The probability of spinning fewer than four nines is 1,626,101,367 / 1073741824, which simplifies to approximately 1.514%.
To find the probability of spinning fewer than four nines, we need to first calculate the total number of possible outcomes. The spinner can land on any of the eight sections on the board, and it is spun 10 times. So, the total number of possible outcomes is 8^10, which is 1073741824.
Next, we need to calculate the number of outcomes where fewer than four nines are spun. We can do this by finding the number of outcomes with 0, 1, 2, or 3 nines, and adding them up.
To find the number of outcomes with 0 nines, we need to find the number of ways to choose from the non-nine sections on the board. There are 5 non-nine sections, and we need to choose 10 of them. This is a combination problem, and the number of outcomes is 252.
To find the number of outcomes with 1, 2, or 3 nines, we need to use a similar approach. We can use combinations to find the number of ways to choose the nines and the non-nines, and then multiply them together. The number of outcomes with 1 nine is 9 x 5^9, with 2 nines is 9 x 9 x 5^8, and with 3 nines is 9 x 9 x 9 x 5^7.
Adding up all these outcomes, we get 252 + 9 x 5^9 + 9 x 9 x 5^8 + 9 x 9 x 9 x 5^7 = 1,626,101,367.
So, the probability of spinning fewer than four nines is 1,626,101,367 / 1073741824, which simplifies to approximately 1.514%.
To know more about probability, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780#
#SPJ11
A medical researcher is studying the effects of a drug on blood pressure. Subjects in the study have their blood pressure taken at the beginning of the study. After being on the medication for 4 weeks, their blood pressure is taken again. The change in blood pressure is recorded and used in doing the hypothesis test.
Change: Final Blood Pressure - Initial Blood Pressure
The researcher wants to know if there is evidence that the drug affects blood pressure. At the end of 4 weeks, 36 subjects in the study had an average change in blood pressure of 2. 4 with a standard deviation of 4. 5.
Find the
p
-value for the hypothesis test
The p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.04. This means that if the null hypothesis is true
To find the p-value, we need to conduct a hypothesis test.
The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication:
H0: μd = 0
The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication:
Ha: μd ≠ 0
where μd is the population mean difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication.
We are given that the sample size is n = 36, the sample mean difference is ¯d = 2.4, and the sample standard deviation is s = 4.5.
We can calculate the t-statistic as:
t = (¯d - 0) / (s / sqrt(n)) = (2.4 - 0) / (4.5 / sqrt(36)) = 2.13
Using a t-distribution table with 35 degrees of freedom (df = n - 1), we find that the two-tailed p-value for t = 2.13 is approximately 0.04.
Therefore, the p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.04. This means that if the null hypothesis is true (i.e., if there is really no difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication), there is a 4% chance of observing a sample mean difference as extreme or more extreme than 2.4. Since this p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence that the drug affects blood pressure.
To know more about p-value, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30078820#
#SPJ11
Hanson ate 68 out of g gumdrops. Write an expression that shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left
The expression g - 68 shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left after eating 68 out of g.
To find out how many gumdrops Hanson has left after eating 68 out of g, we need to subtract 68 from g. Therefore, the expression that shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left is:
g - 68
This expression represents the remaining gumdrops after Hanson has eaten 68 out of g. For example, if Hanson had 100 gumdrops before eating 68 of them, then the expression would be:
100 - 68 = 32
Therefore, Hanson would have 32 gumdrops left after eating 68 out of 100.
In summary, the expression g - 68 shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left after eating 68 out of g. The value of g represents the total number of gumdrops Hanson had before eating 68.
To know more about expression, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29696241#
#SPJ11
Find the volume of the figure.
Answer:
22(15)(12) + (1/2)(22)(10)(15) = 5,610 cm^2
PLEASE HELPPPPPPPP
PLEASE IMBEGGING
The area under the curve at the given points is 3.758 sq.units.
What is the area under the curve?The area under the curve at the given points is calculated as follows;
y = -3/x ; (-7, -2)
To find the area under the curve y = -3/x between x = -7 and x = -2, we need to integrate the function from x = -7 to x = -2.
∫[-7,-2] (-3/x) dx
= [-3 ln|x|]_(-7)^(-2)
= [-3 ln|-2| - (-3 ln|-7|)]
= [-3 ln(2) + 3 ln(7)]
= 3 ln(7/2)
= 3.758 sq.units
Learn more about area under curves here: https://brainly.com/question/20733870
#SPJ1
What adds to the number +29 and multiplys to +100?
