. The question is how
they will be used by society.
When a country must
some of its land to another country, it is generally not a quiet surrender
Answer:
Are you asking a true or false question or are you just saying stuff
Explanation:
Answer:
what type of question is this one
Explanation:
How did Thomas Hobbes compare to other philosophers of his time?
Answer:
Thye had similar views and all were vouching for the same things
Explanation:
mark brainiest plzz
To Hobbes, the government can do anything it wants. The people give up their rights to an absolute ruler. The major difference, then, is that Locke envisions a very limited government while Hobbes believes in the need for an absolute monarchy.
