How go i get the probability

The 90% confidence interval for the sample is (35.384, 36.616).

We may use the following expression to determine the 90% confidence interval for a sample of 64 participants with a mean of 36 and a standard deviation of 3.

⇄

where: X = sample mean

Z[tex]\alpha[/tex]/2 = critical value for a 90%  level from the ordinary normal distribution, which is roughly 1.645

σ = population standard deviation

n = sample size

Inputting the values provided yields:

CI = 36 ± 1.645 * (3 / √64)

When we condense the equation between the brackets, we obtain:

CI = 36 ± 1.645 * (3 / 8)

Further simplification results in:

CI = 36 ± 0.616

Consequently, the sample's 90% confidence interval is as follows:

(36 - 0.616, 36 + 0.616) = (35.384, 36.616)

Learn more about deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29088233?

#SPJ1

Our calculated t-value (-2.54) is beyond this critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners.

To test if there is a significant difference between the mean number of miles run each week by group runners and individual runners who are training for marathons, we can use a two-sample t-test.

Let's assume that the population standard deviation for the individual runners is also 4.2 miles per week.

We can set up the hypotheses as follows:

Null hypothesis: The mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners is the same.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners is different.

Mathematically, we can write:

H0: μ1 = μ2

Ha: μ1 ≠ μ2

where μ1 is the population mean for group runners and μ2 is the population mean for individual runners.

We are given the sample mean for the group runners, which is 49.0 miles per week. We do not know the sample mean for the individual runners. Let's assume that we collect a random sample of 32 individual runners and find that their sample mean is 52.0 miles per week.

We can calculate the test statistic as follows:

t = (X1 - X2) / sqrt((s1^2/n1) + (s2^2/n2))

where X1 and X2 are the sample means for group runners and individual runners, s1 and s2 are the population standard deviations for group runners and individual runners, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes for group runners and individual runners.

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (49.0 - 52.0) / sqrt((4.2^2/32) + (4.2^2/32))

t = -3.0 / 1.182

t = -2.54

Using a t-distribution table with 62 degrees of freedom (32 + 32 - 2), we can find that the critical value for a two-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05 is approximately ±2.0. Since our calculated t-value (-2.54) is beyond this critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners.

To learn more about null hypothesis visit: https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The measurement which is closest to the number of miles between these two cities is 113 miles.

Given the distance between two cities is 180 kilometers.

If there are approximately 8 kilometers in 5 miles, we can use this conversion factor to convert 180 kilometers to miles, then one kilometer is approximately equal to 5/8 miles (0.625 miles).

To find the number of miles between the two cities, we can convert 180 kilometers to miles by multiplying by the conversion factor:

180 kilometers × (5/8 miles per kilometer) ≈ 112.5 miles = approximately 113 miles

Therefore, the closest measurement to the number of miles between these two cities is approximately 113 miles.

Know more about miles here:

https://brainly.com/question/25631156

#SPJ11

It should be noted that with the equations 6 old printers would produce a batch of comic books in less time.

Using 2 new printers is 27 minutes faster than using 6 old printers.

6 old printers would produce 6*(1/150) = 2/75 of a batch per minute.

2 new printers would produce 2*(1/72) = 1/36 of a batch per minute.

(5/6) * t = 30

(4/2) * t' = 18

Solving for t and t', we get:

t = 36 minutes

t' = 9 minutes

Therefore, using 6 old printers would take 36 minutes to produce a batch of comic books, while using 2 new printers would take only 9 minutes. Using 2 new printers is 27 minutes faster than using 6 old printers.

Learn more about equations on

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 ∩ E2) is the probability that at least one of the two events occurs in any trial of the experiment.

The correct answer is D. P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 ∩ E2).

The probability that at least one of two events occurs can be calculated using the principle of inclusion-exclusion.

The formula for this is:

P(E1 or E2) = P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 and E2)

Where:

P(E1) is the probability of event E1 occurring.

P(E2) is the probability of event E2 occurring.

P(E1 and E2) is the probability of both events E1 and E2 occurring simultaneously.

This formula represents the probability that at least one of the two events (E1 or E2) occurs in any trial of the experiment.

It's derived using the principle of inclusion-exclusion.

P(E1) represents the probability of event E1 occurring.

P(E2) represents the probability of event E2 occurring.

P(E1 ∩ E2) represents the probability of both events E1 and E2 occurring simultaneously.