Answer:
To find two numbers that add up to +29 and multiply to +100, you can use algebra. Let's call the two numbers "x" and "y". We know that:
x + y = 29
xy = 100
We can use the first equation to solve for one of the variables in terms of the other. For example, we can solve for "y" in terms of "x" by subtracting "x" from both sides:
y = 29 - x
Now we can substitute this expression for "y" into the second equation:
x(29 - x) = 100
Expanding the left-hand side of the equation gives:
29x - x^2 = 100
Rearranging and simplifying gives a quadratic equation:
x^2 - 29x + 100 = 0
This quadratic can be factored as:
(x - 4)(x - 25) = 0
So the two numbers that add up to +29 and multiply to +100 are +4 and +25.
Harold, Rhonda, and Brad added water to beakers in science class. The line plot shows the amount of water, in cups, that they added to each of 14 beakers.
In the given line plot, the data represents the amount of water, in cups, that Harold, Rhonda, and Brad added to each of 14 beakers in their science class.
A line plot is a way to represent data that involves marking a number line for each data point and placing an “X” above the number that represents the value of that data point.
The line plot shows that most of the beakers were filled with either 1 or 2 cups of water. Specifically, there are 5 beakers with 1 cup of water and 6 beakers with 2 cups of water. There are also 2 beakers with 3 cups of water and 1 beaker with 4 cups of water.
The line plot provides a visual representation of the data that allows the viewer to quickly understand the distribution of the data. By seeing that most of the data is clustered around 1 and 2 cups of water, one can infer that the students were likely instructed to add a specific amount of water to each beaker. However, the presence of a few outliers, such as the beaker with 4 cups of water, suggests that some of the students may have made errors in their measurements or not followed the instructions closely.
Overall, the line plot provides a quick and easy way to visualize the distribution of the data and identify any outliers or patterns in the data. It is a useful tool for representing small to medium-sized datasets and is commonly used in education, research, and data analysis.
To know more about line plot, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/23902686#
#SPJ11
Answer:
if this is study island than the answer is:
All of the beakers with more than of a cup of water added to them were filled by Harold. Harold added a total of
4
cup(s) of water to his beakers.
All of the beakers with exactly of a cup of water added to them were filled by Rhonda. Rhonda added a total of
15/8 or 1 7/8
cup(s) of water to her beakers.
Brad filled the rest of the beakers. Brad added a total of
13/8 or 1 5/8
cup(s) of water to his beakers.
Step-by-step explanation:
What are your chances of winning a raffle in which 325 tickets have been sold, if you haveone ticket?
Your chances of winning a raffle with one ticket out of 325 sold is approximately 0.31% or 1 in 325.
The probability of winning a raffle is determined by dividing the number of tickets you have by the total number of tickets sold. In this case, since there are 325 tickets sold and you have only one ticket, your chances of winning are 1 in 325, which is equivalent to a probability of approximately 0.31%.
This means that you have a very low chance of winning, but it's not impossible. However, the more tickets you have, the greater your chances of winning will be. It's important to remember that winning a raffle is a matter of luck and chance, and not a guaranteed outcome.
For more questions like Probability click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ11
Just the answer is fine:)
If C is the parabola y = x? from (1, 1) to (-1,1) then Sc(x - y)dx + (y sin y?)dy equals to: Select one: O a. 12 뮤 Ob O b. 124 7 O c. None of these O d. 5 7 O e. 2 7 Check
The correct answer is e. 2/7.
How to evaluate this line integral?To evaluate this line integral, we need to parameterize the curve given by the parabola y = x from (1, 1) to (-1, 1).
Let's let x = t and y = t, where t goes from 1 to -1. Then we can rewrite the integral as follows:
[tex]\int\ C (x - y)\dx + (y \sin y)\dy[/tex]
[tex]= \int\limits^1_{-1} {[(t - t)dt + (t sin t)}\,dt}[/tex]
[tex]= \int\limits^1_{-1} { (t \sin t)} \, dt[/tex]
We can evaluate this integral using integration by parts:
Let u = t and [tex]dv = sin t\ dt[/tex]. Then [tex]du/dt = 1[/tex] and v = -cos t.
Using the formula for integration by parts, we have:
[tex]\int\limits^1_{-1} { (t \sin t)}\, dt = -t \cos t |_{-1}^{1} + \int\limits^1_{-1} { cos t}\, dt[/tex]
= -cos(-1) + cos(1) + sin(-1) - sin(1)
= 2sin(1) - 2cos(1)
Therefore, the value of the line integral is:
[tex]S_c(x - y)dx + (y \sin y)dy = 2\sin(1) - 2\cos(1)[/tex]
Hence, the correct answer is e. 2/7.
Learn more about line integral
brainly.com/question/30763905
#SPJ11
point (4, -13) lies on the graph of the equation y = kx + 7
what is value of k?
Answer:
-5
Step-by-step explanation:
(4, -13) = (x, y)
y = kx + 7
-13 = k(4) + 7
4k = -13-7
4k = -20
k = -5
#CMIIWCalculate the interest and total value on a $6,300 deposit for 8 years at a compound interest rate of 4. 5%
The interest is $2,659.23 and the total value is $8,959.23.
What is compound interest?
The interest that is calculated using both the principal and the interest that has accrued during the previous period is called compound interest. It differs from simple interest in that the principal is not taken into account when determining the interest for the subsequent period with simple interest.
Here the given principal P = $6300
Number of years = 8
Rate of interest = 4.5% = 4.5/100 = 0.045
Now using compound interest formula then,
=> Amount = [tex]P(1+r)^{t}[/tex]
=> Amount = 6300[tex](1+0.045)^8[/tex]
=> Amount = [tex]6300(1.045)^8[/tex]
=> Amount = $8,959.23
Then Interest = Amount - Principal
=> Interest = $8,959.23 - $6300 = $2,659.23.
Hence the interest is $2,659.23 and the total value is $8,959.23.
To learn more about compound interest refer the below link
https://brainly.com/question/28020457
#SPJ4
Determine the number of bricks, rounded to the nearest whole number, needed to complete the wall
The number of bricks, rounded to the nearest whole number, needed to complete the wall is 3,456 bricks.
To determine the number of bricks needed to complete a wall, you will need to know the dimensions of the wall and the size of the bricks being used. Let's say the wall is 10 feet high and 20 feet long, and the bricks being used are standard-sized bricks measuring 2.25 inches by 3.75 inches.
First, you'll need to convert the wall's dimensions from feet to inches. The wall is 120 inches high (10 feet x 12 inches per foot) and 240 inches long (20 feet x 12 inches per foot).
Next, you'll need to determine the number of bricks needed for each row. Assuming a standard brick orientation, you'll need to divide the length of the wall (240 inches) by the length of the brick (3.75 inches). This gives you 64 bricks per row (240/3.75).
To determine the number of rows needed, divide the height of the wall (120 inches) by the height of the brick (2.25 inches). This gives you 53.3 rows. Since you can't have a fraction of a row, round up to 54 rows.
To determine the total number of bricks needed, multiply the number of bricks per row (64) by the number of rows (54). This gives you 3,456 bricks. Rounded to the nearest whole number, the wall will need approximately 3,456 bricks to complete.
To know more about number, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29759818#
#SPJ11
a Open garbage attracts rodents. Suppose that the number of mice in a neighbourhood, I weeks after a strike by garbage collectors, can be approximated by the function P(t) = 2002. 10) a. How many mice are in the neighbourhood initially? b. How long does it take for the population of mice to quadruple? c. How many mice are in the neighbourhood after 5 weeks? d. How long does it take until there are 1000 mice? e. Find P' (5) and interpret the result.
a. There are 1000 mice in the neighborhood initially.
b. The population of mice never quadruple
c. After 5 weeks there are 18 mice in the neighborhood.
d. It takes 0 weeks for there to be 1000 mice.
e. The P' (5) is -96.86, indicates that after 5 weeks, the number of mice is declining at a pace of about 96.86 mice per week.
a. The initial number of mice in the neighborhood can be found by evaluating P(0):
P(0) = 2000/(1 + 10⁰/₁₀) = 2000/(1+1) = 1000
b. To find how long it takes for the population of mice to quadruple, we need to solve the equation:
P(t) = 4P(0)
2000/(1 + 10^(t/10)) = 4*1000
1 + 10^(t/10) = 1/4
10^(t/10) = -3/4
This equation has no real solutions, so the population of mice never quadruples.