By adding the probabilities of each individual event and then subtracting the probability of their intersection, you're accounting for the possibility of double-counting the intersection when adding the probabilities of the individual events.

So, the formula accurately captures the probability of at least one of the two events occurring.

Hence, P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 ∩ E2) is the probability that at least one of the two events occurs in any trial of the experiment.

The correct answer is D. P(E1) + P(E2) - P(E1 ∩ E2).

#SPJ12

complete question:

Two events, E1 and E2, are defined for a random experiment. What is the probability that at least one of the two events occurs in any trial of the experiment?

A.

P(E1) + P(E2) − 2P(E1 ∩ E2)

B.

P(E1) + P(E2) + P(E1 ∩ E2)

C.

P(E1) − P(E2) − P(E1 ∩ E2)

D.

P(E1) + P(E2) − P(E1 ∩ E2)

The graph of constant of proportionality of y = 3.75x is attached

The constant of proportionality is a term that indicates a reciprocal relationship between two variables, in which the change of one affects the other similarly.

When x and y are directly linked in this way, the following equation can be used to calculate how they operate together:

y = kx,

where

k serves as the aforementioned constant.

In the problem k = 3.75

Lean more about constant of proportionality at

https://brainly.com/question/27598477

#SPJ1

The volume of the prism is 180 cm³.

A prism is a 3D (three-dimensional) solid which has faces that are identical at both ends. The other faces are flats. A prism is named after its base.

The volume of any prism can be calculated using the formula:

V = A[tex]_{B}[/tex] * h

where A[tex]_{B}[/tex] is area of base and h is height of prism

In this case, we have the following information about the prism:

A[tex]_{B}[/tex]  = 20 cm²

h = 9cm

V = 20 * 9

V = 180 cm³

Learn more about prism on:

https://brainly.com/question/23766958

#SPJ1

Complete Question

Check attached image

Answer:

I believe the answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

18 divided by 6 is 3, meaning y is constantly moving 3 spaces up as x moves to the right 1 on a graph.

The first fraction is closer to 1, while the second fraction is closer to 17.

Let's first determine the value of the first fraction with a denominator of 4, which rounds to 1.

Since the fraction is less than 1 and rounds to 1, its numerator must be 3. Therefore, the first fraction is:

3/4 = 0.75

Now let's consider the second fraction, which has a denominator of 6 and the same numerator as the first fraction. So its value is:

3/6 = 1/2 = 0.5

To determine which fraction is closer to 1 or 17, we need to calculate the absolute difference between the value of each fraction and 1 or 17, and then compare those differences.

For the first fraction, the absolute difference between 0.75 and 1 is:

|1 - 0.75| = 0.25

The absolute difference between 0.75 and 17 is:

|17 - 0.75| = 16.25

For the second fraction, the absolute difference between 0.5 and 1 is:

|1 - 0.5| = 0.5

The absolute difference between 0.5 and 17 is:

|17 - 0.5| = 16.5

Therefore, the first fraction is closer to 1, while the second fraction is closer to 17.

Learn more about fraction;

brainly.com/question/729654

#SPJ4

The vertex is the highest or lowest point on the parabola, the line of symmetry is a vertical line passing through the vertex and dividing the parabola into two equal halves, and the number of x-intercepts depends on the discriminant of the quadratic equation.

The vertex is a point on a parabola where the curve changes direction. It is the highest or lowest point on the curve, depending on whether it opens up or down. The vertex is represented as (h, k), where h is the x-coordinate and k is the y-coordinate.

The line of symmetry is a vertical line that divides the parabola into two equal halves. It passes through the vertex and is equidistant from the two arms of the parabola. The equation of the line of symmetry is x = h.

The number of x-intercepts is determined by the equation of the parabola. If the discriminant of the quadratic equation is positive, then the parabola intersects the x-axis at two distinct points, and there are two x-intercepts. If the discriminant is zero, then the parabola touches the x-axis at one point, and there is one x-intercept. If the discriminant is negative, then the parabola does not intersect the x-axis, and there are no x-intercepts.

To know more about parabola, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31142122#

#SPJ11

The width of the swamp is 12 feet, and the length is 50 feet.

length is 10 less than 5 times its width. We can write that as:

Equation for length:

L = 5W - 10

We also know that the perimeter of the swamp is 124 feet. The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is:

Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)

So, we have:

124 = 2(L + W)

Now, we can substitute the expression for L from the first equation into the second equation:

124 = 2((5W - 10) + W)

Now, we can solve for W:

Step 2: solving for width

124 = 2(6W - 10)

62 = 6W - 10

72 = 6W

W = 12

Now that we have the width (W = 12 feet), we can find the length by plugging the width back into the equation for L:

Step 1: solving for length

L = 5W - 10

L = 5(12) - 10

L = 60 - 10

L = 50

So, the width of the swamp is 12 feet, and the length is 50 feet.

Read more on length and width here:https://brainly.com/question/15161439

#SPJ4

The swamp has a perimeter 124 feet the length L of the swamp is 10 less than 5 times it width What are the length and the width of the swamp

Stevie will need to work at least 150 hours to make at least $1200 after accounting for the initial cost of equipment.

to find the business hours of work, Let's start by defining the variables given in the problem:

The initial cost of equipment is $175.

Stevie charges $12 per hour for cleanup.

Stevie wants to make at least $1200.

The number of hours worked is represented by h.

Now, we can set up an equation to solve for h:

Total earnings - Total cost = Desired profit

We can express the total earnings as the product of the hourly rate and the number of hours worked:

Total earnings = $12h

The total cost includes the initial cost of equipment plus any additional costs incurred during cleanup:

Total cost = $175 + additional costs

Since we don't know the value of the additional costs, we'll leave it as a variable.

Substituting these expressions into the equation, we get:

$12h - ($175 + additional costs) = $1200

Simplifying the equation, we get:

$12h - $175 - additional costs = $1200

$12h - $1375 = additional costs + $1200

$12h - $1375 = additional costs

Now we have an equation that relates the number of hours worked to the additional costs incurred during cleanup. We want to find the minimum value of h that satisfies this equation, since Stevie wants to make at least $1200.

To do this, we need to estimate the additional costs incurred during cleanup. Let's assume that Stevie spends an average of $4 per hour on additional costs (e.g., gasoline, trash bags, etc.). Then, the equation becomes:

$12h - $1375 = $4h + $175

Simplifying further, we get:

$8h = $1200

h = 150

Therefore, Stevie will need to work at least 150 hours to make at least $1200 after accounting for the initial cost of equipment and the estimated additional costs incurred during cleanup.

Learn more about Business

brainly.com/question/15826604

#SPJ11

c = number of chickens

d = number of ducks

c = 4d because there are 4 times as many chickens as ducks

c = d+72 because there are 72 more chickens

4d = d+72 after using substitution

4d-d = 72

3d = 72

d = 72/3

d = 24

c = 4d = 4*24 = 96  ...or...  c = d+72 = 24+72 = 96

a)The amount in the account after 5 years, compounded annually, will be approximately $60,625.06.

b) The amount in the account after 5 years, compounded semiannually, will be approximately $61,588.88.

The amount in the account after 5 years can be calculated using the compound interest formula. For an initial investment of $47,000 at an annual interest rate of 5%, compounded annually or semiannually, the amount in the account will be different.

(a) For compounding annually:

The compound interest formula is given by:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where:

A = the amount after time t

P = principal amount (initial investment) = $47,000

r = annual interest rate = 5% or 0.05 (as a decimal)

n = number of times interest is compounded per year = 1 (since it is compounded annually)

t = time period = 5 years

Plugging in the given values, we get:

A = 47000(1 + 0.05/1)^(1*5)

A = 47000(1.05)^5

A ≈ $60,625.06

So, the amount in the account after 5 years, compounded annually, will be approximately $60,625.06.

(b) For compounding semiannually:

The only difference from the above calculation is the value of 'n', which is the number of times interest is compounded per year. In this case, 'n' will be 2, as interest is compounded semiannually (twice a year).

Plugging in the given values, we get:

A = 47000(1 + 0.05/2)^(2*5)

A = 47000(1.025)^10

A ≈ $61,588.88

So, the amount in the account after 5 years, compounded semiannually, will be approximately $61,588.88.

For more questions like Interest click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/13324776

#SPJ11

The power rule for derivatives is  -26/5.