c. To find how many mice are in the neighborhood after 5 weeks, we simply evaluate P(5):
P(5) = 2000/(1 + 10^(5/10)) = 2000/(1+100) = 18.18 (rounded to two decimal places)
Therefore, there are approximately 18 mice in the neighborhood after 5 weeks.
d. To find how long it takes until there are 1000 mice, we need to solve the equation:
P(t) = 1000
2000/(1 + 10^(t/10)) = 1000
1 + 10^(t/10) = 2
10^(t/10) = 1
t = 0
Therefore, there are 1000 mice in the neighborhood initially, so it takes 0 weeks for there to be 1000 mice.
e. To find P'(5), we first find the derivative of P(t):
P'(t) = -2000ln(10)/10 * 10^(t/10) / (1 + 10^(t/10))^2
Then we evaluate P'(5):
P'(5) = -2000ln(10)/10 * 10^(1/2) / (1 + 10^(1/2))^2 ≈ -96.86
This means that the population of mice is decreasing at a rate of approximately 96.86 mice per week after 5 weeks.
Learn more about population at https://brainly.com/question/30935473
#SPJ11
Qn in attachment. ..
Answer:
option c
Step-by-step explanation:
n²-1/2
pls mrk me brainliest (≧(ｴ)≦ )
14. If AB represents 50%, what is the length of a
line segment that is 100%?
Answer:
2*Ab Or AC
Step-by-step explanation:
No detail in question
If the sides of a rectangle are in the ratio 3:4 and the length of the diagonal is 10 cm, find the length of the sides
Answer: Let's use the Pythagorean theorem to solve this problem.
Let x be the common factor of the ratio 3:4, so the sides of the rectangle are 3x and 4x.
The Pythagorean theorem states that for any right triangle, the sum of the squares of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the longest side).
So, for the rectangle with sides 3x and 4x, we have:
(3x)^2 + (4x)^2 = (diagonal)^2
9x^2 + 16x^2 = 100
25x^2 = 100
x^2 = 4
Taking the square root of both sides, we get:
x = 2
Therefore, the sides of the rectangle are:
3x = 3(2) = 6 cm
4x = 4(2) = 8 cm
So, the length and width of the rectangle are 6 cm and 8 cm, respectively.
(−2x−1)(−3x 2 +6x+8)
To find the standard deviation of the liquid measure of oil in barrels, the oil company measures 25 randomly selected barrels and find the standard deviation of the samples to be s=. 34. Find the 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation
The 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation is (0.199, 0.509).
To find the 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation, we will use the chi-square distribution. We know that for a sample size of n=25, the degrees of freedom for the chi-square distribution is (n-1) = 24.
The chi-square distribution is a right-tailed distribution, so we need to find the chi-square values that will leave 4% in the right tail (for a total of 92% confidence interval).
From a chi-square distribution table, the chi-square value with 24 degrees of freedom that leaves 4% in the right tail is 41.337. The chi-square value that leaves 96% in the left tail is 13.119.
Using the formula for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation:
lower bound = [tex]sqrt((n-1)*s^2 / chi-square upper)[/tex]
upper bound = [tex]sqrt((n-1)*s^2 / chi-square lower)[/tex]
We can substitute the values we have:
lower bound = [tex]sqrt((25-1)*0.34^2 / 41.337) = 0.199[/tex]
upper bound = [tex]sqrt((25-1)*0.34^2 / 13.119) = 0.509[/tex]
Therefore, the 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation is (0.199, 0.509).
Learn more about confidence interval,
https://brainly.com/question/17097944
#SPJ11
Express the expression as a single logarithm and simplify. if necessary, round your answer to the nearest thousandth. log2 51.2 − log2 1.6
Using the quotient rule of logarithms, we have:
=log2 51.2 − log2 1.6
= [tex]log2 (51.2/1.6)[/tex]
Simplifying the numerator, we have:
[tex]log2(51.2/1.6) = log2(32)[/tex]
Using the fact that 32 = 2^5, we have:
log2 32 = log2 2^5 = 5
log2 51.2 − log2 1.6 = log2 (51.2/1.6) = log2 32 = 5
To know more about logarithm refer here
https://brainly.com/question/47152560#
#SPJ11
Write a derivative formula for the function.
f(x) = (4 ln(x))ex
The derivative formula for the function is f'(x) = 4ex(1/x + ln(x)).
How to determined the function by differentiation?To find the derivative of the function f(x) = (4 ln(x))ex, we can use the product rule and the chain rule of differentiation.