The derivative is a fundamental concept that measures how much a function changes as its input changes. It is a mathematical tool used to find the instantaneous rate of change of a function at a specific point. The derivative of a function f(x) at a point x=a, denoted by f'(a), is the slope of the tangent line to the graph of f(x) at the point (a, f(a)).

a. f(x) = 2x³

Using the power rule for derivatives, we have:

f'(x) = 6x²

So, f'(2) = 6(2)² = 24.

b. g(x) = 13x^(1/2)

Using the power rule for derivatives, we have:

g'(x) = (1/2) * 13x^(-1/2) = (13/2√x)

So, g'(3) = (13/2√3).

c. h(x) = hx

Using the power rule for derivatives, we have:

h'(x) = h

So, h'(4) = h.

d. j(x) = 130x^(-1)

Using the power rule for derivatives, we have:

j'(x) = -130x^(-2)

So, j'(5) = -130(5)^(-2) = -130/25 = -26/5.

To learn more about power rule visit: https://brainly.com/question/23418174

#SPJ11

Since 2 is greater than 1, it would have been faster for Daniel to swim directly to the campsite. Therefore, Daniel's sister is incorrect.

We can solve this problem using the formula for distance, rate, and time, which is:

distance = rate x time

Let's assume that Daniel swims at a rate of s feet per second and jogs at a rate of j feet per second. If he swims directly to the campsite, the distance he needs to cover is the distance d between the campsite and the boat ramp, which is 200 feet. If he swims to the boat ramp and then jogs to the campsite, he will need to cover the distance d twice, once while swimming and once while jogging. The total distance he will cover is 2d = 400 feet.

If Daniel swims directly to the campsite, the time it will take him to cover the distance is:

time1 = d/s

If he swims to the boat ramp and then jogs to the campsite, the time it will take him to cover the distance is:

time2 = d/s + d/j

To compare the two times, we can take their ratio:

time2/time1 = (d/s + d/j)/(d/s) = 1 + j/s

If this ratio is less than 1, then Daniel's sister is correct, and he would have arrived quicker by swimming to the boat ramp and then jogging. If the ratio is greater than 1, then it would have been faster for him to swim directly to the campsite.

Substituting d = 200, we get:

time2/time1 = 1 + j/s = 1 + (j/s)*(200/200) = 1 + (200j)/(ds)

Since Daniel arrives at the campsite out of breath from his swim and jog, we can assume that his rates of swimming and jogging are roughly equal. Let's assume s = j = r, where r is the common rate of swimming and jogging. Substituting this into the ratio, we get:

time2/time1 = 1 + (200r)/(dr) = 1 + 200/d

To determine if Daniel's sister is correct, we need to compare this ratio to 1. If time2/time1 is less than 1, then Daniel's sister is correct. If it is greater than 1, then it would have been faster for Daniel to swim directly to the campsite.

Substituting d = 200, we get:

time2/time1 = 1 + 200/200 = 2

Since 2 is greater than 1, it would have been faster for Daniel to swim directly to the campsite. Therefore, Daniel's sister is incorrect.

learn more about "Distance":- https://brainly.com/question/7243416

#SPJ11

Bristol is the cheapest city and Paul can drop from his plans to stay under budget.

To determine which city Paul can drop and still stay under budget, we need to find the total cost of visiting all four cities and compare it to Paul's budget of £300.

We do not have information about the cost of sightseeing in each city, so we will assume that the cost is the same for each city. In that case, the cost of visiting all four cities is:

Cost of visiting all cities = Cost of visiting one city x 4

Let's call the cost of visiting one city "x". Then:

Cost of visiting all cities = x * 4

To stay under budget, the cost of visiting all cities must be less than or equal to £300. So we can write the following inequality:

Simplifying this inequality, we get:

x ≤ £75

To learn more about the arithmetic, refer the link:

https://brainly.com/question/14124581

#SPJ4

The answer is (c) Bristol, as it has the highest cost among the remaining cities and dropping it would leave Paul with 224 pounds, which is still within his budget.

A budget is whenever one plans on how to spend an estimated income. All the income should be considered as well as all the expenses. In other words, it is an expending plan.

The total cost of visiting all cities is:

76 + 66 + 91 + 60 + 72 = 365

To stay under budget, Paul must drop at least one city. To determine the cheapest city to drop, we can calculate the cost of the trip to each city if visited individually and compare it to the remaining budget:

- Bristol: 76 pounds

 Remaining budget: 300 - 76 = 224 pounds

- Leicester: 66 pounds

 Remaining budget: 300 - 66 = 234 pounds

- Glasgow: 91 pounds

 Remaining budget: 300 - 91 = 209 pounds

- Leeds: 60 pounds

 Remaining budget: 300 - 60 = 240 pounds

- Belfast: 72 pounds

 Remaining budget: 300 - 72 = 228 pounds

The city that Paul can drop while staying under budget is the one with the lowest cost.

Therefore, the answer is (c) Bristol, as it has the highest cost among the remaining cities and dropping it would leave Paul with 224 pounds, which is still within his budget.

To learn more about the budget, refer the link:

https://brainly.com/question/8647699

#SPJ4

Answer:

y > -1

Step-by-step explanation:

The range is about the y, not the x, so we can eliminate options B & D.

We see the y touch -1 and then go up to ∞, so the answer is y > -1

1a. The period of the motion is the time it takes for the horse to complete one full cycle of motion, and it is given by:

T = 2π/ω.

See attached graph.

1b. The period of the motion is the time it takes for the carousel to complete one full cycle of motion, and it is also given by:

T = 2π/ω.

1a.
let's assume that the motion of the horse can be modeled by a simple harmonic motion. The equation for simple harmonic motion is:

y = A sin(ωt + φ)

where:

y is the displacement from the equilibrium position

A is the amplitude (maximum displacement)

ω is the angular frequency (2π times the frequency)

t is time

φ is the phase angle

Assuming that the horse's motion is in a vertical direction and that the highest point of its motion corresponds to y = 0, we can write the equation as:

y = A sin(ωt)

where A is the amplitude of the motion and ω is the angular frequency.

We can plot this function as a sine wave on a graph, where the horizontal axis represents time and the vertical axis represents displacement. The period of the motion is the time it takes for the horse to complete one full cycle of motion, and it is given by:

T = 2π/ω

To determine when Ivan will get his next opportunity to take a perfect shot, we need to know the period of the horse's motion. Without additional information, it's difficult to estimate the period accurately.


The graph of the carousel equation θ = A cos(ωt) can be labeled as follows:

1b.
The motion of the carousel can also be modeled as a simple harmonic motion, with the equation:

θ = A cos(ωt + φ)

where:

θ is the angular displacement from the equilibrium position

A is the amplitude (maximum angular displacement)

ω is the angular frequency (2π times the frequency)

t is time

φ is the phase angle


The period of the motion is the time it takes for the carousel to complete one full cycle of motion, and it is given by:

T = 2π/ω

To determine when Ivan will get his next opportunity to take a perfect shot, we need to know the period of the carousel's motion. Without additional information, it's difficult to estimate the period accurately.

Learn more about period  at:

https://brainly.com/question/16061498

#SPJ1

Answer:

5,005

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a combination problem. The formula for combination is:

nCr = n! / (r!(n-r)!)

Where n is the total number of items, and r is the number of items to be selected.

Using this formula, we can calculate the number of ways to choose 9 varieties from 15:

15C9 = 15! / (9!(15-9)!) = 5005

Therefore, there are 5,005 ways to choose 9 varieties from 15 varieties of pansies.

The absolute value of -8 1/2 is less than the absolute value of -9 1/2.

To compare the absolute values of -8 1/2 and -9 1/2, follow these steps:
1. Convert the mixed numbers to improper fractions:
-8 1/2 = -17/2
-9 1/2 = -19/2

2. Find the absolute values of both numbers:
|-17/2| = 17/2
|-19/2| = 19/2

3. Compare the absolute values and choose the correct symbol:
17/2 < 19/2
So, the statement is: The absolute value of -8 1/2 is less than the absolute value of -9 1/2.

Learn more about "absolute value": https://brainly.com/question/1301718

#SPJ11

Taking the data into consideration, we can calculate and conclude that the temperature at midnight was -4, through the use of an equation.

According to the prompt, the temperature is now -7. We also know that, since midnight, the temperature tripled and then rose 5 degrees.If we let x be the temperature at midnight, then we can set up the following equation:

3x + 5 = -7

Subtracting 5 from both sides, we get:

3x = -12

Dividing by 3, we get:

x = -4

Therefore, the temperature at midnight was -4 degrees. With that in mind, we conclude we have correctly answered this question.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Bob's minimum monthly credit card payment needs to be B) $129.00 to reach his dti goal of 36%.