Let g(x) = 4 ln(x) and h(x) = ex. Then, we have:
f(x) = g(x)h(x)
Using the product rule, we get:
f'(x) = g'(x)h(x) + g(x)h'(x)
Now, we need to find g'(x) and h'(x):
g'(x) = 4/x (since the derivative of ln(x) with respect to x is 1/x)
h'(x) = ex
Substituting these back into the formula for f'(x), we get:
f'(x) = (4/x)ex + 4 ln(x)ex
Simplifying this expression, we get:
f'(x) = 4ex(1/x + ln(x))
Therefore, the derivative formula for the function f(x) = (4 ln(x))ex is:
f'(x) = 4ex(1/x + ln(x)).
Learn more about chain rule
brainly.com/question/30764359
#SPJ11
Assume that a simple random sample has been selected from a normally distributed population and test the given claim. identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, p-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.
a simple random sample of 25 filtered 100 mm cigarettes is obtained, and the tar content of each cigarette is measured. the sample has a mean of 19.8 mg and a standard deviation of 3.21 mg. use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is less than 21.1 mg, which is the mean for unfiltered king size cigarettes.
required:
what do the results suggest, if anything, about the effectiveness of the filters?
The results suggest that the mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is significantly lower than 21.1 mg, which is the mean for unfiltered king size cigarettes. This indicates that the filters are effective in reducing the tar content of cigarettes.
Null hypothesis: The mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is greater than or equal to 21.1 mg.
Alternative hypothesis: The mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is less than 21.1 mg.
The test statistic to use is the t-statistic, since the population standard deviation is not known.
t = (19.8 - 21.1) / (3.21 / sqrt(25)) = -2.03
Using a t-table with degrees of freedom of 24 and a significance level of 0.05, the critical t-value is -1.711. Since our test statistic is less than the critical t-value, we reject the null hypothesis.
The p-value can also be calculated using the t-distribution with degrees of freedom of 24 and the t-statistic of -2.03. The p-value is 0.029, which is less than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.
To know more about degrees of freedom refer to
https://brainly.com/question/28527491
#SPJ11
What is the tangent plane to z = ln(x−y) at point (3, 2, 0)?
The equation of the tangent plane to the surface z = ln(x - y) at the point (3, 2, 0) is x - y - z + 1 = 0.
To find the tangent plane to the surface z = ln(x - y) at the point (3, 2, 0), we can use the following steps
Find the partial derivatives of the surface with respect to x and y:
∂z/∂x = 1/(x - y)
∂z/∂y = -1/(x - y)
Evaluate these partial derivatives at the point (3, 2):
∂z/∂x (3, 2) = 1/(3 - 2) = 1
∂z/∂y (3, 2) = -1/(3 - 2) = -1
Use these values to find the equation of the tangent plane at the point (3, 2, 0):
z - f(3,2) = ∂z/∂x (3,2) (x - 3) + ∂z/∂y (3,2) (y - 2)
where f(x,y) = ln(x - y)
Plugging in the values we get:
z - 0 = 1(x - 3) - 1(y - 2)
Simplifying the equation, we get:
x - y - z + 1 = 0
For similar question on tangent plane:
https://brainly.com/question/30260323
#SPJ11
From the theory of SVD’s we know G can be decomposed as a sum of rank-many rankone matrices. Suppose that G is approximated by a rank-one matrix sqT with s ∈ Rn and q ∈ Rm with non-negative components. Can you use this fact to give a difficulty score or rating? What is the possible meaning of the vector s? Note one can use the top singular value decomposition to get this score vector!
The vector s obtained from the top SVD represents the difficulty scores for each item in the dataset, which can be used to rate or rank them accordingly.
Based on the theory of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), we can decompose matrix G into a sum of rank-many rank-one matrices. If G is approximated by a rank-one matrix sq^T, where s ∈ R^n and q ∈ R^m have non-negative components, we can use this fact to compute a difficulty score or rating.
The vector s can be interpreted as the difficulty score vector for each item, where its components represent the difficulty levels of individual items in the dataset. By using the top singular value decomposition, we can extract the most significant singular values and corresponding singular vectors to approximate G. The higher the value in the s vector, the higher the difficulty level of the corresponding item.