Bob's total monthly debt payments are $1,947.00 ($1,250.00 mortgage + $349.00 auto loan + $348.00 credit cards). To achieve a dti ratio of 36%, his total monthly debt payments should be no more than $1,728.00 ($4,800.00 * 36%).

Therefore, he needs to reduce his monthly credit card payment by $219.00 ($1,947.00 - $1,728.00). Since his current minimum monthly credit card payment is $348.00, he needs to reduce it to d) $129.00 ($348.00 - $219.00) to reach his dti goal.

For more questions like Payment click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/15136793

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly selected house with 2 bathrooms has 3 is: 0.8.

So, the fourth option is correct.

We have given that,

The two-way table shows the number of houses on the market in the Castillos’ price range.

A 6-column table has 4 rows.

The first column has entries 1 bathroom, 2 bathrooms and 3 bathrooms, in total.

The second column is labeled 1 bedroom with entries 67, 0, 0, 67.

The third column is labeled 2 bedrooms with entries 21, 6, 18, 45.

We are only considering the houses that have 2 bathrooms.

There are a total of 30 of these houses.

Out of these 30, 24 have 3 bedrooms.  

What is the formula for probability?

The probability of an event can only be between 0 and 1 and can also be written as a percentage.

This makes the probability 24/30, which is 0.8.

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected house with 2 bathrooms has 3 is: 0.8.

So, the fourth option is correct.

To learn more about the probability visit:

brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ12

You can fill 4 five liter gas tanks from a full 20 liter gas can.

To determine how many 5-liter gas tanks can be filled from a full 20-liter gas can, you would divide the total capacity of the gas can by the capacity of the individual gas tanks.

Step 1: Identify the total capacity of the gas can (20 liters) and the capacity of each gas tank (5 liters).
Step 2: Divide the total capacity by the individual tank capacity (20 liters / 5 liters).

Your answer: You can fill 4 (20 liters / 5 liters = 4) 5-liter gas tanks from a full 20-liter gas can.

Learn  more about Unitary Method: https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ11

The sound level of the vocalizations of a blue whale is approximately 140.28 decibels.

The question asks us to find the sound level in decibels (db) of the vocalizations of a blue whale, given its sound intensity of 106.8 watts/meter2.

The formula for sound level in decibels is:

L = 10log(i/I0)

Where L is the sound level in decibels, i is the sound intensity in watts/meter2, and I0 is the smallest sound intensity that can be heard by the human ear (approximately 1x10⁻¹² watts/meter2).

Plugging in the given values, we get:

L = 10log(106.8/1x10⁻¹² )

Simplifying this expression, we get:

L = 10log(1.068x10¹⁴)

L = 10(14.028)

L = 140.28

Therefore, the sound level of the vocalizations of a blue whale is approximately 140.28 decibels.

Learn more about sound level

brainly.com/question/31042401

#SPJ11

The  function f(x)=500[tex]x^2[/tex] +10,000  can  be  used  to  model  the  food  vendor's  annual  revenue. The  food  vendor  would expect  to  bring  in  $ 60,000  in  annual  revenue by 10 years from now.

To find out when the mobile food vendor should expect to bring in $60,000 in annual revenue using the function f(x) = 500x^2 + 10,000, follow these steps:

1. Set the function equal to 60,000: 500[tex]x^2[/tex]+ 10,000 = 60,000
2. Subtract 60,000 from both sides of the equation: 500[tex]x^2[/tex]+ 10,000 - 60,000 = 0
3. Simplify the equation: 500[tex]x^2[/tex]- 50,000 = 0
4. Divide both sides by 500:[tex]x^2[/tex] - 100 = 0
5. Add 100 to both sides: [tex]x^2[/tex] = 100
6. Find the square root of both sides: x = ±10

Since it doesn't make sense to have a negative number of years, the food vendor should expect to bring in $60,000 in annual revenue 10 years from now.

To learn more about function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30721594#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1 - divide

2 - measur

3 - add

answer = 44.78

The correct options are:

Option B:  The football is thrown from 6 feet off the ground.

when t = 0

h(t) = 6 * 75 * 0 + 16 * 0

= 6 feet

Option C : - 16t² represents the effect of gravity

we have

[tex]h = ut - \frac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}gt^2=-16t^2[/tex]

F. The vertex of the graph of h gives the maximum height of the foot

Read more on  functions here: https://brainly.com/question/10439235

#SPJ1