More on SVD: https://brainly.com/question/13144048
#SPJ11
16 Mr. Ramos's monthly mileage allowance
for a company car is 750 miles. He drove
8 miles per day for 10 days, then went on
a 3-day trip. The table shows the distance
he drove on each day of the trip.
1
t
Trip Mileage
Day Miles Driven
Tuesday
156. 1
Wednesday
240. 8
Thursday
82. 0
After the trip, how many miles remain in
Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance?
The number of miles remaining in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance is 191.1 miles.
To find out how many miles remain in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance after the trip, let's first calculate the total miles he drove:
1. For the 10 days at 8 miles per day: 10 days * 8 miles/day = 80 miles
2. For the 3-day trip, sum up the miles driven each day: 156.1 + 240.8 + 82.0 = 478.9 miles
Now, add the miles from both parts: 80 miles + 478.9 miles = 558.9 miles
Finally, subtract this total from Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance of 750 miles:
750 miles - 558.9 miles = 191.1 miles
After the trip, 191.1 miles remain in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance.
More on allowance: https://brainly.com/question/29496871
#SPJ11
If AM=25CM, MC=20CM, MN=30CM, NC=35CM. What is the scale factor
The scale factor is 7/5 or 1.4.
f AM=25CM, MC=20CM, MN=30CM, NC=35CM.find scale factor
In order to determine the scale factor, we need to compare the corresponding sides of two similar figures. Let's begin by drawing a diagram to represent the given information:
M ------- N
/ \
/ \
A ---------------- C
<-----25cm----->
<-----20cm-----> <-----35cm----->
From the diagram, we see that triangle AMC is similar to triangle CNC, since they share angle C and have proportional sides:
Scale factor = corresponding side length in triangle CNC / corresponding side length in triangle AMC
We can calculate the scale factor by comparing the lengths of the corresponding sides:
Scale factor = NC / AM
Scale factor = 35 cm / 25 cm
Scale factor = 7 / 5
Learn more about scale factor
brainly.com/question/30215044
#SPJ11
HELP PLEASE 45pts (WILL GIVE BRANLIEST!!!!)
How do you determine the scale factor of a dilation? Explain in general and with at least one example.
How do you determine if polygons are similar? Explain in general and give at least one example
If AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF, then triangle ABC is similar to triangle DEF.
To determine the scale factor of a dilation, you need to compare the corresponding lengths of the pre-image and image of a figure. The scale factor is the ratio of the lengths of any two corresponding sides.
For example, suppose you have a triangle ABC with sides AB = 3 cm, BC = 4 cm, and AC = 5 cm. If you dilate the triangle by a scale factor of 2, you get a new triangle A'B'C'.
To find the length of A'B', you multiply the length of AB by the scale factor: A'B' = 2 * AB = 2 * 3 = 6 cm. Similarly, B'C' = 2 * BC = 2 * 4 = 8 cm and A'C' = 2 * AC = 2 * 5 = 10 cm. Therefore, the scale factor of the dilation is 2.
To determine if polygons are similar, you need to check if their corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportional.
In other words, if you can transform one polygon into another by a combination of translations, rotations, reflections, and dilations, then they are similar.
For example, suppose you have two triangles ABC and DEF.
If angle A is congruent to angle D, angle B is congruent to angle E, and angle C is congruent to angle F, and the ratios of the lengths of the corresponding sides are equal, then the triangles are similar. That is, if AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF, then triangle ABC is similar to triangle DEF.
To know more about triangles refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2773823
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE I REALLY NEED HELP IM LOST
question 8.
It is expected to see precipitation on approximately 1.15 days in any given week in Raleigh, NC based on the data from January 1, 2022, to March 26, 2022.
question 9.
The probability that exactly 90 of the plants will successfully grow is approximately 0.0860.
Option A is correct.
How do we calculate?0(6/13) + 1(4/13) + 2(0) + 3(2/13) + 4(0) + 5(1/13) + 6(0) + 7(0) = 1.1538
binomial distribution with n = 100 (the number of trials) and
p = 0.87 (the probability of success on each trial).
we use the binomial probability formula to find the probability that exactly 90 plants will grow,
P(X = 90) = (100 choose 90) * (0.87)^90 * (0.13)^10
P(X = 90) = 0.0860.
learn more about binomial distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/29163389
#SPJ1
Please help factor this expression completely, then place the factors in the proper location on the grid.
1/8 x^3-1/27 y^3
will mark brainly
Using cubes formula the factored expression is given as:
1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)
To factor the expression [tex]1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3[/tex], we can utilize the difference of cubes formula, which states that the difference of two cubes can be factored as the product of their binomial factors.
In our given expression, we have[tex](1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3).[/tex] We can identify[tex]a^3 as (1/2x)^3 and b^3 as (1/3y)^3.[/tex]
Applying the difference of cubes formula, we get:
[tex](1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3) = (1/2x - 1/3y)((1/2x)^2 + (1/2x)(1/3y) + (1/3y)^2)[/tex]
Simplifying the expression within the second set of parentheses, we have:
[tex](1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3) = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)[/tex]
Therefore, the factored form of the expression 1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 is given by (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2). This represents the product of the binomial factors resulting from the application of the difference of cubes formula.
To factor the expression 1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3, we can use the difference of cubes formula, which states that:
[tex]a^3 - b^3 = (a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2)[/tex]
Applying this formula, we get:
1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)
Therefore, the expression is completely factored as:
[tex]1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)[/tex]
To know more about cubes formula refer to
https://brainly.in/question/1853390
#SPJ11
Determine the vector equation of each of the following planes.
b) the plane containing the two intersecting lines r= (4,7,3) + t(2,4,3) and r= (-1,-4,6) + s(-1,-1,3)
To find the vector equation of the plane containing the two intersecting lines, we can first find the normal vector of the plane by taking the cross product of the direction vectors of the two lines. The normal vector will be orthogonal to both direction vectors and thus will be parallel to the plane.
Direction vector of the first line: (2, 4, 3)
Direction vector of the second line: (-1, -1, 3)
Taking the cross product of these two vectors, we get:
(2, 4, 3) x (-1, -1, 3) = (9, -3, -6)
This vector is orthogonal to both direction vectors and thus is parallel to the plane. To find the vector equation of the plane, we can use the point-normal form of the equation, which is:
N · (r - P) = 0
where N is the normal vector, r is a point on the plane, and P is a known point on the plane. We can choose either of the two given points on the intersecting lines as the point P.
Let's use the point (4, 7, 3) on the first line as the point P. Then the vector equation of the plane is:
(9, -3, -6) · (r - (4, 7, 3)) = 0
Expanding and simplifying, we get:
9(x - 4) - 3(y - 7) - 6(z - 3) = 0
Simplifying further, we get:
9x - 3y - 6z = 0
Dividing by 3, we get:
3x - y - 2z = 0
Therefore, the vector equation of the plane containing the two intersecting lines is:
(3, -1, -2) · (r - (4, 7, 3)) = 0
or equivalently,
3x - y - 2z = 0.
help pls!
Use unit multipliers to convert 123 pounds per mile to ounces per centimeter.
There are 5,280 feet in 1 mile. There are 16 ounces in 1 pound. There are approximately 2.54 cm in 1 inch.
Enter your answer as a decimal rounded to the nearest hundredth. Just enter the number.
The conversion is given as follows:
123 pounds per mile = 0.01 ounces per cm.
How to obtain the conversion?The conversion is obtained applying the proportions in the context of the problem.
There are 16 ounces in 1 pound, hence the number of ounces in 123 pounds is given as follows:
123 x 16 = 1968 ounces.
There are 5,280 feet in 1 mile, 12 inches in one feet and 2.54 cm in one inch, hence the number of cm is given as follows:
5280 x 12 x 2.54 = 160934.4 cm.
Hence the rate is given as follows:
1968/160934.4 = 0.01 ounces per cm.
More can be learned about proportions at https://brainly.com/question/24372153
#SPJ1
What is next in the sequence?
1,56, T, 642, , RR , ____ , ____, _____.
The next of the sequence 1, 2, 6, 22 is equal to 86.
First term of the sequence is equal to 1
Second term of the sequence is 2
Which can be written as
1 + 2⁰ = 2
Third term is 6
which can be written as
2 + 2² = 2 + 4
= 6
Fourth term is 22
which can be written as
6 + 2⁴ = 6 + 16
= 22
Next term using the above pattern is equal to
Pattern is add the previous term with increment of the even square of 2.
22 + 2⁶ = 22 + 64
= 86
Therefore, the next term of the given sequence is equal to 86.
learn more about sequence here
brainly.com/question/30837338
#SPJ4
The given question is incomplete, I answer the question in general according to my knowledge:
What comes next in the sequence: 1, 2, 6, 22, ____ ?
